• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychosocial Safety
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety
      • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
      • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
      • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
      • What is Psychosocial Safety
      • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
      • What is Psychological Safety?
      • Understanding Psychological Terminology
      • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
      • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
      • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / Behaviour Based Safety / No Safety in Numbers

No Safety in Numbers

August 13, 2022 by Dr Rob Long 14 Comments

Originally posted on June 9, 2021 @ 8:04 PM

No Safety in Numbers

I was asked to present recently to a group in the USA on the fixation/psychosis of Safety with numbers. I started with the title of this blog making two points: that you are no safer in a crowd/group, dispelling the myth ‘there is always safety in numbers’ and then spoke on the history of the safety industry and why it has developed ‘numerics psychosis’.

The Bystander Effect

There is plenty of evidence in Social Psychology to dispel the myth that one is safe the more people are about. The ‘Genovese Effect’ or ‘Bystander Effect’ (https://www.simplypsychology.org/bystander-effect.html ) demonstrates that perception of risk changes when ‘Groupthink’ is present (https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/groupthink ). Indeed, Groupthink in itself plays a strong role in shaping the decision making of individuals in groups. The powerful dynamics of group pressure can be simply dangerous. We see this often in mass movements and trends in politics where people can be so easily swayed by Propaganda. You can have a look at experiments in Groupthink here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSsPfbup0ac

Understanding the shaping of decision making is a principle interest for the Social Psychology of Risk (SPoR). This is why we have developed a map of social influence dynamics that you can download for free here: https://spor.com.au/downloads/posters/

clip_image002

Whilst it is one thing to know there are hundreds of social influencing forces in groups, it’s quite another to understand how they work and in combinations to shape decision making. What this shows is that the simplistic claims of behaviorist nonsense like Behaviour Based Safety (BBS) is completely concocted BS. Most parents already know about Peer Pressure (Groupthink) when their children demand something in order to conform to their group (not the norms their parent expects). But these are only a few of the dynamics at work. One would need to understand much more of Social Psychology to understand how many of these forces affect decision making at work. Then more work would be needed and research to understand how these pressures affect judgments about risk. Of course, the mono-disciplinary WHS curriculum and AIHS BoK have shown no interest in this research for the past 20 years and so maintain a nonsense behaviourist ethic that simply doesn’t work. Poor olds safety busy counting apples in an orange grove.

Numerics Psychosis

In the second half of the presentation I put forward many slide shots of safety websites that demonstrates that all safety knows is numbers and counting. Furthermore, most of what counts in life, living and being is not counted in Safety. Safety only counts what can be counted. The things that are essential in organisations and groups like: love, helping, trust, respect, relationship, care, helping and ethics are of no interest to this industry. Safety only shows an interest in the counting of objects and objects for counting.

The very essentials of what makes for: effective relationships, communication effectiveness, sustainable organizing, political harmony, stability in institutions and envisioning risk is nowhere to be found in any curriculum anywhere in safety.

I asked the group who had all studied a degree in safety if any had received any skill development or curriculum in: observations, listening, conversation, helping skills and social psychology – not one.

Yet, all had been swamped with regulation, legislation (that they will never use) and endless bureaucracy focused on counting injury statistics, that have no relation to the presence of safety.

Of course, then came from the group that old aphorism ‘you can’t manage what you can’t measure’ a wonderful excuse for a sad industry deluded by the idea that a number can be attributed to a value. This silly aphorism is completely false. All of the things that matter most in life cannot be measured neither counted. The most important things required in organisations that help people be safe cannot be measured nor counted.

There is no relationship between injury numbers and the creation of safety!

We then travelled back in time to realize that all of this concocted nonsense and creating belief in numbers started with the Heinrich delusion (https://safetyrisk.net/ration-delusions-and-heinrichs-hoax/ ) and nonsense ideas that were made up by insurance salesmen and engineers who had no cognizance of how their models would fix this industry to injury rates. Now this industry has evolved to this psychosis of counting and the delusions of zero that create a fixation of petty risk.

All in the group acknowledged that the industry was now broken and wasn’t focused on what they had enter safety for, helping persons tackle risk.

Sadly, the conference ended with people feeling powerless to change things. Most decried their association and other associations for making no change to the delusions of the WHS curriculum or a body of knowledge that simply deepens the false consciousness on objects and numbers.

What a sad indictment when so much is available that works: https://www.humandymensions.com/product/it-works-a-new-approach-to-risk-and-safety/

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • A Leadership Worldview for Psychosocial Safety - February 5, 2023
  • How to Do the Best Risk Assessment - February 4, 2023
  • Tensions and Faultiness in Risk - February 4, 2023
  • Psychosocial Safety, Following-Leading in Risk - February 4, 2023
  • Free Program on Due Diligence - February 4, 2023
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Behaviour Based Safety, Robert Long Tagged With: BBS, numbers, safety models

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Rob Long says

    June 17, 2021 at 8:26 AM

    Nicholas, the focus has to be on culture and how this sets organisational ethos. Real leadership knows this is the beginning and end of safety mindfulness. This specific focus on data and possible scenarios simply draws attention away from what is most important. Safety indoctrination wins the day again. And so nothing improves.

    Reply
    • Nicholas says

      June 18, 2021 at 9:00 AM

      Thank you for your continued responses Rob. Sounds like the next step is to begin shifting the internal paradigm’s of leadership to move away from the hard science to softer interpersonal and intrapersonal data sets. Is there a particular metric you (or others) have found effective at generating the ‘A-ha!’ moments we need corporate leaders to experience?

      Reply
      • Rob Long says

        June 18, 2021 at 10:17 AM

        Nicholas, many don’t realise just how much their worldview has been shaped by the behaviorist and scientist paradigm about them. Indeed, you language about soft and hard is pretty typical of such influence. There is no ‘soft’ or ‘hard’ leadership or approach to anything, there is however people/person centric approaches and non-person approaches, the pejorative language is just a creation of a worldview that attributes soft and hard to views that privilege assumptions about science and data. There is no such thing as ‘hard’ science, again an attribution of a worldview. Similarly, asking for metrics as proof is anchored to the same delusional attributions that we never accept in real life. eg. your relationships are based on faith, there is no evidence that the trust you put in another is well founded. All social life works like this, including good leadership. Good leaders know just how tenuous their work is, if they think leadership can be measured by data, they won’t last long.
        This is why understanding worldviews and critical thinking is so important. The skill of critical thinking beyond the delusions of scientist and behaviorism is where to start and to do so with effective questioning eg. what assurance does this data give us that we will be safe tomorrow? How do you know that what we do in safety works? What assurance would be acceptable to a court that what we do works? You won’t get the answer to any of these questions with any of the mumbo jumbo safety trots out.

        Reply
  2. Nicholas says

    June 10, 2021 at 2:02 AM

    Rob, I have begun to wonder if the hard realities of business are what forces safety to numbers, not an ideological failure of the safety world. I agree we only manage what we measure but I am ill equipped as a traditionally trained safety manager to explain how trust or ethics could be reasonably measured and demonstrated to improve the safety conditions of the workplace. I believe this is true but I have only personal bias and whatever qualitative measures I can stick against the wall to back up my argument.

    I think part of the truth is that BBS is fundamentally much easier and cleaner to manage and present to higher-ups. It naturally drives more manager – associate engagement which I believe is the only part of BBS approaching a value add or secret sauce. I can easily measure if someone is maintaining good posture, but I don’t have a scalable data-driven method to measure how much peer pressure they are feeling to work faster or more efficiently which they are willing (knowingly or unknowingly) to accept more personal risk to achieve.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      June 10, 2021 at 12:52 PM

      Nicholas, I think you underestimate the power of ideology. The ideology/semiotics of zero is far more powerful than the mechanics of business. Business moves mostly by pragmatics and could be easily shifted as its core business is dominated by economics/profit. Just look how business is shifting now on climate change.
      You are right however, Safety has no need for ethics or critical thinking when it can be anchored to zero and measurement. So, most people who undertake a safety qualification are ill equipped to do much more than count. The engineering assumptions of Safety simply apply attributions to the validity of quantitative measures, that is not how we live in the real world where most things that matter cannot be measured.
      Again, the acceptance of behaviourism and scientism are attributions accepted by the mono-disciplinary view of safety. There are plenty of other valid views, but they are never countenanced by the ideology of compliance, politicized by compliance. Zero only accepts one view and assumes that the only reality is a number.
      The only reason BBS is attributed as working is a strange attribution that behaviours can be measured, which they can’t. You actually can’t ‘measure’ good posture without context, there is no neutral or objective ‘rule’ or ‘measure’ for posture. This is just one way in which the ideology of behaviourist thought has captured the safety industry into false consciousness. Measures are only thought of as objective and measureable if you accept and don’t challenge the delusions of behaviourism and the many accepted models of safety that are all concocted rubbish. Take any of this mumbo jumbo to the courts and you will be laughed at by a proper profession.

      Reply
      • Nicholas says

        June 16, 2021 at 7:39 AM

        Rob, thank you for replying to my post. I agree with the main thrust of your point and I think my earlier response could be boiled down to: a lack of meaningful quantitative measurement that has predictive power related to incident severity or frequency has resulted in safety persons desperately clinging onto qualitative models of questionable to laughable validity and reproducibility.

        This led to the realization that I have a significant gap in my skillset, namely the ability to translate the qualitative measures or evaluations (I still can’t put a KPI on trust, try as I might) into quantitative analysis which the business leaders use to make decisions. Is the path forward to convince the Operations / Business crowd that the qualitative measurements are superior to the quantitative ones, or should we seek to attach more discrete quantitative measurements to the existing qualitative measurements?

        Reply
        • Rob Long says

          June 16, 2021 at 8:14 AM

          Nicholas, the quantitative vs qualitative debate hinges on strong biases and mythology based in Scientism and Behaviourism, Even the idea of validity by repetition is an assumption of th scientific method myth and what it considers valid.
          My point is, this is not a binary competitive thing but rather finding balance in a dialectical way so that we are not trapped into validating one form of knowing over another. This includes the crazy idea that numbers are objective and narrative/stories/images are not. All data is interpreted according to philosophical assumptions. It’s just that safety has been indoctrinated over a long period of time to reject qualitative ways of knowing and invalidate non-measurable ways of knowing.
          Isn’t it strange that a CEO would rather know injury rates than know how much they are trusted? I know which of these best generates a culture that is safer than the other. Similarly, the level of skepticism and cynicism in discourse and language also generate much less safe environments, regardless of how numerics are reported. Indeed, even the method of reporting itself can create all kinds of toxic environments that make the workplace less safe.
          As for predictive power, just one more indoctrinated delusion of scientism. When it comes to knowing purpose and meaningfulness in relationships, metrics is simply unhelpful.

          Reply
          • Nicholas says

            June 17, 2021 at 5:19 AM

            I think executives are interested in what they can measure and use to justify performance bonuses, etc. I would struggle to sell my argument that the relative level of trust a GE wage worker places into Jack Welch has a direct impact on their chances of being involved in a safety incident or their level of resilience. What is difficult for me is convincing them a non-reproducible, difficult to scale, manually gathered, qualitative measurement is better than their current focus on engineering based measurements.

            Example situation: a person is working on a ladder near a floor opening that they could fall into. If I asked a group of different associates what the risk of that task was and if it was ‘safe’ it seems the the variance of risk tolerance among a sufficiently large group of people would give such a range of responses that it would be difficult to give an answer as to what is “safe.” In contrast most companies have a height limit or other quantitative value in the equation.

            Have you found any specific measurements to be good starting points in discussion or presentation of data? I actually capture some of these sentiments in e-questionnaire’s daily but have found little if any link between incidents and emotional sentiment based on my small data pool.

  3. Caring-for-people-in-fear says

    June 9, 2021 at 10:15 PM

    Rob, the “…fixation/psychosis of Safety with numbers” WILL not stop. Not in the USA. You can present direct evidence that this leads to MORE injury and MORE deaths and it will not matter, the cult of Zero and cognitive dissonance runs so deep.I do not believe almost anything can be presented that would change the mindset. Now this is not meant to be cute or funny but maybe if you could successfully tie Heinrich to racism (after all he did believe in eugenics) you would get people’s attention. But honestly, I think the Safety trade is so embedded in binary logic, I do not believe is hope, there is too much money and power tied to the status quo.

    Reply
    • Rob LOng says

      June 10, 2021 at 12:33 PM

      Thanks for your post and you may be right. Until there is fundamental reform in curriculum, ethic and body of knowledge in movement away from zero not much can change. Then of course there are the vested interests who gain politically from keeping everything as it is.
      However, I don’t give up hope and perhaps one day Safety will move away from zero and grow up. Some people are listening and many are unhappy with their associations and zero ideology, but those in power simply don’t know what to do, there is no vision.

      Reply
  4. simon cassin says

    June 9, 2021 at 9:08 PM

    Hi Rob, thank you for your blog. As always the content was both interesting and informative. I was wondering if you felt the philosophical principle of charity could be beneficial and help us consider claims and counterclaims in a more productive manner? I realise that this approach can be more time consuming and often requires a more nuanced approach to debate. Perhaps it’s the nature of common communication platforms which make this approach hard to adopt?

    There appears to be a broad approach to debate and disagreement which fails to recognise the importance and benefits of this principle. I believe you quite rightly acknowledge the important contribution disciplines such as social psychology make to our understanding and development of appropriate H&S paradigms and approaches. But as you know the ecological validity and generalisation of research findings from the social sciences can be problematic.

    Is it also possible that other disciplines such as philosophy and art may also have a part to play in our search for a wider and more comprehensive understanding of human existence? Having a particular interest in philosophy, I am always alert to assertions about political philosophy, ethics, epistemology, rights and obligations, linguistics etc. On many occasions I would argue that people tend to approach philosophical concepts with a non-philosophical mindset. But I could be wrong.

    Thanks again Rob.

    All the best Simon

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      June 10, 2021 at 12:28 PM

      Thanks for the questions Simon. The language of ‘charity’ in some ways is quite antiquated and not used much these days. In some circles it is even given a pejorative tone. However, the language of helping and helping professions seems more common. Unfortunately, the ideology of zero allows no space for ‘charity’ and understands charity as weakness leading to harm. There is no tolerance in zero, no adjustment or debate in zero, its zero or nothing. That is what safety has become. This is one of the principle reasons why safety stopped learning some years ago and refuses or countenances discussion or debate. The principle of zero is anti-charity and anti-learning.
      The problematising of social science is no different from any other discipline such is the nature of subjectivity and the way in which H&S has anchored itself to a worldview that assumes scientific objectivity, even safety objectivity.
      Unfortunately, Safety also shows no interest in philosophy, critical thinking, debate or transdisciplinarity so, until there is movement away from zero not much is likely to change, leaving safety as an unprofessional back water.

      Reply
  5. Brian Edwin Darlington says

    June 9, 2021 at 8:09 PM

    Great Blog as always Rob

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      June 10, 2021 at 3:14 PM

      Thanks Brian, I just discuss what I see from my worldview.

      Reply

Do you have any thoughts? Please share them below Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,500 other subscribers

RECOMMENDED READING

viral post – iso 45003 and what it cannot do

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

Psychosocial Safety and Mental Health Series

A Leadership Worldview for Psychosocial Safety

Psychosocial Safety, Following-Leading in Risk

Not Just Another ‘Hazard’

Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?

How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety

ISO 45003 and What it Cannot Do

The KISS of Death in Safety

Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health

The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’

The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health

More Posts from this Category

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Rob Long on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • simon p cassin on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • simon p cassin on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Rob long on How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • Rob Long on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Rob Long on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Matt Thorne on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • simon p cassin on Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • Hurak Learning on How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • Rob Long on An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Paul Gentles on An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Brent Charlton on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Rob Long on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Brian on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Jaise on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Rob Long on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Linda McKendry on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Rob long on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Matt Thorne on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • Road Safety Slogans 2023
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • A Leadership Worldview for Psychosocial Safety
  • NATIONAL SAFETY DAY/WEEK IN INDIA 2023
  • Proving Safety
  • 15 Safety Precautions When Working With Electricity
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • What Is Safety?
  • ISO 45003 and What it Cannot Do

Recent Posts

  • A Leadership Worldview for Psychosocial Safety
  • How to Do the Best Risk Assessment
  • Tensions and Faultiness in Risk
  • Psychosocial Safety, Following-Leading in Risk
  • Free Program on Due Diligence
  • Not Just Another ‘Hazard’
  • Work-Life and Risk, Feminine Perspectives
  • Psychosocial Safety, Is it possible to make it culturally normal?
  • How to Be Oriented Towards Psychosocial and Mental Health in Safety
  • Free Download – Real Risk – New Book by Dr Robert Long
  • Proving Safety
  • ISO 45003 and What it Cannot Do
  • Harming People in the Name of Good
  • An Advanced Understanding of Culture – A Video
  • Risk and Safety Maturity
  • The KISS of Death in Safety
  • SPoR, Metanoia and a Podcast on Change with Nippin Anand
  • Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health
  • The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’
  • SPoR Comes to Vienna June 2023
  • The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • The Visionary Imagination – Louisa Lawson
  • Heaven ‘n Hell and the Safety Religion
  • Confirmity in Conformity
  • Numerology and Psychic Numbing
  • Thinking of Mortality
  • Safety is the Wrong Anchor
  • Foresight Blindness, Hindsight Bias and Risk
  • Getting the Balance Right in Tackling Risk
  • What is SPoR?
  • How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Afraid to Let Go of What Doesn’t Work in Safety
  • When You Don’t Know What to do in Safety, Have Another Blitz!!!
  • Gloves and Glasses Compliance
  • A Case of Desensitisation – What Would You Do?
  • How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • The Mythic Symbology of Safety
  • Dark Waters, The True Story of DuPont and Zero
  • 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Am I stupid? I didn’t think of that…
  • Don’t Look Now Safety, Your Metaphor is Showing
  • Ratio Delusions and Heinrich’s Hoax
  • To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Culture as a Wicked Problem, for Safety
  • Safety Leadership Training
  • Cultural Orientation in Risk
  • The Stanford Experiment and The Social Psychology of Risk
  • Objectivity, Audits and Attribution When Calculating Risk
  • Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

The Banned Objects Index – A New Development in Safety Culture

Understanding Habit, Habituation and Change

The Psychology of Leadership in Risk

Why Metaphors Matter in Risk

Why Would You Talk That Way?

What is the Mind of Safety?

Why Safety Doesn’t See Things

Three Cheers for the Safety Literalists

Is Safetyism Destroying a Generation?

Natural Born Learners

A must watch risk and safety video

What in the (Risk & Safety) World is Imagination?

First in Best Dressed for Indoctrination

Online Inductions and Safety Effectiveness

Safetie

20 Cognitive Biases That Affect Risk Decision Making

WHS Legislation is NOT about Safety it’s about Culture

The Domino Myth in Safety

Can There be a Feminist Safety?

Safety Leadership Training

Understanding Safety Myths

Risk and Safety Rituals

Semiotics, Semiology and Safety Sense

How to use signs, symbols and text effectively in communicating about risk

‘Can’t Means Won’t Try’ – The Challenge of Being Challenged

Due Diligence Workshop Sydney 20,21 February 2019

Gestures in Risk Management – A Podcast

Safety is an Art

Social Sensemaking – Book Launch Dates & Venues Confirmed

Zero as Morally Wicked

The Foundations of Safety

Understanding Psychological Terminology

Safety is NOT a Choice

Safety and the Spin of Disruption

Talking Risk Videos – Humanising Workers Compensation

Social Psychology of Risk Post-Grad Pics

Foresight Blindness, Hindsight Bias and Risk

Social Psychology of Risk Two Day Workshop

It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!

Non-Binary Decision Making in Risk

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,500 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?


WHAT IS PSYCHOSOCIAL SAFETY