• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • 500 OF THE BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychological Safety
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
    • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
    • What is Psychological Safety?
    • Understanding Psychological Terminology
    • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
    • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
    • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / Robert Long / SPoR, Ideology and Safety Myth

SPoR, Ideology and Safety Myth

September 7, 2022 by Dr Rob Long 6 Comments

Continuing our series on Safety Myths – see them all here

safety mythIdeology is one of those tricky words that can be defined 100 ways. So, it’s always good to define meaning before assuming others know the application of language. In language context, philosophy and culture are critical determinant of meaning and on most occasions dictionary definitions are unhelpful. When I was doing my PhD, it took me 3 months to find an adequate definition for ideology. For my thesis I used the following definition from Talcott Parsons:

‘An ideology is to be understood as that synthesis of beliefs within a culture which (not withstanding its degree of inner consistency, its degree of command of social allegiance, the degree of sophisticated social understanding of its social ramifications, nor its rational adequacy as an interpretation of reality), defines answers for a society to problems of the meaning of reality, and tends to commit such society to action consonant with these.’

Such a definition is critical to distinguish from Marxist, Postmodernist and political definition. In most cases ideology is understood as a political systemising of ideas.

So, in SPoR an ideology describes a synthesis of beliefs ‘within a culture’.

Ideology and philosophy share much in common and are largely ignored by the risk and safety industry. For example, the issue of ideology receives no mention in any safety book I know or the . Indeed, I read a so called ‘safety culture’ book recently that stated that the best thing to do with culture was not to discuss it and proposed that the best solution to the challenges of culture was to do more of the same, quoting Hopkins. So when culture is put in the ‘too hard’ basket, no wonder there is no discussion in safety on ideology.

Safety books like this and similar, demonstrate clearly just how bankrupt Safety is when it comes to tackling complex and wicked problems (https://safetyrisk.net/risk-and-safety-as-a-wicked-problem/) from a narrow mono-disciplinary mindset. A great example of ‘head in the sand safety’. If you want to know about culture in safety apparently you ask a mechanical engineer. It is amusing to watch Safety write papers and books on whatever topic, always anchored to authors in safety. Framing research in this way is foundational to the problem of safety ideology and safety myth.

In the face of wicked problems like culture and risk, a Transdisciplinary approach is best positioned to move forward and offer a professional/mature approach.

The acceptance of ideology is like the acceptance myth, both are a shibboleth of demarcation in an industry that worships ‘head in the sand safety’.

An ideology is the foundation of a myth and when endorsed by a semiotic blends to become a self-fulfilling proposition. No evidence is required, bow-tie works! (https://safetyrisk.net/the-bogus-bow-tie-myth/ )

In this way Safety asserts that a model is a method, when it is not. In this way a graphic is presented as a symbolic reality (myth) when all meaning is attributed from a hidden ideology. Then without any skills in Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) or Critical Thinking Safety is unable to backtrack to assumptions to discover the driving ideology.

This is how the myth of objectivity in safety is maintained.

In SPoR, CDA and Critical Thinking are foundational to tackling risk.

When ideologies are invested with political power, people can be swept aside and dehumanized because they are perceived as a threat to that society (and its myths). This is the nature of xenophobia. This is the ideology of zero. This is the myth of the absolute and perfectionism.

When ideology/myth and symbol are political tools, demonization and brutalism of others is easy, fuelled by binary opposition.

Ideologies throughout history have been used to justify all forms of dehumanising practice, even sacking someone for debating that idea. This is how one gets excommunicated from a religious organisation, such is the fundamentalism of safety/zero.

Of course, Safety never owns its ideology or myths nor discusses its foundational beliefs, worldviews or philosophy. Any discussion of philosophy in Safety is usually deemed ‘academic’ and irrelevant.

This approach enables an insidious ideology to run underground in safety, privileging ignorance as a virtue, enabling brutalism and dehumanising persons in the name of ‘good’.

For example, just explore any of the incident investigation methods on the market and search for a discussion of worldview/philosophy. You won’t find it. The silly assumption from safety engineering is that investigation methods are objective. The reductionism, materialism, positivism and behaviourism are embedded in the method, it’s just that Safety never names or articulates it.

Most of the safety myths discussed so far in this series (https://safetyrisk.net/category/safety-myths/) are driven by these philosophies and ideologies mentioned above.

In SPoR, it is considered foundational to articulate one’s philosophy/worldview. This is not only ethical but maintains transparency in the face of so many silences in safety. And it is from these many silences that Safety then broadcasts the noise of being ‘professional’, when it is not. The AIHS BoK Chapter on Ethics is a classic example of unprofessional discourse, hidden agenda, silences and a lack of transparency, which is unethical.

So, whenever we see a symbol/myth paraded in safety we should ask these questions:

  1. What is the driving ideology and philosophy of the myth/symbol?
  2. What is this symbol designed to do?
  3. Who is the designer? What is the agenda?
  4. Who and what is privileged by this symbol/myth?
  5. What is the ethic of the myth/symbol?
  6. Where is its power?
  7. What are the outcomes of the myth?
  8. What does it do to persons?
  9. How is it used?
  10. What trade-offs and by-products are created by the myth?
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual) - January 23, 2023
  • Foresight Blindness, Hindsight Bias and Risk - January 23, 2023
  • Getting the Balance Right in Tackling Risk - January 23, 2023
  • What is SPoR? - January 23, 2023
  • How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety - January 23, 2023
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Robert Long, Safety Myths, Social Psychology of Risk Tagged With: AIHS BoK, AIHS BoK Chapter on Ethics, ideology, transdisciplinary approach

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Brent Charlton says

    September 9, 2022 at 10:29 AM

    Just find a picture or video on Linked In of someone getting blown up and ask “what’s your goal in posting this video of someone dying?” All you get is “it’s about learning” or, more directly “shut the hell up, you must be terrible at safety”

    Reply
    • Admin says

      September 9, 2022 at 11:56 AM

      yes, I must “want to kill people” apparently……

      Reply
      • Rob Long says

        September 9, 2022 at 3:28 PM

        That’s the kind of dumb assumption I expect from an industry consumed by compliance and dumb down thinking. Was that delivered by a BBS professor by chance?

        Reply
        • BRENT R CHARLTON says

          September 17, 2022 at 2:35 AM

          No, delivered most often by your average day to day “professional.”

          Reply
  2. Matthew Thorne says

    September 7, 2022 at 6:25 PM

    What does it say about safety when so few questions are asked?

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      September 7, 2022 at 6:41 PM

      Matt, the only contact I get usually wants to lecture me about what they know or why I am wrong. It’s amazing what safety engineering knows.

      Reply

Do you have any thoughts? Please share them below Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,496 other subscribers

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

SAFETY MYTHS SERIES

The Mythic Symbology of Safety

Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics

Safety Mythbusters

Don’t Be Emotional! Another Safety Myth

Tackling the Challenge of Heuristics in Safety

The Myth of Normal

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Rob Long on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Linda McKendry on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Rob long on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Matt Thorne on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Anonymous on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Jason on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Rob Long on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Admin on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Rob Long on 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Gustavo Saralegui on 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Rob long on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Wynand on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Rob Long on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • simon cassin on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Rob Long on Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?
  • Matt Thorne on Free Online Workshops
  • Rob long on No Good Reason to Follow Reason
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on No Good Reason to Follow Reason
  • Risk Diversity on Book Launch – For the Love of Zero – in Portuguese
  • Rob Long on No Good Reason to Follow Reason

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • 500 OF THE BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • Road Safety Slogans 2023
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • Safety Acronyms
  • Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
  • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS, CHECKISTS, REGISTERS, TEMPLATES and APPS
  • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails

Recent Posts

  • Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Foresight Blindness, Hindsight Bias and Risk
  • Getting the Balance Right in Tackling Risk
  • What is SPoR?
  • How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Afraid to Let Go of What Doesn’t Work in Safety
  • When You Don’t Know What to do in Safety, Have Another Blitz!!!
  • Gloves and Glasses Compliance
  • A Case of Desensitisation – What Would You Do?
  • How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • The Mythic Symbology of Safety
  • Dark Waters, The True Story of DuPont and Zero
  • 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Am I stupid? I didn’t think of that…
  • Don’t Look Now Safety, Your Metaphor is Showing
  • Ratio Delusions and Heinrich’s Hoax
  • To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Culture as a Wicked Problem, for Safety
  • Safety Leadership Training
  • Cultural Orientation in Risk
  • The Stanford Experiment and The Social Psychology of Risk
  • Objectivity, Audits and Attribution When Calculating Risk
  • Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?
  • Zero, The Seeking of Infinity
  • Safety Leadership Essentials
  • What Can Indiana Jones Tell Us About Culture
  • Safety as a Worldview
  • The Loathing of Limits
  • Culture Cannot be Framed Through Safety
  • Free Online Workshops
  • Safety Culture–Hudson’s Model
  • Book Launch – For the Love of Zero – in Portuguese
  • Advancing Backwards in Safety
  • The ‘Noise’ of Safety, Silence and Practicing of Mindfulness
  • All Things Must Pass in Risk
  • I’m just not that into safety anymore
  • Sticks and Stones and the Nonsense of Zero Harm
  • Courting Infallibility in Safety
  • Indicators of Risk
  • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
  • No Good Reason to Follow Reason
  • Just as Well Culture Doesn’t Listen to Safety
  • What Are the Benefits Of Social Psychology of Risk?
  • Short-Sighted Lenses by Safety
  • Is Safety the Empire of Non-Sense?
  • No Wonder Safety is Confused About Culture
  • Building High Performance Safety Cultures
  • Understanding iCue, a Visual, Verbal, Semiotic Method for Tackling Risk
  • On Culture and Safety
  • Focus on ‘Meeting’ people, not legislation – a path to risk maturity

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

Making Sense of Semiotics and Safety

People are not Rats–Moving Beyond Behaviour Based Safety

Spin, Nonsense Language and Propaganda in Safety

Safety is NOT a Choice

Semiotics and the Unconscious Messages We Send

The Less You See, the More Likely to Die

The Learning (and unlearning) that Revealed my Vocation

‘Can’t Means Won’t Try’ – The Challenge of Being Challenged

Why Safety Isn’t a Choice You Make

Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts

Beware the Cult of Denial

Regulation Madness

You Have No Idea What Goes on in the ‘Real World of Safety’

Safety Myopia

Implementing SPoR in the Workplace, A Video

There is no way I would do that!

Learning Styles Matter

Clarity Enabled

Training Workshops CLLR April to July 2020

Censorship in Safety

Safetie

It’s Always About Paperwork

Understanding Safety as an Archetype

Social Psychology Of Risk Workshops

Words Can Change Your Brain

The Tyranny of Absolutes

Safety Justifies Anything and Everything

Free Safety and Risk Lunch n Learn

Safety Doesn’t Need Military Language

Failure Must be an Option

Face to Face SPoR Workshops 2022

iCue Listening Engagement Manual

Brain-Centredness and Occular-Centredness in Risk

Safety Engagement with Workspace, Headspace and Groupspace

Managing the Unexpected

Safety Isn’t Sexy, and it Shouldn’t Be!

Human Factors Factors

ADVENTURES IN RISK AND SAFETY–KING ZERO

Calculators, Matrices and Mumbo Jumbo Risk Assessment

Coping With Paradox and Ambiguity in Safety

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,496 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?