• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychosocial Safety
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety
      • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
      • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
      • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
      • What is Psychosocial Safety
      • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
      • What is Psychological Safety?
      • Understanding Psychological Terminology
      • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
      • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
      • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / CLLR / Implications of Fatigue and Distraction Monitoring Systems

Implications of Fatigue and Distraction Monitoring Systems

April 16, 2019 by Admin 8 Comments

Implications of Fatigue and Distraction Monitoring Systems

Guest Post by Danny Fay

As part of my Unit 6 studies for the Diploma in Social Psychology of Risk, I am undertaking the subject of Holistic Ergonomics.  For my assignment in this unit, I have chosen to evaluate the introduction of Fatigue and Distraction Monitoring systems into mobile equipment by looking at the implications of the system on the human operators.

imageTechnologies for fatigue detection and monitoring have been increasing, and appear to be focused on a reductionist or mechanistic understanding of human beings, where physiological or performance-related indicators, such as eye and head movements are used for predicting and controlling fatigue. This approach reduces the human to an extension of the equipment they are operating and overlooks any opportunity to understanding personhood and the complex; even “Wicked”, problem that is fatigue. If an ideal solution to fatigue management existed, it must be a holistic balance, considering the person as social and fallible, rather than a collection of body movements. Although monitoring technology may have a role in tackling fatigue, It would be helpful to understand and manage the issue from a social-psychological approach before it manifests itself through impaired performance that requires a monitoring system.

Activity measurement has its roots in Frederick Taylor’s Scientific Management Theory or Taylorism. Taylorism’s main objective was the optimisation of efficiency and productivity. Essentially, the human is to be treated as part of the machine, where all movements are analysed, measured and standardised to best practice. There is no understanding of personhood in Fatigue Monitoring systems, we are the sum of the individual movements our body makes and there is to be only one best way of achieving an outcome based on these measured movements. Fallibility is seen as something that needs to be managed, the human is the biggest threat to absolute efficiency. Every blink, face and head movement is captured and analysed against an algorithm that determines efficiency. The human operator is merged with the machine and is monitored in the same way tyre pressure or engine performance is monitored. The desire for ultimate efficiency remains and this desire has unintended effects on personhood and what it means to be human.

Jacques Ellul a French philosopher and sociologist wrote extensively about the desire for ultimate efficiency or “Technique” and how the relationship between technology and man or “the technological system” isolates man from nature, alienates us, and shapes society. Technique and technology are not the same. The role of Technique is to clarify, arrange, rationalise and create ultimate efficiency. Technology, then, is but an expression and by-product of the underlying reliance on Technique, whereby everything is organised and managed to function most efficiently, and directed toward the most expedient end of the highest productivity. Ellul’s issue was not specifically with technological machines but with a society necessarily caught up in efficient methodological Techniques. Ellul argues that a certain level of autonomy is essential for an ethical employment relationship, where a respect for autonomy implies recognition of employees as people, rather than simply productivity inputs. Technique denies autonomy in humans, as we become subservient to the quest for ultimate efficiency. One of the by-products of a loss of autonomy is the alienation of humans.

Karl Marx’s theory of Alienation has a view that individuals lose the ability to determine their own life and destiny. They are alienated from their true inner self, desires, and the pursuit of happiness by the demands placed on them by the socio-economic structure and by their conversion into an object by the capitalist mode of production, which views and treats them, not as human subjects, but as replaceable elements of a system of production. In applying the theory of alienation, it could be suggested that the use of a technological system takes what Karl Marx called “the commodity of human labour to an extreme”. Without understanding the context by which the system is being introduced, the monitoring of people in the workplace could be viewed as treating humans as machines where performance is being maximised and the by-product is dehumanising the person.

The myth from the implementation of these technologies is that fatigue is solved and incidents are prevented, but the discourse is dehumanising, humans cannot be understood or treated as objects or machines with the trajectory of alienation, cynicism and mistrust. When fatigue is viewed as an objective and purely scientific phenomenon and humans are reduced to body movements and data points, we are trading off our personhood and perceiving the fallible human as the problem, generating a trajectory of punishment. Paradoxically, the by products of a methodology that views humans as the problem can result in increased anxiety and stress, and a decrease in motivation and job satisfaction, potentially increasing the risk of fatigue.

When tackling the issue of fatigue, technology has a part to play. Given the complexity of the by-products of using Fatigue and Distraction Monitoring systems, it is critical that such monitoring is guided by ethical principles to consider the negative social consequences and the limitations of using this kind of technology. A holistic approach goes beyond the reductionist and Taylorist view that efficiency is king and fatigue is an individual’s problem, and would apply social-psychological methodology to the issue; giving a richer and more balanced understanding to the problem of fatigue. A holistic solution would integrate numerous elements and address different facets of the issue beyond the view that fatigue is just an individual’s problem, such as looking at patterns of work, rosters, rest breaks, monotony of work, hydration, education, a just culture and ability to self-report or raise concerns without fear of standing out. Maybe fatigue will start to make sense if we consider a holistic understanding of personhood, decision-making and risk.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: CLLR, Road Safety Tagged With: Distraction, fatigue, holistic ergonomics

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. bernardcorden says

    April 20, 2019 at 3:18 PM

    The lumpenproletariat are glued to smartphones as they negotiate traffic but try calling a number and it invariably diverts to a message bank.

    Reply
  2. Rob Long says

    April 19, 2019 at 7:58 AM

    Narelle, Safety has a long way to go before it even gets close to an holistic mindset. Just loook and listen to the lack of vision and insight at safety conferences and you might wonder why anyone goes. All cognitvist and behaviourist stuff from the dark ages.

    Reply
  3. Narelle Stoll says

    April 18, 2019 at 12:08 PM

    Good article Danny and really highlights why a holistic approach is needed. Particularly how work is arranged and structured to minimize fatigue. Such as allowing for changes in work routine, regular breaks, opportunity for proper rehydration and proper management of health and psychological factors that may contribute to fatigue such as illness, personal stress etc. Which is not solved or addressed in taking a mechanistic approach. .I currently work in the Home and Disability Sector where fatigue is an issue given the nature of work isolation, exposure to occupational violence and the repetitive nature of the work undertaken. Unfortunately very little work has been done in this space in terms of identifying ideal work conditions and structure. it seems that the common approach sadly is to apply technology, which in my view may track fatigue but does very little to prevent it.

    Reply
  4. bernardcorden says

    April 18, 2019 at 9:50 AM

    Often disguised as human factors but scratch the scab and the black box psychology with its festering pus of behaviour based safety and pejorative militaristic descriptors such as line of fire, eyes on path, eyes on task, situational awareness comes oozing out as it blames the victim on the carousel of culpability.

    It was promoted in the oil and gas sector via the Keil Centre and has infiltrated IOSH via Loughborough University as Occidental Petroleum and BP protect their corporate image following the Piper Alpha and Deepwater Horizon disasters.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      April 19, 2019 at 8:02 AM

      Bernard, there’s plenty of branding that masks behaviourism in the sector. Scratch the surface and you’ll find the old culprits of individualist blame and political ignorance. Indeed, any recognition of political/ethical forces at work in safety that legitimizes the ‘Freedom to Harm’ is quickly criticised as being critical of safety people. The personalisation of the occupation of safety is part of the strategy of invoking neutral innocence and therefore in action ethically and politically.

      Reply
  5. Rob long says

    April 18, 2019 at 6:20 AM

    Suzanne, the current approach to ergonomics is mechanistic and reductionist. Humans are understood as objects in a system. What is missing is all we know about humans as embodied and social beings. A long way to go before this industry has any sense of holism in practice.

    Reply
  6. Suzanne Jackson says

    April 18, 2019 at 3:10 AM

    I love this article. As an Ergonomist I can tell you that the focus is on how technology can improve people. Aside from helping those with disabilities and disease, when it is applied in the workplace in a Tayloristic fashion it is dehumanizing. But our Forest industry revels in it. Of course to work in Forestry you have to work 12 hour shifts of monotonous work that starts at 4 am. But we don’t talk about that. I am working right now to prevent telemetry systems from being installed in a small local government fleet. Yet my opponents are preachers of efficiency and claiming it will help employees.

    Reply
  7. Rob Long says

    April 16, 2019 at 7:57 PM

    A good piece Danny, presenting the problems with technique and dehumanising people through naive goals and motives but with destructive outcomes. The reductionist, cognitvist and behaviourist ideologies that dominate safety lead to this destructive mechanistic approach and humans become collateral damage.

    Reply

Do you have any thoughts? Please share them below Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,499 other subscribers

RECOMMENDED READING

viral post – iso 45003 and what it cannot do

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

Psychosocial Safety and Mental Health Series

Not Just Another ‘Hazard’

Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?

How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety

ISO 45003 and What it Cannot Do

The KISS of Death in Safety

Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health

The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’

The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health

Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)

No Good Reason to Follow Reason

More Posts from this Category

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Matt Thorne on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • simon p cassin on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Hurak Learning on How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • Rob Long on An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Paul Gentles on An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Brent Charlton on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Rob Long on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Brian on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Jaise on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Rob Long on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Linda McKendry on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Rob long on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Matt Thorne on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Anonymous on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Jason on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Rob Long on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Admin on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Rob Long on 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Gustavo Saralegui on 400,000 Free Downloads

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • Proving Safety
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • Road Safety Slogans 2023
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • ISO 45003 and What it Cannot Do
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • NATIONAL SAFETY DAY/WEEK IN INDIA 2023
  • 15 Safety Precautions When Working With Electricity
  • How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety

Recent Posts

  • Not Just Another ‘Hazard’
  • Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • Free Download – Real Risk – New Book by Dr Robert Long
  • Proving Safety
  • ISO 45003 and What it Cannot Do
  • Harming People in the Name of Good
  • An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Risk and Safety Maturity
  • The KISS of Death in Safety
  • SPoR, Metanoia and a Podcast on Change with Nippin Anand
  • Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health
  • The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’
  • SPoR Comes to Vienna June 2023
  • The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • The Visionary Imagination – Louisa Lawson
  • Heaven ‘n Hell and the Safety Religion
  • Confirmity in Conformity
  • Numerology and Psychic Numbing
  • Thinking of Mortality
  • Safety is the Wrong Anchor
  • Foresight Blindness, Hindsight Bias and Risk
  • Getting the Balance Right in Tackling Risk
  • What is SPoR?
  • How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Afraid to Let Go of What Doesn’t Work in Safety
  • When You Don’t Know What to do in Safety, Have Another Blitz!!!
  • Gloves and Glasses Compliance
  • A Case of Desensitisation – What Would You Do?
  • How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • The Mythic Symbology of Safety
  • Dark Waters, The True Story of DuPont and Zero
  • 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Am I stupid? I didn’t think of that…
  • Don’t Look Now Safety, Your Metaphor is Showing
  • Ratio Delusions and Heinrich’s Hoax
  • To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Culture as a Wicked Problem, for Safety
  • Safety Leadership Training
  • Cultural Orientation in Risk
  • The Stanford Experiment and The Social Psychology of Risk
  • Objectivity, Audits and Attribution When Calculating Risk
  • Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?
  • Zero, The Seeking of Infinity
  • Safety Leadership Essentials
  • What Can Indiana Jones Tell Us About Culture
  • Safety as a Worldview
  • The Loathing of Limits
  • Culture Cannot be Framed Through Safety

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

An Introduction to Semiotics and Risk

Why is Myth so Scary to Safety?

Reality vs Theory, The Binary Divide

The Attraction of Simple and Easy in Safety

Safety as Policing

Understanding Goal States, Motivation and SPoR, A Video

Subliminal and Subconscious Influence

The Myth of Fast and Slow Thinking

Dumbs for Safety

Anchoring, Framing and Priming Risk

Sergeant Safety

Understanding Psychological Terminology

ACTOR + ACTION + TIME = EVENT

Flooding is Dangerous, and I don’t Mean the Water….

King of the World – Why is Sociopathy and Psychopathy so prevalent ‘at the top’?

The Illusion Of Hazard Identification

Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety

Who Gives a Toss?

Free Poster–Risk

Rhetoric and Reality in Safety

What Are Observation-Conversation Skills?

Clarity Enabled

The Problem with Zero Harm

Why we make mistakes

Safety and Non-Neuroscience

A Question of Ethics

Humanising Safety Free Virtual Conference

Workshop – Introduction to the Social Psychology of Risk

A must watch risk and safety video

When Slogans Don’t Work

Consciously Safe, Unconsciously Unsafe or Head in the Sand Safety

What is Critical Listening when Dealing with Risk?

The Dynamics of Dehumanisation

The Safety Control Delusion

A Semiotic Map for Safety

‘False Consciousness’ and Perception in Risk and Safety

Third Group Commences the Graduate Program in The Psychology of Risk

Fear of Being-in-the-World

Are You a Safety Fool?

Courage to Challenge the Great TRIFR and LTIFR Delusion

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,499 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?


WHAT IS PSYCHOSOCIAL SAFETY