Lead and Lag Indicators Workplace Safety

Near Miss or Near Hit

Near Miss or Near Hit

One of the Great Misnomers of Nomenclature in Safety. A very difficult one for most organisations to get their heads around. Do we report, don’t we report, do we just ignore it? This article is probably the best I have ever seen on the subject and well worth a read.

As the Author says:

“Near miss” is one of the dumbest terms used in safety and in business and the use  of it  should be outlawed and any safety “professional” that uses it needs to have his/her tongue glued to his/her lips.

A  “near miss” is actually a hit………”Oops, oh well we nearly missed you” …it can mean two different things. The  term “near miss” creates a sense of comfort in the fact that nothing is really happening as long as we  keep missing……..”If we missed him, what’s the big deal?”………It’s a psychological thing.

Now  if “near miss” is changed to “near hit” a whole new meaning and emphasis comes out…….”We nearly hit  a guy with a forklift”…….There is no half-­‐way or misunderstanding here……..”WE NEARLY HIT…….!”

Getting  employees to report Near Misses is a challenge. Employees often question the value of reporting what they’ve seen. Indeed, many fear that coming forward with a report will cause trouble and lead to punishment. However, I’ve found an effective technique to overcome reluctance:

Analogize  Near Misses at work to incidents at home. Since many of our employees are parents -­‐ and all of  them were once children ­‐ this casts the subject in a light to which they can more easily relate. Here’s how to use the technique.

Download the full article here: [download id=”103021″]

6 Comments

  1. I disagree, this is another example of lowest common denominator rules. The confusion arises from the fact that people read near as nearly. They are not the same thing.

  2. I really wish someone could find the rest of this article. I save alot off the posts on my computer for later use, but for some reason I can’t find this one. I know Rob or someone at CLLR must have a copy of this somewhere.

    1. well thanks for the challenge! I used the waybackmachine.com to go back to 2013 and found a link to Ruth Jenkins old site “Sina Solutions” where I found a cached page with the article in it. Managed to download it and its now in the article as a download – enjoy!

  3. Where is the rest of this blog post? After “Read the Whole Article Here…..” there is no link to read the rest of the post.

    1. The post is 7 years old so I guess the link is dead – I’ll see if I can find a new link and will update it – thanks for letting us know

Do you have any thoughts? Please share them below