• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • 500 OF THE BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychological Safety
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
    • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
    • What is Psychological Safety?
    • Understanding Psychological Terminology
    • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
    • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
    • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / Human Error / To Err is Human, You Better Believe It

To Err is Human, You Better Believe It

January 13, 2023 by Dr Rob Long 4 Comments

imageI was sent this classic today (https://www.shponline.co.uk/culture-and-behaviours/dominic-cooper-to-err-is-human-or-is-it/ ). I get so much safety nonsense sent to me it is hard to keep up.

When you have no linguistic sense nor understanding of an ethic of personhood, it’s so easy to write gobbledygook.

Of course, the context for the saying ‘to err is human’ comes from Alexander Pope (An Essay on Criticism, Part II , 1711) and a Transdisciplinary understanding of Poetics is essential to get its meaning. The phrase sits in a lengthy poem, I have written about this before (https://safetyrisk.net/to-err-is-human-to-forgive-divine/). When I use to teach Pope in Year 12 English and University, and we always knew that context is critical for understanding. Not so in safety.

Safety is one of those industries (not a profession) that frames the world through its own narrow lens, grabs whatever language it decides to mash and distort, all justified by its own ends – usually, the projection of some engineering or behaviourist worldview. Without a Transdisciplinary approach that takes theology, ethics, Poetics, Semiotics, Learning and Religion seriously, one is unlikely to understand Pope, nor what he meant by his phrase ‘to err is human’.

Similarly, discussion about the nature of being phenomenologically human (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326268113_Phenomenology_A_Philosophy_and_Method_of_Inquiry) cannot be separated from an ethic of personhood or cultural anthropology.

When you frame your view of the world through safety, you usually distort that worldview (https://safetyrisk.net/safety-as-a-worldview/ ).

This is why Safety writes so much about the confusion of culture, that it creates for itself.

Safety as an adjective, conditions all that follows. I don’t live for safety; I live to be and live. The meaning and purpose (semiosis) of living is NOT safety.

So, when we come to this piece from Cooper, there is no surprise about the distortion field applied to human meaning. More behaviourism, more engineering, more safety worldview and even a classic sub-heading ‘beyond human’. Transhumanist language is alive and well in safety.

All this sourced in safety classics such as Reason and Rasmussen, there is no element of anything connected to an ethic of personhood.

If an ethic of personhood interests you then perhaps read:

· Arendt, H., (1958) The Human Condition.

· Bauer, J., and Harteis, C., (2012) Human Fallibility, The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning.

· Benner, D., (2016) Human Being and Becoming, Living the Adventure of Life and Love.

· Fuchs,T., (2018) Ecology of the Brain.

· Harding, S., (2015) Paul’s Eschatological Anthropology: The Dynamics of Human Transformation

· Jewett, R., (1971) Paul’s Anthropological Terms, A Study of Their Use in Conflict Settings.

· Kirkwood, C., (2012) The Persons in Relation Perspective, In Counselling, Psychotherapy and Community Adult Learning.

· Lotman, Y., (1990) Universe of the Mind, A Semiotic Theory of Culture.

· Madsbjerg, C., (2017) Sensemaking, What Makes Human Intelligence Essential in the Age of the Algorithm.

· Martin, J., Sugarman, J., and Hickinbottom, S., (2010) Persons: Understanding Psychological Selfhood and Agency

· Schwarz, H., (2013) The Human Being, A Theological Anthropology. Semler, L., Hodge, B., and Kelly, P., (2012) What is the Human? Australian Voices from the Humanities.

· Splitter, L., (2015) Identity and Personhood, Confusions and Clarifications across Disciplines

And there is so much more. If you want to know about fallibility and error then make sure you don’t read Reason (https://safetyrisk.net/no-good-reason-to-follow-reason/) or anything from Safety.

Poor old safety, never talks about ‘fallibility’ (https://www.humandymensions.com/product/fallibility-risk-living-uncertainty/), only loves talk about ‘error’ and even then, never in the context of an ethic of personhood or human meaning. Then mash together a triarchic semiotic with no understanding of semiotics.

One thing is reliable about safety, when it wants to map an idea, it’s most important to leave out the human.

What Safety constantly dishes up in these magazines is a brain-centric worldview, consumed by behaviourism as if this is somehow related to the nature of what it is to be human.

None of this is helpful, constructive, positive or realistic. An alternative practical, positive and meaningful method is offered by SPoR and its free (https://safetyrisk.net/whats-the-alternative-to-traditional-safety-spor/). SPoR is not just about deconstruction but rather a reconstruction of a new approach that works (https://www.humandymensions.com/product/it-works-a-new-approach-to-risk-and-safety/) as if humans matter.

Unless an ethic of personhood and an understanding of fallibility is foundational for incident investigations, you are likely to already know the outcome and it certainly won’t involve learning. It’s very rare that Safety ‘learns’ from accidents.

If you want to learn about Learning then this may help (https://safetyrisk.net/a-definition-of-learning-a-video/).

If you want to know how to do a good incident investigation then you can study SEEK (https://cllr.com.au/product/seek-the-social-psychology-of-event-investigations-unit-2-elearning/).

There is much that SPoR offers for free as in the current module on culture (already running and oversubscribed).

It’s not too late to sign up for the free module on Ethics.

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • The KISS of Death in Safety - January 31, 2023
  • SPoR, Metanoia and a Podcast on Change with Nippin Anand - January 31, 2023
  • Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health - January 31, 2023
  • The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’ - January 31, 2023
  • SPoR Comes to Vienna June 2023 - January 31, 2023
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Human Error, Robert Long Tagged With: to err is human

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Wynand says

    January 13, 2023 at 4:22 PM

    The concept of “error” and “human error” remains a bit of a mystery to me, especially in the “Safety” context. If error was so bad, why do safety appoint people who did not achieve 100% in all their exams? How can forgetting something really be an “error” in a context where perfection is the ideal? Is forgetting and “taking shortcuts” then the same? Why can an experienced person not take “shortcuts” derived from years of doing the task? Why is a novice and an experienced person required to take all the same steps in doing a task? Why is it unacceptable for someone to forget something while focusing on something else? Why is the way the human brain functions (for example prioritising decisions subconsciously to allow focus on the perceived main decision at hand) unacceptable for “Safety”? I can go on, and I always come back to the point where I realise I just don’t understand enough to answer all these questions. However, when an incident is investigated, there is an answer for each of the questions, usually with blame to follow. Not being perfect is the biggest sin in safety, yet it seems “Safety” itself cannot acknowledge how far it is from perfection.

    Reply
    • Rob long says

      January 14, 2023 at 6:55 AM

      Wynand, this industry is so poorly educated that it rejects any challenge of approach to learning. It simply has no capability to face the questions you pose.
      It demonises critical thinking and any sensemaking that includes the humanising of persons. Indeed, it rarely talks about persons of humans in what it does. And under the delusions of zero etc delights in the brutalism that results.
      It has no idea what to do with falllibility hence this kind of goop Cooper puts out and the industry adores it.
      It reinforces its worldview.
      It’s what Safety wants.
      Fortunately there are some who don’t want this, and it is for those that SPoR offers hope.

      Reply
  2. simon cassin says

    January 13, 2023 at 9:56 AM

    Hi Rob,

    A few years ago I spent a year or so, studying the philosophical understanding and interpretation of practical and theoretical reason. During those studies I was introduced to a concept I had never previously heard about. What I now know as the ‘The great rationality debate’ highlighted fundamental flaws in how the concept of human error is comprehended and discussed. I’ll be honest it was as though a whole new perspective suddenly appeared. I don’t want to sound too dramatic about it but it totally blew me away and instantly undermined the taken for granted perspectives of human error used in the H&S world.

    Unfortunately the dominant and consistently agreed interpretation of human error is a tough nut to crack. I have attempted to discuss the questionable categorisation of human error with many in the safety profession but unfortunately none have ever entered into a conversation about how the notion of error is categorised or quantified. (N.B. A caveat to this statement is that Dom has told me he has responded to my questions but as of yet his responses haven’t been updated on the SHP post).

    Anyway thanks for your thoughts.

    Regards

    Simon

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      January 13, 2023 at 11:13 AM

      Thanks Simon. Yes I find most of what Safety conceptualises simplistic and immature. A very poorly educated mono-disciplinary industry.
      One can’t carry on like Safety does about error in a vacuum as if other disciplines have nothing to say. Indeed, Safety thinks their view is the only valid worldview.
      Talking about fallibility is taboo in this industry in love with zero and dehumanising persons. As for Cooper, no surprises. I have no interest in the narrow Safety worldview.

      Reply

Do you have any thoughts? Please share them below Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,498 other subscribers

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

SAFETY MYTHS SERIES

The Mythic Symbology of Safety

Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics

Safety Mythbusters

Don’t Be Emotional! Another Safety Myth

Tackling the Challenge of Heuristics in Safety

The Myth of Normal

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Brian on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Jaise on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Rob Long on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Linda McKendry on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Rob long on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Matt Thorne on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Anonymous on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Jason on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Rob Long on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Admin on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Rob Long on 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Gustavo Saralegui on 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Rob long on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Wynand on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Rob Long on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • simon cassin on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Rob Long on Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?
  • Matt Thorne on Free Online Workshops
  • Rob long on No Good Reason to Follow Reason
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on No Good Reason to Follow Reason

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • 500 OF THE BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • Road Safety Slogans 2023
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • 15 Safety Precautions When Working With Electricity
  • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS, CHECKISTS, REGISTERS, TEMPLATES and APPS
  • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
  • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
  • NATIONAL SAFETY DAY/WEEK IN INDIA 2023

Recent Posts

  • The KISS of Death in Safety
  • SPoR, Metanoia and a Podcast on Change with Nippin Anand
  • Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health
  • The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’
  • SPoR Comes to Vienna June 2023
  • The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • The Visionary Imagination – Louisa Lawson
  • Heaven ‘n Hell and the Safety Religion
  • Confirmity in Conformity
  • Numerology and Psychic Numbing
  • Thinking of Mortality
  • Safety is the Wrong Anchor
  • Foresight Blindness, Hindsight Bias and Risk
  • Getting the Balance Right in Tackling Risk
  • What is SPoR?
  • How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Afraid to Let Go of What Doesn’t Work in Safety
  • When You Don’t Know What to do in Safety, Have Another Blitz!!!
  • Gloves and Glasses Compliance
  • A Case of Desensitisation – What Would You Do?
  • How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • The Mythic Symbology of Safety
  • Dark Waters, The True Story of DuPont and Zero
  • 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Am I stupid? I didn’t think of that…
  • Don’t Look Now Safety, Your Metaphor is Showing
  • Ratio Delusions and Heinrich’s Hoax
  • To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Culture as a Wicked Problem, for Safety
  • Safety Leadership Training
  • Cultural Orientation in Risk
  • The Stanford Experiment and The Social Psychology of Risk
  • Objectivity, Audits and Attribution When Calculating Risk
  • Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?
  • Zero, The Seeking of Infinity
  • Safety Leadership Essentials
  • What Can Indiana Jones Tell Us About Culture
  • Safety as a Worldview
  • The Loathing of Limits
  • Culture Cannot be Framed Through Safety
  • Free Online Workshops
  • Safety Culture–Hudson’s Model
  • Book Launch – For the Love of Zero – in Portuguese
  • Advancing Backwards in Safety
  • The ‘Noise’ of Safety, Silence and Practicing of Mindfulness
  • All Things Must Pass in Risk
  • I’m just not that into safety anymore
  • Sticks and Stones and the Nonsense of Zero Harm
  • Courting Infallibility in Safety

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

Safety, Ethics, SPoR and How to Foster the Abuse of Power

Consciously Safe, Unconsciously Unsafe or Head in the Sand Safety

Managing the Unexpected

Bridging the Disciplines for Better Outcomes

THE INFLUENCE OF VISUAL STIMULI ON THE UNCONSCIOUS

Study at The Centre for Leadership and Learning in Risk

The Safetyization of Normal Life

Hoodwinked by Heinrich

An Introduction to Semiotics and Risk

The Banned Objects Index – A New Development in Safety Culture

New Video Series on Safety

Learning Wisdom from the Collective Unconscious

Models From Social Sensemaking

What Can Safety Learn From Desire Paths?

Could Understanding Grey Be The Silver Bullet

Understanding Safety as an Archetype

Meeting is NOT About Technique

CLLR Christmas 2016 Newsletter and Competition

SPoR Ontology and Methods – A Video

Accidents Happen Because You Don’t Put Safety First

Surfacing – Making the Unconscious Conscious

I Wasn’t Thinking Mr Spock

No Soft Skills in Safety

Tape Down Those Leads

Intuitional Ways of Knowing in Safety

Sensemaking and ‘Hapori’ – Essential for Tackling Risk in New Zealand

OnLine Learning Modules with CLLR

Something’s gotta give..

A Great Comparison of Risk and Safety Schools of Thought

Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk

Traditional Safety

Checklist Seduction and The Delusion of Data

The Deficit Focus and Safety Balance

Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick

Kinesthetic Safety

‘Man Up’ Safety

What’s the Alternative to Traditional Safety? SPoR.

Thinking About Harm

Impacts of Cognitive Dissonance in the Workplace

Looking for Another Side

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,498 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?