• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • 500 OF THE BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychological Safety
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
    • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
    • What is Psychological Safety?
    • Understanding Psychological Terminology
    • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
    • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
    • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / Covid-19 / Don’t Step on Nails

Don’t Step on Nails

June 16, 2020 by Admin 7 Comments

Guest Post by SafetySue

imageWhen Covid hit, the next thing I found myself doing was assigning e-learning courses to employees on how to wash their hands. Granted, there is a skill to achieving disinfection through hand washing, but lately there is a lot of required safety training for some of the most mundane actions which I think is silly.

I want to pause here because I know what many of you are thinking. ‘If the training was properly done, properly measured, followed-up on in the workplace…then we will see an improvement in safety.’ Don’t get me wrong, I love learning & development, I love to facilitate training courses, and I love to develop instruction. I have seen it done well. But there has been an explosion in safety e-learning, training courses and the tool box talk materials but the content seems childish for a skilled workforce.

I am sure there are many reasons for this; technology is a driving force, as are customer requirements overlapping with regulatory requirements overlapping with management system mandates. But what is the root cause of this? Why are we creating so much e-learning, toolbox talks and procedures that continually push out safety information, a lot of which seems to be generic factual information. Let’s start with the definition of safety.

Recently, we have read some interesting re-worked definitions of safety – for example – “safety is not the absence of negatives, it is the presence of the capacity” (Retrieved June 15, 2020 from https://www.nerc.com/pa/rrm/hp/2016_Human_Performance_Confrence/1%20-%20NERC_HP_TConklin.pdf). I have gone with this definition for a couple of years now and it made sense to me but it has done nothing to stop the endless creation of yet more safety courses, toolbox talks, posters and procedures to increase. To build “capacity” we are filling up employee heads with safety information. We have missed the point all together; perhaps the word “capacity” has not been that helpful.

I work in an industrial workplace and the work performed is risky. There is a comprehensive safety management system in place including of course the usual repertoire of required safety training courses, toolbox talks, and procedures. The toolbox talks rely on having a supervisor who can transform factual safety knowledge and pull off something engaging, but this is not about improving supervisors’ ability to deliver dry facts in an engaging way. It’s about getting away from the facts. And here comes the challenge.

Something has restricted our approach to safety for workplace injury prevention. And then it hit me – safety is an “it” – a thing to be achieved, a capacity. Safety is some-thing that can be deliberately achieved if employees try hard enough to keep their attention focused on “it”. Safety awareness and information campaigns serve as constant reminders to stay alert to “it” so vigilance does not wane. Hence the onslaught of e-learning courses, toolbox talks, written procedures – which tell employees how to accomplish safety. For someone to know how not to step on nails, doesn’t someone need to know how to walk? For us to help prevent stepping on nails, don’t we have to know how employees are walking?

I don’t think all those safety e-learning courses are doing anything but imparting rational knowledge in the hopes that when it does become relevant that the employee will be able to pull it out of memory and apply it. It is an overly cognitive approach, steeped in our belief that our rational cognitive minds can control our daily working actions. So safety is a “thing”, some “thing” that can be achieved and we speak about it often without reference to any work context.

I revisited the previous definition of safety (absence of negatives) and found a gem. What if “safety” does not exist as a separate objective entity? What if safety is tacitly present, until it is not, and we notice we are unsafe? Suppose safety only acquires a separate existence when it is lost – that is, when injury or incident occurs. This helps explain why we may see safety as the absence of negatives – and why it is only when something negative occurs that safety gets our attention. If nothing bad is happening then every thing is safe, so carry on. Although safety being defined as the absence of negatives has been dismissed by safety thought leaders recently, I wonder if we dismissed it too quickly without adequate thought about why it has persisted to be thought of this way. If we have went with something for decades maybe there is a truth in there somewhere.

I accept there are multiple definitions of safety, and we need to choose one that makes sense for our objectives. My objective is to help create a safe workplace where workers go home every day better than they were when they arrived to work. Yes, a platitude of the safety professional, but if that is my goal then I have to look at my tactics. I can’t achieve that objective if I push out pedantic e-learning courses and safe work procedures on how not to step on nails. I believe those who work in a safety role want to convey practical understanding of risk and risk control, but providing theoretical knowledge puts safety out there on its own, as a thing that is separate from work.

What if safety on the job is as much a part of the world of work as the arms and legs of the workers doing the work? Safety takes place in situations of involvement in a practice. Can an analytic description of how to not step on nails keep one from stepping on nail in practice? I don’t think so. Safety is more subtle than that. Safety is not an object, something separate from work. Safety is tacit.

So what is tacit safety? Using a socio-cultural lens, Gherardi & Nicolini (2002) indicated it is pre-reflexive, social, open-ended, provisional and subject to local negotiation. To be knowledgeable in safety you need to participate, and that means you will interact with others, in a group community or local culture, and this will in turn provide you with interpretation of how to work safely.

So how do you work safely? Well, it begins with working for sure, not with e-learning. And working means you have acquired practical understanding of how to perform that work. Practical understanding is often tacit in performing skilled work. The tacit dimension is not conscious and so safety tactics that are aimed at the conscious, rational mind cannot connect to the unconscious, tacit mind. My point is that our training courses, toolbox talks and procedures are an add-on, aimed at the rational, knowledge-seeking conscious brain. But if safety does not exist there, we are missing a huge opportunity. To constitute the safety fabric we need shared repertoires, communal resources, common language and routines, and shared artefacts and stories (Gherardi & Nicolini, 2002).

Safety-II (Hollnagel, 2013) is another development that has emerged in the safety industry and one of its premises it to look at successful work as well as unsuccessful incidents in order to learn. Okay, this is a good start, but this is harder than it sounds. How do we learn about how work is safely performed? Well, we need to know how work is performed and find out how safety is incorporated into the fundamental actions of getting work done. This type of safety practice requires attention to less grand things. It implies we need to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with employees as they perform their work. We need to listen to the language, pay attention to the subtle ways micro-decisions are made – we need to get onto employees’ wave lengths instead of telling employees to get on our safety train. Instead of pushing safety information out to employees, we need to get out and get into the mindset of employees.

We can look for drift, normalization of deviation, procedural variations, work-arounds and all those other sexy things advocated by Safety-II, but I think we need to be much more modest in our approach. Mike Rowe had a TV show called “Dirtiest Jobs” where he performed less than desirable, risky tasks. We may not be able to perform the work our employees perform, but we can put our boots on their ground and be there enough to learn how work gets done. And that’s where we will find out about the messy details of how work gets done. And it’s those messy details that we will find opportunity for improving decisions that impact outcomes.

When I explain what I do for a living, I say “I watch people work”. Learning is participation. Learning cannot happen if you do not participate in the workplace where work is getting done. Even if you yourself are not performing the work (and I have gotten to perform quite a few interesting tasks over the years!), you need to be there and you need to be focused on learning. The field of learning & development recognizes learning in the workflow and you may hear about the term learning at the “point of work”. Safety at the ‘point-of-work’ is the essence of what we need to learn in order to improve.

So that brings me to a final and scary conclusion, and that is the ability of someone working in safety to do this. It’s not about standing and watching people work, it’s about infiltrating the work in fine detail to find where decision making can be improved. Since thousands of tacit micro-decisions are made daily, employees won’t be able to articulate it for us, so this all takes time. Unless you have informant-an employee who is skilled at performing the work and who also is willing and able to comprehend how the many micro-decisions made when performing the work could have implications for safe or unsafe outcomes- you may find yourself out of your comfort zone, out of your element, resorting to generic life-saving rules.

And this is where it gets really scary. Safety curriculums teach someone how to create procedures, training courses, toolbox talks. So if you employ safety professionals what will you get? Procedures, training courses, toolbox talks e.g. “today we are talking about how not to step on nails”.

Safety has progressively grown into an industry which creates safety professionals who are generically skilled at creating training courses, toolbox talks and procedures – who have the capacity to churn out much factual safety information, but who are actually useless on their own. Although worldwide we see the safety industry evolving towards being a professional occupation, although there are safety certifications, curriculums and post nominals, the best “safety person” in your workplace may be one of the employees.

Simple and superficial safety facts get no traction at the point-of-work. And the point-of-work is where safety is enacted, or not, by employees. The point-of-work is a space of experience, interaction, and practice. If you want to improve safety, you have to find and improve elemental work practices, and this is why employees are the best source of safety.

So, if you want to get people to stop stepping on nails, don’t assign an e-learning course. Instead, find out how people walk through the yard in different contexts.

· Gherardi, Silvia & Nicolini, Davide. (2002). Learning the Trade: A Culture of Safety in Practice. Organization. 9. 191-223. 10.1177/1350508402009002264.

· Hollnagel, E. (2013). A Tale of Two Safeties, Nuclear Safety and Simulation, Vol. 4, Number 1, p. 385–422.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Covid-19, Safety Training Tagged With: e-learning, Hollnagel, Safety-II, Toolbox Talks

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Cipriano Corva says

    June 18, 2020 at 12:23 AM

    I agree with M. Polanyi (although I do not know him).

    Safety (the Science and Practice) is not an “it”. My belief, from 55 years of experience in the field, practicing occupational safety and occupational health (from a work perspective), is that we are (or should be) involved in a Transdisciplinary research and practice strategy that crosses many disciplinary boundaries to create, develop and implement a HOLISTIC approach to the PREVENTION of DAMAGE to people; including, physical; mental; emotional; and wellbeing. (allow me to throw in, happiness; a happy worker is a safe and productive person). Keeps the economy going as well.
    May I put to all the readers out there, that history can demonstrate to us, that in this case, the only way a human can be killed at work (performing the work they are employed to do); IS BY COMING INTO CONTACT WITH DAMAGING ENERGIES. (mechanical, electrical, chemical, human, gravitational; etc. . Or the ENERGY CONTACTS the Person. It is not hazard; risk; near hit/miss, unsafe; incident/accident; etc. these are all wicked words that do not help in the prevention of Personal Damage ; Class1 Fatal; or Permanent Total/Partial Disability or Disease.
    Our main FOCUS must be on the proper control of DAMAGING ENERGY.; in all aspects of our societies: at home; school; work; travel; recreation; sport; etc. And from Cradle to Grave.

    For anyone who may be interested in further progressing this discussion and challenge I could ask Admin to post a paper In Honour of George Robotham (dec.) written by Geoff L McDonald (dec.) which also contains: Geoff McDonald Important Concepts; to help our thoughts.
    Best regards; and in memory of my best mate & mentor Geoff McDonald.
    Cip

    Reply
    • Admin says

      June 18, 2020 at 5:06 AM

      I will republish that paper shortly to remember and honour those two gentlemen and their incredible legacies

      Reply
    • rob long says

      June 18, 2020 at 7:14 AM

      Cip, with respect an object is only a risk depending on the decision of a human, the object in itself and whatever it’s hazard makes no decision. If the object holds some static energy in itself it still cannot harm anyone until a human decision is made, I assume this is what you mean by ‘coming in contact with’.

      Reply
  2. rob long says

    June 16, 2020 at 7:12 PM

    Good analysis. How is safety different if the paradigm is quanta? If the insecurity for control and measurement are just the same but in a different package? Sometimes I think the issue is safetyism itself, framing the idea of being safe through the lens of safety ideology, that self confirming mono-disciplinary circle. The real problem again is a lack of transdisciplianrity, hence the ever cyclic navel gazing and going nowhere.

    Reply
    • Jason says

      June 17, 2020 at 4:11 PM

      why the big words?

      Reply
      • rob long says

        June 17, 2020 at 8:42 PM

        What is a big word?

        Reply
  3. bernardcorden says

    June 16, 2020 at 7:46 AM

    “We know more than we can say” – Michael Polanyi

    Reply

Do you have any thoughts? Please share them below Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,495 other subscribers

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

SAFETY MYTHS SERIES

The Mythic Symbology of Safety

Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics

Safety Mythbusters

Don’t Be Emotional! Another Safety Myth

Tackling the Challenge of Heuristics in Safety

The Myth of Normal

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Rob long on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Matt Thorne on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Anonymous on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Jason on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Rob Long on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Admin on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Rob Long on 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Gustavo Saralegui on 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Rob long on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Wynand on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Rob Long on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • simon cassin on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Rob Long on Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?
  • Matt Thorne on Free Online Workshops
  • Rob long on No Good Reason to Follow Reason
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on No Good Reason to Follow Reason
  • Risk Diversity on Book Launch – For the Love of Zero – in Portuguese
  • Rob Long on No Good Reason to Follow Reason
  • Risk Culture Builder on No Good Reason to Follow Reason
  • Mark Taylor on All Things Must Pass in Risk

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • Road Safety Slogans 2023
  • 500 OF THE BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
  • What Is Safety?
  • How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • 15 Safety Precautions When Working With Electricity
  • Safety Acronyms
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat

Recent Posts

  • Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • What is SPoR?
  • How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Afraid to Let Go of What Doesn’t Work in Safety
  • When You Don’t Know What to do in Safety, Have Another Blitz!!!
  • Gloves and Glasses Compliance
  • A Case of Desensitisation – What Would You Do?
  • How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • The Mythic Symbology of Safety
  • Dark Waters, The True Story of DuPont and Zero
  • 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Am I stupid? I didn’t think of that…
  • Don’t Look Now Safety, Your Metaphor is Showing
  • Ratio Delusions and Heinrich’s Hoax
  • To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Culture as a Wicked Problem, for Safety
  • Safety Leadership Training
  • Cultural Orientation in Risk
  • The Stanford Experiment and The Social Psychology of Risk
  • Objectivity, Audits and Attribution When Calculating Risk
  • Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?
  • Zero, The Seeking of Infinity
  • Safety Leadership Essentials
  • What Can Indiana Jones Tell Us About Culture
  • Safety as a Worldview
  • The Loathing of Limits
  • Culture Cannot be Framed Through Safety
  • Free Online Workshops
  • Safety Culture–Hudson’s Model
  • Book Launch – For the Love of Zero – in Portuguese
  • Advancing Backwards in Safety
  • The ‘Noise’ of Safety, Silence and Practicing of Mindfulness
  • All Things Must Pass in Risk
  • I’m just not that into safety anymore
  • Sticks and Stones and the Nonsense of Zero Harm
  • Courting Infallibility in Safety
  • Indicators of Risk
  • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
  • No Good Reason to Follow Reason
  • Just as Well Culture Doesn’t Listen to Safety
  • What Are the Benefits Of Social Psychology of Risk?
  • Short-Sighted Lenses by Safety
  • Is Safety the Empire of Non-Sense?
  • No Wonder Safety is Confused About Culture
  • Building High Performance Safety Cultures
  • Understanding iCue, a Visual, Verbal, Semiotic Method for Tackling Risk
  • On Culture and Safety
  • Focus on ‘Meeting’ people, not legislation – a path to risk maturity
  • The Moral Harm of the Zero Cult
  • The New Leadership – Risk and Safety

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

Dumbs for Safety

Social Sensemaking–New Book Release

International Workshops – Belgium

Fooled by Certainty

Blind Faith in Safety

Safety and Non-Neuroscience

An Engineering Dreamworld

Safety Myopia

The Essentialist Pleasure Of Safety

How I Feel About Risk

Safety Cries Wolf!

Brain-Centredness and Occular-Centredness in Risk

Subjecting and Objecting About Risk

The Problem with Zero Harm

Keep Your Head In the Game

The Sacred Bra Tree

Holistic Well Being in Risk Differently

Dumb Ways to Discourse, a Failed Approach in Safety

Safety is an Art

The Allure of Submission

Acceptable Risk as a Decision Making Process

Talking Risk Video–Anti-Fragility

Can There Be Other Valid Worldviews Than Safety?

A Masters Degree in ‘Tick and Flick’

How Groupthink Works

Independent Thinking in an Uncertain World, A Mind of One’s Own

Impacts of Cognitive Dissonance in the Workplace

Next Free Online Studies Introduction to Social Psychology of Risk

Safety People Don’t ‘Save Lives’

Words Can Change Your Brain

All Risk is Subjective

The Reason Safety Has Gone So Crazy

We need to make sure this can never happen again

Unthinkable

Human Dymensions Feb17 Newsletter and Competition

Social Psychology of Risk – Body of Knowledge

New Video Series on Safety

Courage to Challenge the Great TRIFR and LTIFR Delusion

No Hope for Safety

Talking Risk Video–The Unconscious In Communication

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,495 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?