• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Safety Risk .net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE RESOURCES
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • PSYCHOLOGY OF SAFETY & RISK
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Covid-19
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Covid-19 Returning to Work Inductions, Transitioning, Safety Start Up and Re Entry Plans
    • Covid-19 Work from Home Safety Checklists and Risk Assessments
    • The Hierarchy of Control and Covid-19
    • Why Safety Loves Covid-19
    • Covid-19, Cricket and Lessons in Safety
    • The Covid-19 Lesson
    • Safety has this Covid-19 thing sorted
    • The Heart of Wisdom at Covid Time
    • How’s the Hot Desking Going Covid?
    • The Semiotics of COVID-19 and the Social Amplification of Risk
    • Working From Home Health and Safety Tips – Covid-19
    • Covid-19 and the Hierarchy of Control
  • Dr Rob Long Posts
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no HIERARCHY of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • Quotes & Slogans
    • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
    • When Slogans Don’t Work
    • 77 OF THE MOST CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
    • 500 BEST and WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2021
    • 167 CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Safety Acronyms
    • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
    • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
    • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
    • Safety Slogans List
    • Road Safety Slogans
    • How to write your own safety slogans
    • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
    • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
    • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
    • Safety Slogans for Work
You are here: Home / Robert Long / The Scars and Harm You Don’t See and Can’t Count

The Scars and Harm You Don’t See and Can’t Count

January 30, 2021 by Dr Rob Long 6 Comments

The Scars and Harm You Don’t See and Can’t Count

Healing BrainYou don’t know what safety is. I know what real safety is, 1km underground in a grubby longwall, now that’s safety. Yep, 200 metres up on the end of a harness, now that’s safety. You don’t know what safety is, sitting for 3 days behind a desk filing checklists and preparing injury reports, at the end of a coal loader or on an oil rig, you don’t know what safety is. Ah, you don’t know what safety is, doing an incident investigation on a fatality or working a warehouse the size of the MCG.

Like a skit from the Four Yorkshiremen (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKHFZBUTA4k) this is the kind of infantile rubbish I get sent at times from safety people who want to display their intelligence about being the ‘safety tough guy’, ‘crusader’ and ‘safety hero’ and it’s always about the prevention of physical harm. It’s always about being tough and always about discrediting psychology or forms of knowledge deemed ‘academic’.

I remember running a training session for contract drillers once a kilometre underground and a safety advisor walked in and stated ‘I don’t need any of this pu#*y Sh$t!’, ‘I’ve got to be back out there where the real work is!’ I usually ignore macho bravado noise that often comes out from Safety when a 35 year old tries to tell me I haven’t lived, and don’t know safety. Usually by the end of the day you find out that all the bravado and noise is a smoke screen for deep psychosis and dysfunctionality. You learn quickly that workers on site have no time for the said safety advisor indeed, their safety bravado is laughed at.

The physical side of safety is straight forward when it comes to tackling risk. The tough stuff is the harm and damage you can’t see and it takes much skill to surface it and know how to respond to it. Most often safety crusaders (https://safetyrisk.net/safety-crusaders-anonymous/ ), who make the most noise, have the greatest collection of hang-ups. If you need to compete with others about the toughest or most brutal heroics in safety watch out, your psychosis is showing.

I have written before on the unseen scars and unseen harm in the risk and safety industry. It’s an area of harm the industry is simply incompetent and knows so little about (https://safetyrisk.net/scars-and-wounds-on-the-inside/). Whilst Safety is busy counting cuts and sprained ankles, the most destructive harm is unseen. If you ever listen to someone who has been destroyed by grooming and gaslighting (https://safetyrisk.net/personhood-and-risk/) for 10-20 years, then you might experience harm that is immeasurable. Whilst bones and skin can heal and leave scars that can be counted, the scars of psychological harm are much worse and can’t be counted.

When Grace Tame got up to receive her Australian of the Year award (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-25/2021-australian-of-the-year-award-recipients-named/13089884), you felt the years of harm and pain in her voice, the anger of having her personhood robbed by a 58 year old teacher who she trusted. Until such harm comes to the surface, you can’t see it. Often it’s only when someone suicides that their story of harm and abuse comes to the surface. And people with such harm would never speak to a safety hero or crusader, because they know they don’t listen.

Of course, at the heart of the problem is zero, the safety global mantra . When you define safety by the counting of observable injury then the real injury, the long lasting injury, suffering, pain and harm that remains unseen, fades into the background. This is the real harmful by-product of the zero cult. The more Safety promotes this bravado rubbish, the counting of numbers and objects, the more the most significant harm remains hidden.

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • Culture Silences in Safety – Linguistics - May 26, 2022
  • Culture Silences in Safety – Embodiment - May 26, 2022
  • Culture Silences in Safety – Holism - May 23, 2022
  • Culture Silences in Safety The Collective Unconscious - May 21, 2022
  • Culture Silences in Safety Artefacts - May 20, 2022
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Robert Long, Zero Harm Tagged With: safety crusaders, scars

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Rob Long says

    February 1, 2021 at 6:02 PM

    Closer to home, the Dreamworld fiasco and the way families were treated is horrendous.
    The first response of Safety is always denial.
    When the global mantra/ideology of zero commands all of safety including associations and regulators there is little chance of anything other than brutalism.
    If you want to see the worst culture for blame and victimization go no further than safety.
    Just ask anyone who has gone on long time worker’s comp just how good is safety?

    Reply
  2. Bernard Corden says

    January 31, 2021 at 4:24 PM

    The following link provides access to a public hearing transcript on 15/03/2017 during the Queensland parliamentary inquiry into black lung:

    https://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/documents/committees/CWPSC/2016/CWPSC/CWP-trnsp-15Mar2017.pdf

    Testimonies from several victims on pages 43-49 and 56-59 offer ample evidence of the scars you don’t see and cannot count.

    Indeed most public inquiries or royal commissions merely establish the magnitude of the problem and enable the incumbent government irrespective of its political persuasion to protect the interests of the powerful over the powerless, which typically involves socialising the loss.

    Several other examples over many decades include:

    a) Aberfan
    b) Piper Alpha
    c) Hillsborough
    d) Grenfell Tower
    e) Upper Big Branch
    f) Deepwater Horizon

    There are many more detailed in my treatise entitled How Grim Was My Valley – The Great Safety Charade, which is available as a free download via:

    https://www.humandymensions.com/product/the-great-safety-charade/

    No one is free, even the birds are chained to the sky – Bob Dylan

    Reply
  3. Rob Long says

    January 31, 2021 at 11:07 AM

    Rob nails it except for one thing. Safety is not a profession. It has light years to go before it could ever claim the label with any meaning.

    Reply
  4. Rob Long says

    January 31, 2021 at 6:50 AM

    Bob, you make some great points about organisational dynamics and systemic problems with how many companies and CEOs ‘use’ safety as a weapon or to gaslight populations of people. and yes, you could do similar profiles of law, economics, politics and discuss them as archetypes. Except to say, none of these associations globally organise around the ideology of zero. Yes, professions can be brutal too but then again they tend to be less fraudulent about what they do. IT seems crazy to claim you want to keep people safe and then harm them in the process. BTW, I get plenty of mail from supposed safety people who tell me I know nothing about safety and that psychology is ‘pu$#y s*^t’.
    You also raise the important point about regulators and it seems their disdain for the great unwashed is a huge issue. If your foundation is zero, counting and engineering, its no surprise that brutalism results. The associations their love of zero is also a huge driver of this despite the fact that individual safety people in organisations mean well and work hard. However, the evidence is quite clear from the AIHS BoK and safety curriculum, there is no focus at all on personhood or an ethic of safety anywhere globally. Very different in the real professions.
    Thanks for your comprehensive response.

    Reply
  5. Bob says

    January 30, 2021 at 4:53 PM

    Anecdotal claims about the burly, monomaniacal, resistant, non-receptive ‘safety tough-guy’ walking out in a huff, while mild-mannered, humble, receptive, salt-of-the-earth workers eagerly await with baited breath to receive wisdom, seems a little far fetched to me. I have numerous anecdotes which could demonstrate the opposite. I’ve also had the pleasure of witnessing highly functional teams, where everybody shoulders a proportionate burden, and doesn’t expect others to rush in and fill vacuums of their own making.

    If it is in fact true, then it’s likely a result of a highly dysfunctional operations management placing an undue burden of responsibility of ‘looking after the guys’ on the safety guy, while simultaneously setting expectations to ‘just get it done’ to line-supervision, and the workforce. This can only lead to utter dysfunction.

    Who’s to say the safety guy hasn’t also been gaslighted, and his resistance is a result of him being told he has to simultaneously be ‘at the coalface’ peering over the guys’ shoulders, shoe-horned into a non-existent gap between supervisor and worker, while also getting all of his (largely unnecessary) paperwork done (paperwork imposed by management, client, or regulator) resulting in management-induced stress, confusion and disarray? Yes, workers and supervisors and management have paperwork too, much of probably also unnecessary.

    The ‘safety guy’ may well be feeling that if he stands up to management and tells them that they should simply expect, and allow, the supervisors to supervise their guys in all aspects of their duties, and provide them with the guidance, support, and resources to do so, while he (the safety guy) assumes a more supportive, sideline, background (but still important in its own way) role, then he will be simply replaced by management, with someone who is willing to unquestioningly do their bidding, and be the nippy ‘safety guard dog’ which many in management seem to think gets the results they need.

    I often see articles and comments here implying that this nebulous entity called ‘Safety’ has some kind of Rasputin-like mind control over company leadership, and that they are the real cause of many organizational woes, and that if we were to pull back the curtain, it appears to be that ‘safety’ is the one truly pulling all the strings and levers.

    There never seems to be any kind of derisive criticism of other entities such as ‘law’ or ‘management’, who have demonstrably more influence over the goings-on (both good and bad) than mere ‘safety minions’. Yes, I’m aware that the focus of this website is safety, but if we want to actually improve what’s going wrong, there needs to be an acknowledgement that in the vast majority of cases involving dysfunction in the workplace, it’s management who are ultimately responsible and accountable, and it’s management and supervision who have fallen asleep at the wheel, or taken their eyes off the ball, and sometimes even deferred at least a part of their responsibility to someone who should not have it (the safety guy). It’s a case of ‘speak to the organ-grinder, not the monkey’. Yes, it’s an old saying, and it’s not intended to de-humanize, or un-person anybody.

    Of course, there’s safety regulators, with no fear of, nor respect for company management, who can often arrive on site with diva-like behaviour, dangerously combined with absolute ignorance of the operation at hand, nit-picking minor, unrelated ‘non-compliances’, focusing only on things they know, and not on things which actually matter, and which could improve the safety of operations. Sure, these guys can be part of the problem, but that’s a ‘Law’ problem, not a ‘Safety’ problem.

    Ultimately, the vast majority of ‘safety guys’ are in-house employees, and are working in dysfunctional organizations, getting it from both sides, having their goalposts often shifted outside the stadium, saddled with undue responsibility, yet they seem to be the focus of all the derision and criticism here.

    Reply
    • Admin says

      January 30, 2021 at 6:01 PM

      You make some great points. The Author often writes about these competing goals and the safety person needing to be a little subversive or “bipolar” in order to survive. You might enjoy this one: https://safetyrisk.net/safety-professionalspiggy-in-the-middle/

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Visit Count – Started Jan 2015

  • 24,030,073 Visitors

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,427 other subscribers

NEW! Free Download

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Matt Thorne on SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF RISK – INTRODUCTION WORKSHOP
  • Matt Thorne on SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF RISK – INTRODUCTION WORKSHOP
  • Rob Long on Culture Silences in Safety – Embodiment
  • Rob Long on SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF RISK – INTRODUCTION WORKSHOP
  • Brian Darlington on SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF RISK – INTRODUCTION WORKSHOP
  • Wynand on Culture Silences in Safety – Embodiment
  • Lynn Getzinger on Free Online Safety Training Courses
  • Rob Long on How to Give an Unforgettable Safety Presentation
  • Ndilimeke Shiwayu on How to Give an Unforgettable Safety Presentation
  • Mark Wayne Arboso on 500 BEST and WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2021

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Recent Posts

  • SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF RISK – INTRODUCTION WORKSHOP
  • Culture Silences in Safety – Linguistics
  • Culture Silences in Safety – Embodiment
  • Culture Silences in Safety – Holism
  • Culture Silences in Safety The Collective Unconscious
  • Culture Silences in Safety Artefacts
  • Culture Silences in Safety Symbolism
  • Culture Silences in Safety Mythology
  • The Safety Trifecta and Nothing Changes
  • Sleep Dysfunction, Dreaming and Safety

What is Psychological Safety at Work?

Footer

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,427 other subscribers

AUTHORS

  • Alan Quilley
    • Heinrich–Industrial Accident Prevention
    • The Problem With ZERO Goals and Results
  • Bernard Corden
    • After the goldrush
    • The Internationale
  • Bill Sims
    • Employee Engagement: Chocolate, Vanilla, or Strawberry?
    • Injury Hiding-How do you stop it?
  • Craig Clancy
    • Task Based vs Activity Based Safe Work Method Statements
    • Safety And Tender Submissions
  • Daniel Kirk
    • It’s easy being wise after the event.
    • A Positive Safety Story
  • Dave Whitefield
    • Safety is about…
    • Safety and Compliance
  • Dennis Millard
    • Are You Risk Intelligent?
    • Honey they get me! They get me at work!
  • Drewie
    • Downturn Doin’ Your Head In? Let’s Chat….
    • How was your break?
  • Gabrielle Carlton
    • All Care and No Care!
    • You Are Not Alone!
  • George Robotham
    • How to Give an Unforgettable Safety Presentation
    • How To Write a Safety Report
  • Goran Prvulovic
    • Safety Manager – an Ultimate Scapegoat
    • HSE Performance – Back to Basics
  • James Ellis
    • Psychological Core Stability for Wellbeing in Workers Comp
    • In search of plan B in workers’ recovery
  • James Parkinson
    • To laugh or not to laugh
    • People and Safety
  • John Toomey
    • In it for The Long Haul – Making the most of the FIFO Lifestyle
    • Who is Responsible for This?
  • Karl Cameron
    • Abby Normal Safety
    • The Right Thing
  • Ken Roberts
    • Safety Legislation Is Our Biggest Accident?
    • HSE Trip Down Memory Lane
  • Mark Perrett
    • Psychology of Persuasion: Top 5 influencing skills for getting what you want
  • Mark Taylor
    • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
    • Enculturing Safety
  • Max Geyer
    • WHS Legislation is NOT about Safety it’s about Culture
    • Due Diligence Is Not Just Ticking Boxes!
  • Matt Thorne
    • Safety Culture–Hudson’s Model
    • Culture – Edgar Schein
  • Peter Ribbe
    • Is there “Common Sense” in safety?
    • Who wants to be a safety professional?
  • Phil LaDuke
    • Professional Conferences Are A Sleazy Con
    • Hey Idiots, You’re Worried About the Wrong Things
  • Admin
    • SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF RISK – INTRODUCTION WORKSHOP
    • Study Reveals an Unexpected Side Effect of Traffic Safety Messages
  • Dr Rob Long
    • Culture Silences in Safety – Linguistics
    • Culture Silences in Safety – Embodiment
  • Rob Sams
    • The Learning (and unlearning) that Revealed my Vocation
    • I’m just not that into safety anymore
  • Barry Spud
    • Things To Consider When Developing And Designing Your Company SWMS
    • Bad Safety Photos
  • Sheri Suckling
    • How Can I Get the Boss to Listen?
  • Simon Cassin
    • Safety values, ideas, behaviours and clothes
  • Safety Nerd
    • The Block isn’t portraying safety as it should be
    • Toolbox Talk Show–PPE
  • Wynand Serfontein
    • Why The Problem With Learning Is Unlearning
    • I DON’T KNOW
  • Zoe Koskinas
    • Why is fallibility so challenging in the workplace?

Most commented on

The Unconscious and the Soap Dispenser

Forecasting Safety

The Banned Objects Index – A New Development in Safety Culture

Dumbs for Safety

The Real Barriers to Safety

Safety as Faith Healing

Who Said We Don’t Need Systems?

How to use signs, symbols and text effectively in communicating about risk

Why Safety Controls Don’t Always Work

Safety Should NOT Be About Safety

FEATURED POSTS

Managing the Unexpected

Numerology and Psychic Numbing

The Social Psychology of Risk Event Exploration (Investigation) Knowledge

Foundations of Perception and Imagination in Risk

People Skills Are Not Soft Skills

The Art of the Open Question

Human Factors is Never About Humans

Risk and Safety Matrices and the Psychology of Colour

It Takes Two to Tango–Reflections on Safe Behaviour

Perfectionism in Safety and the Denial of Humanity

Abduction in Risk and Safety

Safety Doesn’t Need Military Language

The Safety Worldview and the Worldview of Safety, Testing Due Diligence

Zero Discourse as Gobbledygook

Is there “Common Sense” in safety?

THE INFLUENCE OF VISUAL STIMULI ON THE UNCONSCIOUS

The Sickness of Safetyism

Toward Zero, A Failed Goal

I Wasn’t Thinking Mr Spock

The Mythic Symbology of Safety

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,427 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

 

How To Make Your Own Hand Sanitizer

 

 

How to Make your own Covid-19 Face Mask

 

Covid-19 Returning To Work Safety, Transitioning, Start Up And Re Entry Plans

 

How’s the Hot Desking Going Covid?

imageOne of the benefits of the Covid-19 epidemic is a total rethink about how we live and work (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-28/coronavirus-could-reshape-how-australians-work-forever/12097124 ).

Expertise by Regurgitation and Re-Badging

One of the fascinating things about the Coronavirus pandemic is watching Safety morph into epidemiology expertise. I would like a dollar for every flyer, presentation, podcast, powerpoint, checklist template, toolbox talk and poster set that had jumped into my inbox… Read the rest

The Stress of Stasis

One of the challenging things about the Coronavirus crisis is stasis. For those without work and confined to home, for those in self-isolation, it’s like life is frozen in time. ‘Stay at home’ is the mantra. The trouble is, in… Read the rest

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.