• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Safety Risk .net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

Discover More on this Site

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE RESOURCES
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • PSYCHOLOGY OF SAFETY & RISK
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Covid-19
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Covid-19 Returning to Work Inductions, Transitioning, Safety Start Up and Re Entry Plans
    • Covid-19 Work from Home Safety Checklists and Risk Assessments
    • The Hierarchy of Control and Covid-19
    • Why Safety Loves Covid-19
    • Covid-19, Cricket and Lessons in Safety
    • The Covid-19 Lesson
    • Safety has this Covid-19 thing sorted
    • The Heart of Wisdom at Covid Time
    • How’s the Hot Desking Going Covid?
    • The Semiotics of COVID-19 and the Social Amplification of Risk
    • Working From Home Health and Safety Tips – Covid-19
    • Covid-19 and the Hierarchy of Control
  • Dr Rob Long Posts
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no HIERARCHY of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • Quotes & Slogans
    • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
    • When Slogans Don’t Work
    • 77 OF THE MOST CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
    • 500 BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2020
    • 167 CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Safety Acronyms
    • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
    • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
    • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
    • Safety Slogans List
    • Road Safety Slogans
    • How to write your own safety slogans
    • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
    • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
    • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
    • Safety Slogans for Work

The Fallacy of Marginal Gains and Nudges

March 28, 2021 by Dr Rob Long Leave a Comment

The Fallacy of Marginal Gains and Nudges

1% SaferOne of the characteristics of safety marketing is the continual clutching at straws to motivate and move people towards safety. We see this in the endless campaigns for: pickles, Mums for Safety, Hazardman, meerkats, sexy sofie etc.. It seems anything is justified as long as the word ‘safety’ is spoken, this includes using meaningless metaphors that try to make some connection to tackling risk. What this clutching at straws reveals is that Safety doesn’t really know what to do, other than run another marketing campaign. This is no more evident than in the 1% safer movement.

The idea of 1% safer is based on a measurement/numeric rationale arguing that small/marginal gains make a difference. What should be realized is that this argument is a quantitative argument that states a small numerical gain represents a qualitative outcome. What people don’t often realize is that the discourse (power in language) of the argument is numeric, not human. The language is about shifting a number and not about the essential human need for: care, helping, trust, belonging, forgiveness, understanding etc.

When this argument from quanta comes it states ‘can you make your business one percent safer’ (https://www.shponline.co.uk/leadership-and-innovation/one-percent-safer-book/). This question holds no interest for me and has no connection to the humanizing of safety, its just more numbers (https://www.shponline.co.uk/leadership-and-innovation/one-percent-safer-book/ ). How about Safety asks better questions like: how can we humanize safety? Why is safety not a helping activity? What does it mean to be professional? Why are ‘care ethics’ not the foundation for safety? What activities actually work to improve safety? (https://www.humandymensions.com/product/it-works-a-new-approach-to-risk-and-safety/) or perhaps another question: in whose interests and power does the 1% safer foundation serve? Is openness and transparency part of its ethic? Where dos the money go? And to whom?

Even when Safety argues it is ‘different’ it continues to speak in the language of ‘quanta’.

The marginal gains and 1% argument come from the world of the Olympics and human performance (https://hbr.org/2015/10/how-1-performance-improvements-led-to-olympic-gold). It is quite an Olympic leap to then jump from elite sports performance to the daily process of fallible humans tackling risk.

Of course, what you are not told in this spruiking of marginal gains is that there is no level playing field. Only the richest countries can afford the absurd outpouring of money to make a 1% gain in performance. This is justified by the ideology of gold medals. In Australia, gold medals is a religious pursuit, I would say a mental illness.

Just like zero vision, this 1% gain mindset is an ideology (https://www.svmglobal.com/blog/the-power-of-marginal-gains). Of course, you will never hear in this discourse the notion of fallibility (https://www.humandymensions.com/product/fallibility-risk-living-uncertainty/) or limits to performance. On the logic of this nonsense we should have a human run the 100m in 3 seconds one day.

Of course, what this ideology leads to is cheating, the unethical quest for gold that is now in the bloodstream of elite sports (https://www.forbes.com/sites/roomykhan/2017/12/31/doping-in-sports-cheating-or-leveling-of-the-playing-field/?sh=eadef5275ecf ). Whenever you see an ideology paraded in marketing the first question of a critical thinker should be: what are the by-products? And in safety, zero and 1% safer will lead to unethical outcomes because the numeric measurement of performance has now been made the goal. Lower order goals are always in dialectic with higher order goals (https://safetyrisk.net/goals-and-vision-in-safety/). The outcome of zero is not better safety but more brutal safety, more dehumanizing safety. This is because the ideology of the number governs the ethic.

Marginal gain and nudge theory hide key elements that are unethical. This is the ethic of ‘the end justifies the means’. Its rationale is: I can override your individual autonomy and manipulate your thinking because it gives the outcome I want. This is how we get such nonsense as ‘check your gut and do the right thing’ (https://safetyrisk.net/the-aihs-bok-and-ethics-check-your-gut/), the perfect deontological ethic to justify brutalism.

Nudge theory argues that manipulation of people is justified by the outcome, but at no time is the outcome and whom it serves questioned. Nudge theory comes out of ‘behavioural science’, hardly where one would expect some sense of expertise in ethics (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/phc3.12658 ). Similarly in Safety, this argument is ‘as long as injury rates are reduced the means is justified’. I call this brutalism, others call it 1% safer.

In the end, the nudge theory of 1% safer is neither a method or a strategy (https://safetyrisk.net/essential-elements-for-a-safety-strategy/) for anything. It is a marketing idea that is attributed to something that doesn’t exist, in the naïve belief that people will be motivated to improve behaviour because they have been fed a statistic. In short, it’s a con and doesn’t work. In a year it will be a new bell, whistle or yo-yo (https://safetyrisk.net/the-yo-yo-delusion-and-conversations-about-risk/) and the lemmings will fall in line once again with open wallets and wonder why safety doesn’t improve.

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • The Spirit of Zero - April 15, 2021
  • The Tyranny of Time in Risk - April 14, 2021
  • The ‘Feeling’ and ‘Being’ of Safety - April 13, 2021
  • Please Don’t Use the ‘F’ Word in Safety - April 13, 2021
  • The Voodoo of The Hoodoo - April 9, 2021
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Robert Long Tagged With: 1% safer, marginal gains, nudge, one percent safer

Reader Interactions

Do you have any thoughts? Please share them below Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

Visit Count – Started Jan 2015

  • 22,024,657 Visitors

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join over 30,000 other discerning safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Bernard Corden on The Fields of Athenry
  • Rob Long on The Tyranny of Time in Risk
  • Bernard Corden on The Tyranny of Time in Risk
  • Bernard Corden on Professional Conferences Are A Sleazy Con
  • Rob Long on The Heinrich Hoodoo
  • Admin on The Heinrich Hoodoo
  • Nicholas Sanders on The Heinrich Hoodoo
  • Admin on The Heinrich Hoodoo
  • Admin on The Gemba Safety Walk
  • Sean Walker on The Gemba Safety Walk

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Featured Downloads

  • ATMs and ATM Cards (1345 downloads)
  • How To Make Your Own Cloth Face Mask (187297 downloads)
  • Walking is Still Our Best Medicine (7840 downloads)
  • Electrical_Equipment_Risk_Assessment_v2.0-1.doc (7479 downloads)
  • HOTEL-RESORT-RISK-CHECKLIST.doc (8856 downloads)
  • Real Risk by Dr Rob Long (892 downloads)
  • Parking Lot Safety Moment (8610 downloads)
  • Learning-How-to-Facilitate-Learning.docx (1790 downloads)
  • Stretching At The Workstation (2424 downloads)
  • Tunneling Risk Assessment (183 downloads)
  • Plant Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Form (642 downloads)
  • What_it_means_to_be_an_OHS_professional (7715 downloads)
  • Supervising Children Around Water (7397 downloads)
  • Risk Assessment Template (659 downloads)
  • Linz Workshop-17_18-Jan.pdf (556 downloads)

Recent Posts

  • The Spirit of Zero
  • The Tyranny of Time in Risk
  • The ‘Feeling’ and ‘Being’ of Safety
  • Please Don’t Use the ‘F’ Word in Safety
  • The Voodoo of The Hoodoo
  • The Heinrich Hoodoo
  • CLLR Newsletter–April 2021
  • Deconstruction and Reconstruction for Safety
  • The Politics of Safety Legitimization
  • An Ethic in Error for Safety

Footer

AUTHORS

  • Alan Quilley
    • Heinrich–Industrial Accident Prevention
    • The Problem With ZERO Goals and Results
  • Bernard Corden
    • Blinded by the Light
    • Covid 1984 – The Shake Hands Maskerade and Vial Diplomacy
  • Bill Sims
    • Employee Engagement: Chocolate, Vanilla, or Strawberry?
    • Injury Hiding-How do you stop it?
  • Craig Clancy
    • Task Based vs Activity Based Safe Work Method Statements
    • Safety And Tender Submissions
  • Daniel Kirk
    • It’s easy being wise after the event.
    • A Positive Safety Story
  • Dave Whitefield
    • Safety is about…
    • Safety and Compliance
  • Dennis Millard
    • Are You Risk Intelligent?
    • Honey they get me! They get me at work!
  • Drewie
    • Downturn Doin’ Your Head In? Let’s Chat….
    • How was your break?
  • Gabrielle Carlton
    • All Care and No Care!
    • You Are Not Alone!
  • George Robotham
    • How to Give an Unforgettable Safety Presentation
    • How To Write a Safety Report
  • Goran Prvulovic
    • Safety Manager – an Ultimate Scapegoat
    • HSE Performance – Back to Basics
  • James Ellis
    • In search of plan B in workers’ recovery
    • What and how should we measure to support recovery from injury?
  • James Parkinson
    • To laugh or not to laugh
    • People and Safety
  • John Toomey
    • Who is Responsible for This?
    • Who Are Your People?
  • Karl Cameron
    • Abby Normal Safety
    • The Right Thing
  • Ken Roberts
    • Safety Legislation Is Our Biggest Accident?
    • HSE Trip Down Memory Lane
  • Mark Perrett
    • Psychology of Persuasion: Top 5 influencing skills for getting what you want
  • Mark Taylor
    • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
    • Enculturing Safety
  • Max Geyer
    • WHS Legislation is NOT about Safety it’s about Culture
    • Due Diligence Is Not Just Ticking Boxes!
  • Matt Thorne
    • It was the SIA until someone wanted to swing from the Chandelier
    • Common Sense is Remarkably Uncommon
  • Peter Ribbe
    • Is there “Common Sense” in safety?
    • Who wants to be a safety professional?
  • Phil LaDuke
    • Professional Conferences Are A Sleazy Con
    • Hey Idiots, You’re Worried About the Wrong Things
  • Admin
    • CLLR Newsletter–April 2021
    • Zero is not a Target or Vision, it’s a Language/Discourse
  • Dr Rob Long
    • The Spirit of Zero
    • The Tyranny of Time in Risk
  • Rob Sams
    • I’m just not that into safety anymore
    • Social ‘Resiliencing’
  • Barry Spud
    • Barry Spud’s Hazard Control Tips
    • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
  • Sheri Suckling
    • How Can I Get the Boss to Listen?
  • Safety Nerd
    • The Block isn’t portraying safety as it should be
    • Toolbox Talk Show–PPE
  • Wynand Serfontein
    • Why The Problem With Learning Is Unlearning
    • I DON’T KNOW
  • Zoe Koskinas
    • Why is fallibility so challenging in the workplace?

FEATURED POSTS

Banning Head Protection is Safer

Understanding Psychological Terminology

Models From Social Sensemaking

Process driven or People driven? What’s your Focus?

ADVENTURES IN RISK AND SAFETY–KING ZERO

Gesture in Risk Matters

safety compliance

You Don’t Want a Compliance Culture

Keep Your Head In the Game

Safety as Avoidance

Amping it Up in Safety

A Culture of Care (and sackings…)

WARNING: Not Your Typical Safety Nonsense

Foundations of Perception and Imagination in Risk

Centre for Leadership and Learning in Risk (CLLR)–Study Calendar

The Village Effect

non-Leadership in Risk

Thinking About Harm

Does Safety Have A Soul?

Tackling the Reality of Harm

Bounded Rationality–How Can Too Much Safety Be Bad For You?

More Posts from this Category

Paperwork

https://vimeo.com/162034157?loop=0

Due Diligence

https://vimeo.com/162493843?loop=0

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.