• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Safety Risk .net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • PSYCH. OF SAFETY & RISK
    • What is Psychological Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Robert Long
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no HIERARCHY of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • Slogans
    • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
    • When Slogans Don’t Work
    • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
    • BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2022
    • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Safety Acronyms
    • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
    • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
    • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
    • Safety Slogans List
    • Road Safety Slogans 2022
    • How to write your own safety slogans
    • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
    • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
    • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
    • Safety Slogans for Work
  • Safety Culture
    • Safety Culture Silences
  • Psychological Safety
You are here: Home / Just Culture / Safety as a Knowledge Culture

Safety as a Knowledge Culture

December 3, 2019 by Dr Rob Long 12 Comments

We all know the saying ‘you can’t see the forest for the trees’ meaning, when you are so deep in something you can’t see what you are in. The saying also captures the dynamic of immersion, of being so deeply committed to something that it takes on a life of its own, on other words it becomes an Archetype. This is how we often speak of Safety as personified and Archtypical, as if it has a life of its own (and I think it does). Sometimes, it is those outside of the forest who are best placed to envision something different. They ask different questions and see the world differently. Sometimes it is the outsider who offers a different vision of possibilities and a creative imagination for understanding different trajectories. We often call such perceptions and observations ‘vision’. When one applies vision to practice we might call this ‘envisioning’.

The idea of knowledge cultures is associated with the movement of transdisciplinarity (and multidisciplinarity) and recognizes Professions as Knowledge Cultures (https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-6091-994-7_2).

In many ways each discipline becomes so immersed in itself that it loses vision of what is outside. We often use the language of ‘silos’ to describe this. When I was in the teaching profession and the clergy professions this was certainly the case. We sometimes use the language of being ‘blinkered’ to describe such phenomena.

Unfortunately, knowledge when enculturated through affirmation and confirmation bias makes one see the world (paradigm-worldview) only through the lens of that discipline. This is one of the dilemmas of professionalization (https://safetyrisk.net/safety-and-risk-professionalisation/), it creates a blinkered view that once politcised institutionalizes knowledge and codifies language so that a fortress is created against change. Soon all criticism is demonized and so the discipline becomes more entrenched within itself. This dynamic was well articulated by Weber (https://www.jstor.org/stable/3234946?seq=1) in the Institutionalisation of the Charisma (see Figure 1).

Figure 1 Institutionalisation of the Charisma

Image result for Institutionalisation of the Charisma

The Institutionalisation of the Charisma is also a challenge in forming associations. Whilst association is good because it builds support of like-for-like it also closes off opportunity for learning outside of itself. Cameron and Quinn captured this beautifully in their work on the Competing Values Framework (https://www.thercfgroup.com/files/resources/an_introduction_to_the_competing_values_framework.pdf). Unfortunately, each discipline ends up creating a closed system of itself through professionalization and enculturates itself into a forest that can’t see what its outside its own trees. This is where transdisciplinarity offers hope, imagination and change (https://safetyrisk.net/so-you-want-culture-change/ ).

One very different knowledge culture to the discipline of Safety is that of Indigenous (First Peoples) culture. When I was a History Teacher in the 1970s we were just starting to realize just how much Indigenous Historiography had been constructed by Western Imperialist Colonialist neo-liberal bias. Rob Pascoe’s work on ‘The Manufacture of Australian History’ was my introduction into just how much History is constructed. Since then I have been involved in Indigenous services through work in government and friendships that have helped inform a completely ‘other’ view of Indigenous culture and history. Bruce Pascoe’s brilliant book Dark Emu is a recent revelation that confirms this understanding (https://www.booktopia.com.au/dark-emu-bruce-pascoe/book/9781921248016.html ).

There could be nothing further removed from the STEM-only worldview than how First Nation Australians understand the world. Indeed, the STEM-only worldview for Indigenous Australians closely represents all they associate with dispossession, power, colonialism and control. I wrote about this First People’s worldview in my latest book (https://www.humandymensions.com/product/the-social-psychology-of-risk-handbook/) pp. 75-78.

One of my favourite articles that demonstrates the gap in knowledge cultures is by Akehurst ‘Smoking Out Evil Spirits’ (Quadrant Jan 2012) https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2012/01-02/smoking-out-evil-spirits/ . In this article Akehurst demonstrates the cognitive dissonance of scientists in CSIRO undertaking a ‘welcome to country’ and ‘smoking ceremony’ to open a new building. Akehust opens his piece by stating ‘Metaphysics is not the business of science’. How true. The article then proceeds through CSIRO documentation to show how this scientific organization has written in policy the acceptance of evil spirits and the cleansing out of physical space of such ‘spirits’. I’d recommend you read the article.

Similarly, the opening of the Australian Parliament acknowledges the same worldview of First People’s (https://www.msn.com/en-au/video/sport/46th-parliament-resumes-with-indigenous-smoking-ceremony/vp-AADJ4S8). In Akehurst’s words: ‘If the CSIRO does not believe in evil spirits, its endorsement of smoking ceremonies is cynical and insulting to Aborigines’. The Australian Parliament that also starts with the Christian Lord’s Prayer (https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/aso/so050). Does the parliament syncretise both traditions in spiritual affirmation?

So, this brings us to the discipline, industry and tradition of safety. If the safety worldview is an engineering and science worldview as is demonstrated by its origins (eg. in the US the American Society of Safety Professionals used to be the American Society of Safety Engineers), how does it engage with other knowledge cultures other than its own? I listed some non-safety knowledge cultures here: https://safetyrisk.net/so-you-want-culture-change/

What does Safety lose by not engaging with other ways of knowing other than its own? Let’s return to the issue of language.

We find throughout the safety industry the reductionist language of ‘components’, ‘factors’, ‘capacities’, ‘properties’ and ‘parts’ dominates its understanding of systems. Indeed, in Safety (regardless of school of thought (https://safetyrisk.net/download-page/download-info/risk-and-safety-schools-of-thought-docx/) and regardless of whether a person denigrates reductionism, the language of reductionism remains dominant in the sector. So whilst there is some condemnation of reductionist scientific approaches to safety, reductionist language is retained to try and understand and manage systems. This is why I prefer the language of ‘ecologies’ to that of ‘systems’. Why does this matter?

What is systems did not act as the sum of component parts? What if systems were autonomous and whole? Or as Maturana and Varela demonstrate are ‘autopoietic’ (https://monoskop.org/images/3/35/Maturana_Humberto_Varela_Francisco_Autopoiesis_and_Congition_The_Realization_of_the_Living.pdf). What if the very questions we ask in safety, regardless of rhetoric, drive us more deeply into a ‘factors’ approach to systems and humans as components in a system?

One of the critical limits of worldviews and disciplines is what their discourse and language permit. One cannot speak or hear a language one doesn’t know. This is why language is the foundation of culture and why it is critical to First nations peoples. Hence in safety, there are many people who speak theologically and don’t know it. Similarly, engineers and scientists use non-STEM metaphors and language and don’t realize how their use of such language constrains and contradicts their message and meaning (semiosis). I have observed recently across all safety schools of thought, the use of language of ‘mystery’, ‘faith’ and ‘grace’ when there are no answers to questions about the autonomy of systems (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327427067_The_Theory_of_Graceful_Extensibility_Basic_rules_that_govern_adaptive_systems). It is interesting that this piece on adaptive systems uses the language cosmology in concert with the language of First People’s cosmology yet holds a fall back position of engineering. Once ‘framed’ through STEM-only one returns to STEM-only. Sustained adaptability is ‘mysterious’ because the worldview doesn’t move. And so, using the theological language and metaphor of ‘graceful extensibility’ Woods seeks to explain the mystery of transition zones. Once again back to the language of factors, components and parts. This is not to say that this paper doesn’t make a valuable contribution but rather the demonstrate that one cannot explain a theory without exploring the language, discourse, metaphor and rhetoric of that theory.

And so, in Safety, end up with a STEM-only institution and political organizing infused with theological, metaphysical and poetic discourse in direct contradiction to identity and practice. Very similar to the CSIRO story.

Could it be that transdisciplinarity offers a new hope for a vision for safety? Could it be that cultures of knowledge we don’t know, despite safety’s use of their language, offer a pathway for safety success? Could it be for all the rhetoric of adaptability that we retreat to a new control system because worldview has not moved? Maybe we have much to learn from First people cultural knowledge more than just patronizing their existence. Maybe the skills required to help make safety people better and move away from the current malaise of bureaucracy-compliance-policing is to be found in other disciplines and a new curriculum.

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • Understanding Psychological Terminology - August 7, 2022
  • Risk Boldly - August 7, 2022
  • Poetics of the Self - August 7, 2022
  • Culture Silences in Safety – What Culture Isn’t - August 7, 2022
  • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it! - August 6, 2022
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Just Culture, Robert Long, Safety Culture, Social Psychology of Risk Tagged With: STEM, transdisciplinarity

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. bernardcorden says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:13 PM

    If you want to destroy a culture destroy its language, which is precisely what social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook do.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      February 13, 2020 at 9:22 PM

      Taking language is the first step in imperialism/colonialism. and, reframing a language is the next step in propaganda. Once you have made language meaningless with stuff like zero, beyond zero, zero plus one or triple zero you can then play the games of fake news and false truths with a population who cannot discern or think critically. A simple study in semantics, semiotics, semiosis or semiology would demonstrate that th decline of cultures is connected to vested interests constructing grammar to suit their desired outcomes, which are rarely in the interets of keeping people well or safe.

      Reply
  2. Admin says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:13 PM

    Just read and enjoyed the Akehurst article – CSIRO look a bit silly don’t they

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      February 13, 2020 at 7:13 PM

      And if you criticise STEM (or safety) you’re deemed anti-STEM. This is because such worldview do not understand dialectic of praxis.
      The first step is to demonise criticism by making non compliance political. This is how First People’s are demonised. So if you are not of us, you must be against us mentalitie. So, STEM doesn’t mature.
      Criticism from outside stimulates those inside to dissonance and response, to help advance and mature the organisation. When conformity bias rules inside criticism ceases. So CSIRO (and safety) becomes a closed non-adaptive system and nothing changes.

      Reply
    • Rob long says

      February 13, 2020 at 7:13 PM

      I think it says much about STEM-only knowledge culture and it’s inability to think outside of its worldview. Of course in doing so misses out on the richness and vision of transdisciplinarity.

      Reply
  3. bernardcorden says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:13 PM

    It is quite evident via the incessant puerile sludge such as Safety II, Safety Differently, Human Factors and Resilience Engineering, which is repeatedly regurgitated on most safety blogs and at numerous safety conferences. The message is often delivered by unenlightened narcissists and merely creates an obsessive contagion with aggressive egocentric ambitions and delusions about ends and means.

    They might have the answer but they are typically part of the problem and are merely eking out a deceptive false existence via an insatiable desire to win at all costs and sustain a politically correct self-image with and obedience to the orthodoxy. We need less reformation and more transformation.

    These chowderheaded “thought leaders” do not embrace genuine emancipation but freedom for their new ideology or brand of Kool Aid.

    “There is nothing more tragic in the contemporary era than the misuse of power and action” – Thomas Merton

    Reply
  4. Admin says

    December 4, 2019 at 2:16 PM

    Just read and enjoyed the Akehurst article – CSIRO look a bit silly don’t they

    Reply
    • Rob long says

      December 4, 2019 at 4:33 PM

      I think it says much about STEM-only knowledge culture and it’s inability to think outside of its worldview. Of course in doing so misses out on the richness and vision of transdisciplinarity.

      Reply
    • Rob Long says

      December 4, 2019 at 4:56 PM

      And if you criticise STEM (or safety) you’re deemed anti-STEM. This is because such worldview do not understand dialectic of praxis.
      The first step is to demonise criticism by making non compliance political. This is how First People’s are demonised. So if you are not of us, you must be against us mentalitie. So, STEM doesn’t mature.
      Criticism from outside stimulates those inside to dissonance and response, to help advance and mature the organisation. When conformity bias rules inside criticism ceases. So CSIRO (and safety) becomes a closed non-adaptive system and nothing changes.

      Reply
  5. bernardcorden says

    December 4, 2019 at 8:13 AM

    It is quite evident via the incessant puerile sludge such as Safety II, Safety Differently, Human Factors and Resilience Engineering, which is repeatedly regurgitated on most safety blogs and at numerous safety conferences. The message is often delivered by unenlightened narcissists and merely creates an obsessive contagion with aggressive egocentric ambitions and delusions about ends and means.

    They might have the answer but they are typically part of the problem and are merely eking out a deceptive false existence via an insatiable desire to win at all costs and sustain a politically correct self-image with and obedience to the orthodoxy. We need less reformation and more transformation.

    These chowderheaded “thought leaders” do not embrace genuine emancipation but freedom for their new ideology or brand of Kool Aid.

    “There is nothing more tragic in the contemporary era than the misuse of power and action” – Thomas Merton

    Reply
  6. bernardcorden says

    December 3, 2019 at 9:58 PM

    If you want to destroy a culture destroy its language, which is precisely what social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook do.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      December 4, 2019 at 6:47 AM

      Taking language is the first step in imperialism/colonialism. and, reframing a language is the next step in propaganda. Once you have made language meaningless with stuff like zero, beyond zero, zero plus one or triple zero you can then play the games of fake news and false truths with a population who cannot discern or think critically. A simple study in semantics, semiotics, semiosis or semiology would demonstrate that th decline of cultures is connected to vested interests constructing grammar to suit their desired outcomes, which are rarely in the interets of keeping people well or safe.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,464 other subscribers

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Rob Long on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Wynand on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on Culture Silences in Safety – What Culture Isn’t
  • Rob Long on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Rob Long on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Brent Charlton on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Richard Brookes on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Rob Long on The Rhizome as a Learning Model for Risk
  • Ooker on The Rhizome as a Learning Model for Risk
  • Rob Long on Safety Doesn’t Need Military Language
  • Manjit Handa on Safety Doesn’t Need Military Language
  • Rob Long on Why Safety is Attracted to Behaviourism
  • Ricardo Montero on Why Safety is Attracted to Behaviourism
  • Admin on Culture Silences in Safety – Ritual
  • Anonymous on Culture Silences in Safety – Ritual
  • Rob Long on Cultural Silences in Safety – Power and Politics
  • Admin on Cultural Silences in Safety – Power and Politics
  • Rob Long on Doing Away With Health and Safety–Language and People
  • Rob Long on Why Safety is Attracted to Behaviourism

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2022
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • Road Safety Slogans 2022
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • 15 Safety Precautions When Working With Electricity
  • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS, CHECKISTS, REGISTERS, TEMPLATES and APPS
  • What Is Safety?
  • Free Risk Assessment Template in Excel Format
  • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace

Recent Posts

  • Understanding Psychological Terminology
  • Risk Boldly
  • Poetics of the Self
  • Culture Silences in Safety – What Culture Isn’t
  • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • When Only More Guilt Will Do
  • How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Keep Counting Every Time You Don’t Achieve Your Goal, That’s Professional
  • Safety and Non-Neuroscience
  • Paperwork and Usability in Tackling Risk
  • Safety as a Masculinist Activity
  • You Don’t Want a Compliance Culture
  • The Soul of Mental Health
  • Identity and Safety
  • Psychosocial Controls and Measures for Who?
  • Linguistics and Safety
  • Not a Profession’s Bootlace
  • Cultural Silences in Safety – Power and Politics
  • History and Safety
  • What is Psychosocial Safety
  • A Guide to Psychosocial Safety Skills
  • Doing Away With Health and Safety–Language and People
  • The New Enemy of Safety – The Unconscious
  • Tape Down Those Leads
  • More Safety Code to Disguise Behaviourism
  • Why Safety is Attracted to Behaviourism
  • Safety Culture–Hudson’s Model
  • Understanding Safety as an Archetype
  • The Purpose of Safety
  • Learning Styles Matter
  • Due Diligence and Holistic Ergonomics Workshops
  • Having FUN in Safety FUNdamentalism
  • 80% of Safety Practitioners Are Idiots
  • Risk Homeostasis Theory–Why Safety Initiatives Go Wrong
  • Culture Silences in Safety – Semiotics
  • Flooding is Dangerous, and I don’t Mean the Water….
  • Cultural Silences in Safety – Aesthetics
  • Impacts of Cognitive Dissonance in the Workplace
  • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
  • Risky Conversations, The Law, Social Psychology and Risk
  • Due Diligence Videos – 10000 downloads
  • Release the Safety Monster and Wreck a Good TV Show
  • Paper Safe
  • Safety Starts with Us
  • Investigations and Heuristics
  • Barry’s Latest Safety Innovation Discovery
  • The Human Race…
  • The ASSP Getting Complacency Completely Wrong
  • What in the (Risk & Safety) World is Imagination?
  • Understanding Safety Myths

FEATURED POSTS

Counter Intuitive Safety

Three Cheers for the Safety Literalists

Goals and Vision in Safety

Sense-Making and Decision-Making in Risk

10 Reasons Why Safety Can Never Make You Happy

The Safety Worldview

The Emperor has no Clothes – Beyond Behaviour-Based Safety

Hoodwinked by Heinrich

Making the World fit the Safety Worldview

Risky Conversations, The Law, Social Psychology and Risk

What Are Observation-Conversation Skills?

Ten Risk and Safety Program Essentials

Courage to Challenge the Great TRIFR and LTIFR Delusion

Safety in Design as if Humans Matter

The Challenge of the Consciousness Taboo

Why is fallibility so challenging in the workplace?

Banning Head Protection is Safer

The Fallible Factor and What to Do About It

Tentative at Tooleybuc

The Fear of Power and the Power of Fear

The Trajectory of Zero Vision

Envisioning Risk in Canada

How is the unconscious in communication critical for understanding and managing risk?

Suicide Prevention – a Social Psychological Perspective

A Philosophy of Safety

Safety Gives Me the Right over Other Rights

Social Sensemaking – Book Launch Dates & Venues Confirmed

Traditional Safety

The Perils of Excessive Safety Management Systems

I’ve got a feeling this isn’t right, but…..

I’m just not that into safety anymore

Living In Glass Houses

Humanising Workplace Health and Safety Management

Is Risk and Safety Perfectionism a Disorder?

An Introduction to Semiotics and Risk

The Different Levels of Wrongness!

Anxiety and Fear Professionals

Like a Rhizome Cowboy

The Seduction to Simplify Safety

Emotions, Bias and Heuristics in Risk

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,464 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

What is Psychological Safety at Work?