• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychosocial Safety
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety
      • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
      • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
      • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
      • What is Psychosocial Safety
      • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
      • What is Psychological Safety?
      • Understanding Psychological Terminology
      • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
      • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
      • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / Risk Aversion / Safety Hits a Snag

Safety Hits a Snag

November 18, 2018 by Admin 11 Comments

Safety Hits a Snag

imageThe media and social media in Australia recently lit up over the overcooked Bunnings directive that sausage sizzle volunteers must place onions beneath the sausages in order to prevent slips and falls in their stores – supported by the trite platitude that safety is their “number one priority”. Funny that Bunnings are quite happy to send inexperienced DIYers home with a 9” angle grinder or chainsaw!. Some were perplexed that such a relatively trivial thing could become such a national issue, even inviting comment from our Prime Minister! There is a lesson here for Safety and that is that people have had enough of silly initiatives, covertly forced upon us and defended in the in the name of safety, with prosaic aphorisms – they are not afraid to vehemently express that disdain when there no fear of repercussions (something they would not dare do at work). The supporters of this initiative could do nothing but trot out a 3-year-old example of a customer who allegedly slipped on an onion and settled for a large sum (subject to a non-disclosure agreement). The whole process was certainly not well done……….

Dr Rob Long wrote about this recently in Bunnings Banger Bungle. His co-author of the best-selling book “Risky Conversations”, Greg Smith, has now chimed in with this piece below (recently published HERE). I highly recommend Greg’s latest book, “PAPER SAFE” where he covers the paradox of trivial rules undermining the importance of WHS.

Of Sausages and Onions

There has been a recent outcry across the health and safety community, and others I suspect, about the recent decision of a chain of hardware stores, Bunnings.

If you are reading this outside of Australia, you might not appreciate the full cultural significance of what is happening. For many people, Bunnings is more than a hardware store, it is a Saturday morning ritual, and an important part of that ritual is buying a sausage on piece of white bread, with onions and tomato sauce. Proceeds from this “sausage sizzle” go to charity, and both my daughter and sister-in-law have participated in this fundraising exercise. Having spent the last three decades in various stages of home renovations and handyman projects, I have made a pretty significant contribution to the sausage sizzle myself.

The Bunnings directive to volunteers who man the sausage sizzle has been to place the onions underneath the sausage, not on top of them, for ostensibly occupational safety and health reasons. Bunnings chief operating officer has been quoted in the press as saying they want onions placed underneath the sausage to prevent them falling out and creating a slip hazard.

(See: Bunnings onion directive)

The directive was accompanied by reports of a visitor to Bunnings who slipped on an onion, fell back and hit his head three years ago. The matter was apparently settled out of court and subject to a nondisclosure agreement. This in itself is ironic, because if “safety is always our number one priority” (see the article above) why does Bunnings need to cover up the incident with a nondisclosure agreement, rather than share it? Surely other organisations are confronted with the threat of onion related disasters at sporting events every weekend – what was done to inform them of the risk, in pursuit of this most important “priority”?

In my recent book, Paper Safe: the triumph of bureaucracy in safety management, I wrote about rules, and how many rules in the name of health and safety are seen as trivial and can work to undermine the importance of health and safety in organisations. This certainly seems to be the overwhelming reaction to the Bunnings onion directive – a stupid, unnecessary rule which demeans health and safety and calls it into ridicule.

I certainly think there is room for this type of criticism. I pity the poor health and safety officer who is going to be asked questions about onion safety at every workplace barbecue for years to come.

But there is another side to this conversation. In Paper Safe, I also wrote about “the Handrail Conundrum”.

People falling down stairs at work represents a potential threat to the organisation – at the very least injured workers be entitled to workers compensation. In the same way, people slipping and falling at a business premises represents a threat – there is a very real likelihood of someone seeking legal redress and damages if they are injured.

It is not the risk that is in question here – it is the response to it.

I do not think we can argue there is no risk from the onions, but there is certainly a conversation to be had about an appropriate response to the risk.

I think the most cringeworthy aspect of the story is the silly response – the statement “safety is our number one priority“. Safety is our number one priority just seems like a platitude. We have all heard it said so often and know it is not true in practice. I do not pretend to know Bunning’s real stance on safety, but I cringe every time I hear it said by a corporate spokesperson because it smacks of corporate dishonesty – especially when accompanied by a nondisclosure agreement.

But the real problem with dressing the onion directive up as some sort of “caring” safety response is, in isolation, the onion directive is meaningless.

I mean, is there really evidence that onions underneath the sausage are less likely to fall out than onions on top? Not in my experience of eating them. I would love to know the research that went into this decision-making, or whether somebody just thought it was a good idea without any basis.

Even if there was empirical data to support the onion placement strategy, the strategy is, itself, all but unenforceable. Is there a realistic expectation of being able to enforce compliance with the onion placement directive across the thousands of volunteers who rotate through Bunnings stores across the country every weekend? Perhaps we could appoint the 15-year-old who stands sentry at the main entrance as the onion monitor? I can just imagine the range of conversations they would have to endure, with everyone from hassled tradies running late to get to a job, to frazzled fathers dashing between Saturday morning sporting events with half the team in tow looking for the “right” reticulation head. And yes that is a real thing!

Anyway, fixing the onion risk does not address the problem. The problem is the slip resistance of the floors. Go and walk around Bunnings on a Saturday and see if you can find any other potential risk factors, over and above the onions. What might you find? Bits of sausage itself? Splotches of tomato sauce, mustard or other condiments? Splashes of meat pie filling or bits of crust? God only knows what, being thrown out of prams and strollers by recalcitrant toddlers who do not really want to be at Bunnings – apple slices, rusks, juice, bits of toast – the list goes on.

Perhaps there is some commercially available product that could be pained on floors to improve their slip resistance. I wonder where you might find something like that … Oh, wait …

I am not critical of Bunning for being concerned about customers falling over in their stores. I understand that. It is a real problem. But I cannot help but feel that if safety really was their number one priority, the response might have been different.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Risk Aversion Tagged With: bunnings, onions, paper safe, paradox, safety no1 priority

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Luciana Muratori says

    November 25, 2018 at 11:42 PM

    This is one of the most over the top safety measures I have ever heard of. I am not Australian and hardly ever will eat a sausage, but I have several Australian friends who do and they are just outraged. Most say that the onions must be placed on top because otherwise the bread will go soggy and spoil the experience.
    I personally think the business of onions being on top or on the bottom should be between the person making the hot dog and the one buying it. Safety managers should keep their noses out of it. C’mon, a bit of common sense goes a long way…

    Reply
  2. Rob Long says

    November 21, 2018 at 7:35 PM

    Great to see ‘Mad as Hell’ take the living piss out of Bunnings and hyper safety.

    Reply
    • Dave Collins says

      November 21, 2018 at 7:42 PM

      Social media is crucifying them!!

      Reply
    • Dave Collins says

      November 21, 2018 at 8:17 PM

      Ode to a Bunning’s onion

      I am a Bunning’s onion
      My life was once quite grand,
      I’d get to look at everything
      As you held me in your hand.

      Looking out the drivers window
      Or at the people you would greet,
      All these scenes unfolded
      Up upon my sausage seat.

      Sometimes I would be blinded
      Smothered by that sauce so red,
      Or a squeeze of yellow mustard
      Soaked up by the fresh white bread.

      But now my life’s just not as good
      As it used to be,
      For my view is now constricted
      By the snag on top of me.

      And why you ask have things so changed,
      Why did my status drop?
      It’s all because some Gympie bloke
      Trod on me and went flop!

      So I’ll fade into obscurity
      Underneath some dodgy meat,
      Now that Bunning’s changed the way
      We eat our weekend treat.

      So please do not forget me
      Now I’m down out of the way,
      And now and then lift up that snag
      And smile and say G’day!

      I’ll still be just as tasty
      Cooked so caramel and rich,
      I’m just not as important
      Since becoming Bunning’s B#tch!

      Reply
  3. Rob Long says

    November 19, 2018 at 12:07 PM

    I think that’s because the basis of safety curriculum is not about safety but compliance to a 1930s approach to behaviourism, hardly an education. The wne something like this comes up safety can’t think critically. It wouldn’t matter what was thrown up, the compliance mindset cannot see beyond the checklist.

    Reply
  4. Rob Long says

    November 19, 2018 at 11:47 AM

    One of the fascinating things to watch in this matter is the naive mentalitie of the safety industry to social politics. Of course, since when did safety study politics or ethics?

    Reply
    • Dave Collins says

      November 19, 2018 at 11:51 AM

      Some big lessons here for Safety but I doubt it is listening, let alone learning anything – so much more to this than a few silly onions but they are just so myopic

      Reply
  5. Bernard Corden says

    November 18, 2018 at 8:47 PM

    A quick scroll through the Wesfarmers home page, about us and our people tabs provides sufficient substantive evidence of the organisation’s leadership attributes, which focus on telling, compliance, enforcement, crime and punishment…..A moment is all it takes:

    https://www.wesfarmers.com.au/who-we-are/who-we-are

    Its primary objective is to provide a satisfactory return to its shareholders, which mirrors the Friedman doctrine on corporate social responsibility.

    The organisation also owns the NSCA, Greencap and Blackwoods.

    Diane Smith-Gander, a non-executive director is the current chair of Safe Work Australia and former CEO at Broadspectrum, which managed the Manus regional processing centre…..Zero harm indeed.

    Previous sinecures included an executive role with Westpac that has lost its moral compass, which is quite a significant accomplishment because it never had one.

    Safety, especially Safe Work Australia, which develops national policy is morally bereft and philosophically rudderless.

    If you want to change culture cut the head off the snake or change’ em or change ’em.

    Reply
  6. Rob Long says

    November 18, 2018 at 6:32 PM

    The industry is in such disarray, how can it be otherwise when at its the foundation is a lack of vision demonstrated by continually speaking nonsense to people. There is simply no vision for safety demonstrated by any of the peak organisations. Who wants to belong to a peak body when it is anchored in love with zero and now the industry is globally married to this nonsense. When you set the language and curticulum by 1930s principles, no wonder modern society laughs at you.

    Zero is what drives much of the petty pissy propaganda masked as care and the preoccupation with minutia.

    Reply
  7. Ed says

    November 18, 2018 at 6:17 PM

    Yes, certainly a snag, for an already damaged product as some of us acknowledge and referred to by comments here and in Robs article on the same topic. I find it very uncomfortable there has been little other critical comment, other than what we read here, from safety people and particularly from the representative body for people working or with interests in workplace safety. (I suspect critical comment is seen as heresy by that body) I feel uncomfortable and conflicted that I read and enjoyed the ridicule directed towards the safety zealots, opportunists et al. and their directives that infest the safety field, yet read of yet another fatality in the workplace. There seems to be a complete disconnect between the two yet the process and outcome sought is supposed to be the same.
    I strongly believe safety for workers at their level is directionless, etc while the safety field is leaderless and lacking in direction for genuine people wanting to improve the lot workers safety.

    Reply
  8. Dave Collins says

    November 18, 2018 at 3:43 PM

    Recent article in “The Shovel” http://www.theshovel.com.au/2018/11/18/onion-too-dangerous-says-shop-that-has-dedicated-chainsaw-section/

    A warehouse chain that has an entire section devoted to chainsaws, compound mitre saws and jackhammers, has warned its customers about the potential dangers of cooked slices of onion.

    “We wouldn’t want people to slip and roll their ankle,” said a spokesperson from the store that stocks machinery designed to dismantle brick walls.

    Walking through the jigsaw, power drill and nail gun section, the spokesperson said onion became slippery when it fell on a concrete floor. He then recommended a product that could remove the onion grease, as well as one that could remove the concrete floor.

    Onions can now be found underneath sausages. Industrial leaf blowers can be found under angle grinders, next to hedge trimmers.

    Reply

Do you have any thoughts? Please share them below Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,499 other subscribers

RECOMMENDED READING

viral post – iso 45003 and what it cannot do

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

Psychosocial Safety and Mental Health Series

Psychosocial Safety, Following-Leading in Risk

Not Just Another ‘Hazard’

Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?

How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety

ISO 45003 and What it Cannot Do

The KISS of Death in Safety

Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health

The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’

The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health

Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)

More Posts from this Category

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Psychosocial Security, Following-Main in Threat - Personal Safety News on Psychosocial Safety, Following-Leading in Risk
  • Rob Long on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • simon p cassin on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • simon p cassin on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Rob long on How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • Rob Long on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Rob Long on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Matt Thorne on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • simon p cassin on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Hurak Learning on How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • Rob Long on An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Paul Gentles on An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Brent Charlton on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Rob Long on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Brian on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Jaise on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Rob Long on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Linda McKendry on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Rob long on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • Road Safety Slogans 2023
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • Proving Safety
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • NATIONAL SAFETY DAY/WEEK IN INDIA 2023
  • Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • 15 Safety Precautions When Working With Electricity
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Safety Acronyms

Recent Posts

  • Psychosocial Safety, Following-Leading in Risk
  • Free Program on Due Diligence
  • Not Just Another ‘Hazard’
  • Work-Life and Risk, Feminine Perspectives
  • Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • Free Download – Real Risk – New Book by Dr Robert Long
  • Proving Safety
  • ISO 45003 and What it Cannot Do
  • Harming People in the Name of Good
  • An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Risk and Safety Maturity
  • The KISS of Death in Safety
  • SPoR, Metanoia and a Podcast on Change with Nippin Anand
  • Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health
  • The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’
  • SPoR Comes to Vienna June 2023
  • The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • The Visionary Imagination – Louisa Lawson
  • Heaven ‘n Hell and the Safety Religion
  • Confirmity in Conformity
  • Numerology and Psychic Numbing
  • Thinking of Mortality
  • Safety is the Wrong Anchor
  • Foresight Blindness, Hindsight Bias and Risk
  • Getting the Balance Right in Tackling Risk
  • What is SPoR?
  • How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Afraid to Let Go of What Doesn’t Work in Safety
  • When You Don’t Know What to do in Safety, Have Another Blitz!!!
  • Gloves and Glasses Compliance
  • A Case of Desensitisation – What Would You Do?
  • How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • The Mythic Symbology of Safety
  • Dark Waters, The True Story of DuPont and Zero
  • 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Am I stupid? I didn’t think of that…
  • Don’t Look Now Safety, Your Metaphor is Showing
  • Ratio Delusions and Heinrich’s Hoax
  • To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Culture as a Wicked Problem, for Safety
  • Safety Leadership Training
  • Cultural Orientation in Risk
  • The Stanford Experiment and The Social Psychology of Risk
  • Objectivity, Audits and Attribution When Calculating Risk
  • Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?
  • Zero, The Seeking of Infinity
  • Safety Leadership Essentials
  • What Can Indiana Jones Tell Us About Culture

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

Foresight Blindness, Hindsight Bias and Risk

Hind-sight, Risk Savvy and the Unexpected

Culture About Much More Than Structure

200,000 SPoR Book Downloads

Incident Investigations and the Einstellung Effect

There is no way I would do that!

Social Sensemaking – Free eBook

Humanising Leadership in Risk, Shifting the Focus from Objects to Persons

The Social Psychology of Risk Handbook, i-thou

Anxiety and Fear Professionals

Acknowledge Trade-offs to Make Better Inquiries

Managing the Unexpected

It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!

Knowing When to Break the Rules

Adverse Events: Eliminate or Anticipate?

The Challenge of Social Sensemaking in Risk

Questioning Skills and Investigations

Adversarialism and the Politicisation of Safety

My thoughts during a walk in the Forests in Vienna

Visual Learning and Envisioning Risk

Holistic Well Being in Risk Differently

Toward Zero, A Failed Goal

No Evidence for the Religion of Zero

Safety as a Knowledge Culture

There is no Hierarchy of Controls

Face to Face SPoR Workshops 2022

Talking Risk Video–Anti-Fragility

Mental Health, Risk and Safety – Part 2

Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?

Zero Discourse and Perfectionism

Why is fallibility so challenging in the workplace?

Shopping for Safety

In Honour of George Robotham and Geoff McDonald

Safety-1, Safety-2, Safety-3

Are You a Safety Fool?

Social Psychology of Risk – Body of Knowledge

The Paradox of Positivism for Safety

Envisioning Risk in Canada

Mental Health, Risk and Safety

ACTOR + ACTION + TIME = EVENT

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,499 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?


WHAT IS PSYCHOSOCIAL SAFETY