• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Health and Safety and Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • BIGGEST COLLECTION of WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Psychosocial Safety
    • Resiliencing
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychosocial Safety
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety
      • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
      • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
      • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
      • What is Psychosocial Safety
      • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
      • What is Psychological Safety?
      • Understanding Psychological Terminology
      • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
      • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
      • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / CLLR / Heinrich’s Propaganda

Heinrich’s Propaganda

October 4, 2018 by Admin 4 Comments

Guest post by one of the USA based students in The Centre for Leadership and Learning in Risk (CLLR) online program https://cllr.com.au/online-courses-overseas-students/

Heinrich’s Propaganda

imageVirtually everyone that works in the safety industry has seen and is familiar with “The Hienrich pyramid”. The pyramid, and its underlying ideology, permeates virtually every employer’s health and safety program. Based on a book written in 1931 by Herbert William Heinrich, the model infers that if one focuses on near misses and first aid cases found at the bottom of the pyramid, this will lead to a reduction or elimination in lost time injuries and deaths at the top of the pyramid.

Those inferences are inaccurate and misleading (one example of many is the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010 in which 11 people killed on the same day they were celebrating 7 years without a lost time injury). The mindset created by this produces cultural by-products that are antithetical to making sense of risk. Despite this, Heinrich’s pyramid continues to be used as a propaganda tool for workplace safety that amplifies the ideology of “zero harm” and “all injuries are preventable”.

How and why would an occupation like safety, that purports to reduce harm in the workplace, continue to uphold a semiotic artifact that creates a self-defeating discourse? A closer look at the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) can shed some light.

The perception, or “feeling”, of risk is a complex phenomenon. It is subjective and can be distorted and manipulated by multiple processes. SARF uses research from fields such as sociology, psychology, anthropology, and communications theory. It gives an overview on the way communication of risk events are transmitted from the sender through intermediate stations and finally to a receiver. These processes interact with the hazard, and either amplifies or attenuates the perception of risk. That perception then modifies our behavioral responses to the risk (Kasperson., et. al. 1988) in one way or another.

By and large, the methodology of assessing risk in the safety industry does not utilize (and is ignorant of) the SARF model, nor does it consider risk in its full social context and complexity. The methodology behind the pyramid focuses narrowly on the probability of events and the magnitude of specific consequences. (Kasperson 177). Yet the evidence clearly shows there are a series of heuristics and biases that govern risk perception. Most people have much more comprehensive conception of risk, and there are a myriad of factors that influence our perception of risk (Kasperson 178).

When one filters risk events through the ideology of the pyramid, a discourse of blame, punishment and dehumanization begins to take shape. Because of the discourse and trajectory created by absolutes like “all injuries are preventable”, the cause for events at the bottom of the pyramid (near misses, first aid injuries) get misattributed to “safety is a choice you make”. Using the SARF, we see how the communication of a risk event (e.g. cut finger) gets transmitted from the sender (investigators looking the into the “root cause” of the cut finger) through intermediate stations (the ideology created by the belief in the pyramid) and finally to the receiver (management/employees react with added rules, regulations). When we follow this interaction with individual psychological, social and cultural factors, we see how the perceptions of risk are amplified. This also helps the safety industry to (in their minds) validate the ideology of “zero harm” or “all incidents are preventable”.

The ripple effects of this is evident in the continued use of behavior based safety (BBS) as a way to control and manage issues at the bottom of the pyramid. One of the many issues with BBS is management often believes that once a particular risk has been identified, that a specific, prescribed behavior will result. But since risk is subjective, the reaction to a particular risk will vary from one person to the next. Fundamentalist authority (BBS, absolutist, binary logic thinking) rules, controls and enforces, but it does not develop ownership. It alienates and marginalizes itself from the very people it seeks to win over. (Long 43 – Risk Make Sense).

Further evidence of pyramid propaganda is the fundamental attribution error regarding safety metrics. It is common for a company to be labeled as “safe” if their safety metrics are at or below a certain level. Aside from planting the seeds of hubris in the organization (one of many hidden layers of risk), a host of other issues are created such as underreporting of injuries and the objectification employees.

Additionally, resources that would (or should) be helping employees learn how to make sense of risk are diverted from doing so. Instead, hours upon hours are spent at a desk or in meetings tracking, collecting and analyzing injury data. More distortion of reality occurs because these metrics get misattributed as evidence of a safe work culture. This amplification of safety metrics has now ballooned into an oppressive stream of bureaucracy and paperwork. The bureaucracy created by safety metrics has gotten to the point that an entire industry has evolved whose sole purpose is to manage the paperwork and bureaucracy created by the propaganda of the pyramid.

Paradoxically, the propaganda of the pyramid attenuates the fallibility of humans. By framing workplace incidents as a conscious, discretionary behaviors (labels such as “stupid”, “lazy” or “common sense” are typical) a discourse that fallibility is a weakness is sewn into the fabric of the culture. As a result an ideology of perfectionism (that understands its own success by the absence of human error) both alienates employees and promotes fear and uncertainty.

There is good news; ways to subversively counteract the propaganda and spin of the pyramid do exist. To begin, it is essential to understand and recognize the impact that the discourse (https://safetyrisk.net/zero-discourse-and-perfectionism/ ) and trajectory (https://safetyrisk.net/the-trajectory-of-zero-vision/ ) of the language and semiotics in an organization have on its culture. Building on that, the pyramid’s hidden curriculum (https://safetyrisk.net/until-nothing-changes-in-safety/ ) can be surfaced and a more humanizing, learning environment can evolve. Finally getting beyond the propaganda will require a move toward critical thinking (https://safetyrisk.net/critical-thinking-and-questioning-in-safety/ ), which is not necessarily “being critical” but would include acquiring and using skills such as self-reflection, independent research ability, determining relevance, identifying biases and Socratic questioning.

Not an easy task to be sure, but then again the oppressive propaganda spread by the Heinrich pyramid did not happen overnight either.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: CLLR Tagged With: heinrich

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bernard Corden says

    October 16, 2018 at 2:15 PM

    Dear Dave,

    Whenever I see the pyramid and hear the safety evangelist I reach for my revolver and my poor pet goldfish in the accommodation donga suffers from advanced attention deficit disorder.

    Reply
  2. Rob Long says

    October 16, 2018 at 7:48 AM

    S. Saran. For something to be scientific and logical requires evidence and argument against counter evidence. There is neither in Heinrich’s book. Indeed, the evidence is overwhelming that the logic of the pyramid is false. Heinrich himself acknowledges that the pyramid is a ‘philosophy’ (p.12) in ‘Industrial Accident Prevention’ (1959) and defines safety as accident prevention. Indeed, his axioms he called ‘self-evident truths’ (p.20) in his 1931 publication which he later withdrew and doubted but he never shifted from that engineering-focused philosophy. Interestingly, his whole model is based on objects and energy with no clear anthropological clarity even though he calls his work a ‘philosophy’. He asserts on p.62 that ‘accidents are controllable’ and later acknowledges the existence of ‘common sense’ (p.64). Although he advocates for the collection of data, he produces none but writes the book based upon his mechanistic and positivist assumptions in behaviourist theory. The work is astoundingly dated and naturally lacks all we know today through cognitive and neuropsychology. The Heinrich delusion includes no discussion of human decision making, the nature of the human mind or the notion of unpredicability/fallibility. Unfortunately, it continues to influence the safety industry and is still in text books. I wonder what other industry would base its thinking in 2018 on a text from 1931???

    Reply
  3. S. Saran says

    October 16, 2018 at 2:11 AM

    There are two major wrong statements made in the essay. First, Heinrich never said that all accidents are preventable. In his book “Industrial Accident Prevention 1931″, Heinrich has clearly written that ” …….2% of the accidents are not preventable”. Secondly, Heinrich has written that since the root of the minor, serious and fatal accidents lie in the thousands of unsafe acts and conditions (that lie at the base of the pyramid), he advised managements to take the “near miss accidents” also seriously and to investigate it and take corrective measures. Hence, I find the “pyramid triangle”due to Heinrich very logical and scientific.

    Reply
    • Dave Collins says

      October 16, 2018 at 9:28 AM

      I can see why safety people want the pyramid to be logical, scientific and true but, when you have limited resources, where are they best focused? Unfortunately, Safety tends to go for the low hanging fruit which, although time consuming, is easy to identify, available in abundance, easy to count and easy to control in the hope that it will affect the next layer up on the pyramid they then label the process “Zero Harm”. There are too many examples of celebrations of long periods without minor injury and excessive hubris followed by major disaster ie Deepwater Horizon. There is a good reason why, in Australia anyway, SWMS are only required for high risk construction tasks and yet Safety, in the pursuit of zero, wants them for tying safety shoe laces and making a cup of tea – this rubbish just takes valuable resources away from managing the critical risks. It’s hard for me to imagine how controlling paper cuts and twisted ankles can prevent a bridge from collapsing but, unfortunately, I can imagine how that process could indirectly contribute to it collapsing.

      Reply

Do you have any thoughts? Please share them belowCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,521 other subscribers.

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Recent Comments

  • Rob Long on Semiotic Methods to Help Tackle Risk
  • BRENT R CHARLTON on Semiotic Methods to Help Tackle Risk
  • Rob Long on Semiotic Methods to Help Tackle Risk
  • Jason Martell on Semiotic Methods to Help Tackle Risk
  • Rob Long on Critical Sources of Harm Ignored by Safety=Zero
  • simon p cassin on Critical Sources of Harm Ignored by Safety=Zero
  • Matt Thorne on Book Launch – SPoR and Semiotics, Methods to Tackle Risk
  • Rob Long on A Book to Help Get You Started on Cultural Improvement in Risk
  • Matt Thorne on Book Launch – SPoR and Semiotics, Methods to Tackle Risk
  • Peter Saaman on Book Launch – SPoR and Semiotics, Methods to Tackle Risk
  • Rob Long on Book Launch – SPoR and Semiotics, Methods to Tackle Risk
  • Brian on Having Meetings Without ‘Meeting’
  • Shannon Barter on Embracing Risk–Video
  • Brent Charlton on Wo-Men in Safety
  • Robert Long on Wo-Men in Safety
  • Need to Stay employed on Embracing Risk–Video
  • Anonymous on How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
  • Anonymous on How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
  • Anonymous on Deconstructing iCam, Useful or Useless
  • Anonymous on Deconstructing iCam, Useful or Useless

RECOMMENDED READING

viral post – iso 45003 and what it cannot do

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

Psychosocial Safety and Mental Health Series

Don’t be Obsessed with Safety

A Guide to Psychosocial Safety Skills

Mindfulness is NOT Brain-fullness and other Psychosocial Myths

Have You Had a Drink of SafeTea?

If You Can’t Manage Fallibility, You’ll Never Tackle Psychosocial Health

Embodiment, Myth and Psychosocial Risk

7 Golden Rules that are NOT Golden

Why Zero Vision Can Never Tackle Mental Health

If Psychosocial Health Matters, Stop Hot Desking

Effective Strategies in Mental Health at Work

More Posts from this Category

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Footer

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • Christmas Safety Messages, Toolbox Talks, Safety Moments and Slogans
  • There is no Fast and Slow Thinking, Nor Quick Learning
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • Fragility, Resilience and AntiFragility in Risk
  • BIGGEST COLLECTION of WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS, CHECKISTS, REGISTERS, TEMPLATES and APPS
  • Christmas Safety Poem
  • Icebreakers and Games that Safety Trainers Play
  • Christmas Safety Messages, Poems, Tips and Articles

Recent Posts

  • There is no Fast and Slow Thinking, Nor Quick Learning
  • Fragility, Resilience and AntiFragility in Risk
  • The Sponsors of Zero Are
  • Why Zero Cannot Understand the Basics of Safety – ALARP and Due Diligence
  • No Room for Ethics in a Zero ‘Mindset’
  • Zero Harm and the Fear of Failure
  • Semiotic Methods to Help Tackle Risk
  • Top 10 Simple Things You Can Do To Dramatically Improve Safety
  • SPoR and Semiotics, A Conversation – Free Download
  • The Traffic in Zero Only Goes One Way
  • Critical Sources of Harm Ignored by Safety=Zero
  • Zero and a Culture of Denial
  • Shaping Change to Zero
  • A Book to Help Get You Started on Cultural Improvement in Risk
  • Risk Intelligence and What to Do About It – A Video
  • Feel Good Safety and Un-Ethical Ego-Centrism
  • Book Launch – SPoR and Semiotics, Methods to Tackle Risk
  • When Zero Doesn’t Work, Don’t Change Anything
  • Having Meetings Without ‘Meeting’
  • Leaders in Safety are NOT Gurus
  • Method and Message Congruence in Risk
  • Guilt and Shame, The By-Products of Safety-Zero
  • Update on Zero Survey, Just believe!
  • Zero is NOT the Only Acceptable Number
  • Don’t be Obsessed with Safety
  • Zero Ideology as Maximum Offense, Zero Benefit
  • Embracing Risk–Video
  • Hey CEO? Does Zero Apply to You?
  • OHS Voices from the Resistance – Rosa Carrillo
  • A Guide to Psychosocial Safety Skills
  • A Guide to Tokenism in Ethics in Safety
  • The Questions You Ask in Safety are Showing?
  • Introduction to SPoR, SEEK and Culture
  • What is Safety? Video
  • Understanding Motivation is Essential to Understanding Risk
  • Semiotic and Poetic Literacy for Safety
  • Speak Up, but Don’t Tackle the Cause
  • KISS Safety in a VUCA World
  • OHS Voices From the Resistance – Book review
  • Wo-Men in Safety
  • SPoR Podcasts Back Up and Running
  • What is Semiotics? – Video
  • Finding Balance in SPoR
  • Zero as Extremist Ideology
  • Understanding Cults and Safety/Zero
  • Dot to Dot Safety for Non-Professionals
  • Two New Videos from Novellus
  • Mindfulness is NOT Brain-fullness and other Psychosocial Myths
  • The Safety Belief System
  • The Nonsense of ‘Safety Awareness’

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

The Hero Myth in Modern Management

The Futility of the Centralised Safety Management System?

Risk Boldly

All Risk is Subjective

Listening, Learning, Helping and Caring about Risk

Coronavirus and the Dunny Paper Effect

SPoR and Myth

Deepwater Horizon and The Suppression of Risky Conversations

Making Sense of Safety Management Systems

Zero Accident Vision Non-Sense

Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick

The Seduction to Simplify Safety

Speaking a New Language in Safety

Stand Behind The Yellow Line – Do Engineering Controls Affect Risk?

By What Method Do You Tackle Risk?

And the Enemy of Safety is? … Humans!

Who is the Enemy and What War is Safety Fighting?

Traditional Safety

Social Sensemaking – Free eBook

A Critique of Pure Reason

Update on SPoR in India, Brazil and Europe

What Does Misinformation Do in Safety?

The Myth of Fast and Slow Thinking

The Fear of Power and the Power of Fear

Bounded Rationality–How Can Too Much Safety Be Bad For You?

Starting Points, Worldviews and Risk

Anchoring, Framing and Priming Risk

Who Gives a Toss?

Clarity Enabled

The Social Psychology of Risk Handbook, i-thou

The Domino Delusion in Safety

The Triarchic Mind, Risk and Safety

How do we mourn?

Ten Risk and Safety Program Essentials

How Do We Know?

Why is Safety an Easy Target?

Is Complacency Evil?

A must watch risk and safety video

Censorship and Taboos in Safety

Who is Responsible?

More Posts from this Category

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,521 other subscribers.

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?


WHAT IS PSYCHOSOCIAL SAFETY