• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychosocial Safety
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety
      • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
      • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
      • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
      • What is Psychosocial Safety
      • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
      • What is Psychological Safety?
      • Understanding Psychological Terminology
      • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
      • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
      • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / Risk Homeostasis / Study Reveals an Unexpected Side Effect of Traffic Safety Messages

Study Reveals an Unexpected Side Effect of Traffic Safety Messages

May 5, 2022 by Admin 1 Comment

Interesting share from Brent Charlton. First Published Here: Science Alert

Study Reveals an Unexpected Side Effect of Traffic Safety Messages

CARLY CASSELLA – 24 APRIL 2022

Attention-grabbing signs that remind drivers of highway mortality can backfire in unexpected ways, according to a new study.

When cars in Texas zoom past crash statistics – like ‘1669 deaths this year on Texas roads’ – researchers found drivers are 4.5 percent more likely to get in a crash in the next 10 kilometres (6.21 miles).

In Texas alone, that accident rate could account for 2,600 crashes a year and an additional 16 fatalities. If the same rate exists nationwide, it’s possible road fatality reminders could be causing 17,000 car crashes in the US every year.

“Our study shows that salient, generic, in-your-face safety messages delivered to drivers crowd out more pressing safety concerns,” the authors conclude.

While traffic signs about road safety might seem helpful or innocuous, there’s a chance they are distracting drivers in a way that is more of a disaster than a deterrent.

That’s a serious issue, given that 28 states have adopted similar interventions.

Texas makes for a good case study because the state flashes fatality messages on the highway once a week each month. This allowed researchers to measure the impact of these messages on an hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly basis.

image

(Jonathan Hall)

Comparing car crashes from before the state’s safety campaign started and after, researchers were surprised to find an immediate negative impact. It seemed the campaign was doing the exact opposite of what it was intended to do.

When fatality signs went up in campaign weeks, car crashes also went up. The result is comparable to raising the speed limit by 3 to 5 miles per hour (4.8 to 8 km/h) or reducing highway troopers by up to 14 percent.

Although initially surprised, the authors of the study have found a way to explain the results.

They propose that “sobering” messages like road fatalities are too “in-your-face”. Instead of making a driver more alert, they simply make them more distracted.

By stealing some of a driver’s limited attention and turning it into anxiety about death, road signs can cause drivers to overlook other essential considerations, like knowing where other cars are around them.

The ‘distraction’ hypothesis is also supported by the fact that an increase in car crashes from fatality signs was larger on Texas roads that were more complex, such as those with more traffic or more lanes and turn-offs.

Anxiety is also another key explanation. In the Texas study, as the actual number of car crash deaths flashed on a road increased, so, too, did the chances of a car crash happening in the following 10 kilometres.

This suggests that the more shocking the sign, the more likely someone will pay more attention to the risk than the road. When the annual fatality numbers restart in February, for instance, the rate of car crashes after the sign can drop by up to 11 percent from the previous month, effectively reducing crashes by a few percent.

Past psychological research has also shown that high anxiety levels can impact our performance on a task, driving us to overthink, which can override our reflexes. Yet, for some reason, that downside was a forgotten consideration when first adopting road safety campaigns.

While previous studies in the lab have shown that fatality messages can mess with a driver’s cognitive load, research in the real world is limited. That said, vehicle simulators do indicate billboards, in general, are distracting to drivers.

“[I]t is important to measure an intervention’s effect, even for simple interventions, because good intentions do not necessarily imply good outcomes,” the authors of the Texas study warn.

Responding to the new findings in a related perspective, traffic control expert Gerald Ullman and psychologist Susan Chrysler note that the US Federal Highway Administration began discouraging the use of fatality numbers on the road in 2021.

The findings found in Texas support that decision.

“The crash data presented… clearly demonstrate a safety effect of showing fatality numbers on [dynamic message signs],” Ullman and Chrysler write.

“However, the mechanism for this safety effect is not clearly elucidated by the data presented in the paper. Additional analyses regarding crash types and documented causal factors in the crash reports might yield more insights.”

The research is a good reminder that just because a public health policy seems helpful, it still needs to be taken for a test run.

The study was published in Science.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Risk Homeostasis, Road Safety Tagged With: safety messages, traffic safety

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Rob Long says

    May 6, 2022 at 8:31 AM

    None of these results should be surprising to anyone studied in Social Psychology. It is naive in the extreme to think that any strategy is neutral, objective and doesn’t have by-products and trade-offs. Most often naive strategies get the opposite of what they desire. This is so common in behaviourist had in the sand safety that thinks of binary inputs and outputs. The rebrands behaviourism as something else and bamboozles people with fads, gimmicks and slogans. When you language is zero and your definition of safety is injuries, you clearly have no idea of what to do.
    The stuff reported above is 101 in Social Psychology, perhaps start here:
    https://personal.us.es/einfante/uploads/DOCENCIA/PSYCH301-1.1.1-Social-psychology-reading.pdf
    https://2012books.lardbucket.org/pdfs/social-psychology-principles.pdf
    https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-assets/90582_book_item_90582.pdf
    https://diasmumpuni.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/david_g-_myers_social_psychology_10th_editionbookfi.pdf

    Social Psychology is not some add on to safety, it should be th foundation of safety. There is nothing more foundational than the fact that we are social beings and that everything in our social life and relationships affects us, mostly unconsciously. There you go, but none of this even makes any conversation in traditional safety or so called ‘safety differently’.
    It is so clear. Social arrangements can make you angry, afraid, fearful, silent, confused and do so collectively. In-groupness and out-groupness is so easy to create if you know you are doing. Then again, one would need to take seriously the idea of a Collective Unconscious, certainly propagandists do and marketting does, just not safety.
    Then we see all these naive rituals created by safety that don’t work that create pessimism, cynicism and scepticism in organisations and groups then wonder why a behaviourist strategy makes culture change worse. Great for making money, offering naive promises and charging a fortune to tell stories and market guilt as a strategy to tackle a wicked problem.
    I find it so amusing that when Safety has a spike in injuries and fatality it goes to more of the same, call in th engineers and the marketers selling more goop to people who want to believe it. Thn wonder why the only thing that changes is their bank balance.
    The only thing that Safety knows for sure is that SPoR offers nothing to help. Except all those organisations who practice and use SPoR tools, know it works. Such is the fear of an industry that brags about being professional and makes miseducation compulsory. I know lets have some reform in safety and call in an engineer.

    Reply

Do you have any thoughts? Please share them below Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,500 other subscribers

RECOMMENDED READING

viral post – iso 45003 and what it cannot do

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

Psychosocial Safety and Mental Health Series

Not Just Another ‘Hazard’

Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?

How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety

ISO 45003 and What it Cannot Do

The KISS of Death in Safety

Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health

The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’

The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health

Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)

No Good Reason to Follow Reason

More Posts from this Category

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • simon p cassin on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • simon p cassin on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Rob long on How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • Rob Long on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Rob Long on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Matt Thorne on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • simon p cassin on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Hurak Learning on How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • Rob Long on An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Paul Gentles on An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Brent Charlton on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Rob Long on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Brian on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Jaise on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Rob Long on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Linda McKendry on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Rob long on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Matt Thorne on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Anonymous on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • Proving Safety
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • Road Safety Slogans 2023
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • ISO 45003 and What it Cannot Do
  • NATIONAL SAFETY DAY/WEEK IN INDIA 2023
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • 15 Safety Precautions When Working With Electricity

Recent Posts

  • Not Just Another ‘Hazard’
  • Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • Free Download – Real Risk – New Book by Dr Robert Long
  • Proving Safety
  • ISO 45003 and What it Cannot Do
  • Harming People in the Name of Good
  • An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Risk and Safety Maturity
  • The KISS of Death in Safety
  • SPoR, Metanoia and a Podcast on Change with Nippin Anand
  • Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health
  • The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’
  • SPoR Comes to Vienna June 2023
  • The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • The Visionary Imagination – Louisa Lawson
  • Heaven ‘n Hell and the Safety Religion
  • Confirmity in Conformity
  • Numerology and Psychic Numbing
  • Thinking of Mortality
  • Safety is the Wrong Anchor
  • Foresight Blindness, Hindsight Bias and Risk
  • Getting the Balance Right in Tackling Risk
  • What is SPoR?
  • How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Afraid to Let Go of What Doesn’t Work in Safety
  • When You Don’t Know What to do in Safety, Have Another Blitz!!!
  • Gloves and Glasses Compliance
  • A Case of Desensitisation – What Would You Do?
  • How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • The Mythic Symbology of Safety
  • Dark Waters, The True Story of DuPont and Zero
  • 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Am I stupid? I didn’t think of that…
  • Don’t Look Now Safety, Your Metaphor is Showing
  • Ratio Delusions and Heinrich’s Hoax
  • To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Culture as a Wicked Problem, for Safety
  • Safety Leadership Training
  • Cultural Orientation in Risk
  • The Stanford Experiment and The Social Psychology of Risk
  • Objectivity, Audits and Attribution When Calculating Risk
  • Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?
  • Zero, The Seeking of Infinity
  • Safety Leadership Essentials
  • What Can Indiana Jones Tell Us About Culture
  • Safety as a Worldview
  • The Loathing of Limits
  • Culture Cannot be Framed Through Safety

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

Embodiment, Risk and Safety

The Common Sense Fallacy

Safety Myopia

Risk as a ‘Leap of Faith’

Incrementalism, Catastrophism and All That’s In-between

Safety is an Art

Themes and Concepts in Risk – Requests

Selling Out Safety

The Real Barriers to Safety

The Language of Priorities

The Conundrum in Discerning Risk

Zero Accident Vision Non-Sense

Visualising Risk

WHS Legislation is NOT about Safety it’s about Culture

The Ethics of Safety

Real Risk for Real Life

The Idealization of Humans and The Zero Delusion

‘Pause and Ponder’ – what we can learn from social psychology academics

Risk, Safety and Fundamental Attribution Error

iCue Listening Engagement Manual

Understanding Just Culture

Look With Your Heart and Not With Your Eyes

Safety-1, Safety-2, Safety-3

Its all About Behaviours

A Letter To The Editor

The Social Psychology of Distance-Safety

THE INFLUENCE OF VISUAL STIMULI ON THE UNCONSCIOUS

Real Risk – Free Download

Safe Work Australia Continues to Perpetuate Safety Mythology

The Dynamics of Dehumanisation

How Do Workers Make Decisions?

Understanding Safety as an Archetype

Making Sense of Semiotics and Safety

Semiotics and the Unconscious Messages We Send

Social Psychology of Risk Challenge

Process driven or People driven? What’s your Focus?

The Binary Barnacle

The Shaping of SPoR Intelligence, Skills and Competence in Risk

No Help for Mental Health in Zero

The Different Levels of Wrongness!

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,500 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?


WHAT IS PSYCHOSOCIAL SAFETY