Mapping Social Influence Strategies
People who train in STEM-only industries like those in risk, safety and security tend to be naïve and mis-educated about the nature of social influence. A search through any of the texts in risk and safety curriculum on the marked indicate strong influences of STEM-only behaviourist thinking. In the risk and safety industries the curriculum is primarily focused on humans as objects in systems hence the expression ‘human factors’. As long as risk and safety seek reform through STEM thinking, there will be no reform of either industry (https://safetyrisk.net/isnt-it-time-we-reformed-the-whs-curriculum/ ).
Industries that are naïve about the nature of perception, motivation and social influence tend to be ‘binary’ (black and white) about human activity and understand humans through a behaviourist lens. The discourse of zero is the outcome of this binary behaviourist ideology.
The behaviourist view understands humans simplistically as the sum of inputs and outputs. The behaviourst view of motivation is equal to the success of the ‘pleasure and pain principle’. Motivation for behaviourism is based on a materialist assumption and so motivation is just about positive or negative reinforcement. Unfortunately, this is an interpretation of human being that is attributed but doesn’t fit. Humans are far more complex than this imposition, which is why a behaviourist method only work sporadically or temporarily.
When we adopt a transdisciplinary approach to human activity we spread our view of curriculum across the disciplines rather than being locked in one worldview (https://safetyrisk.net/transdisciplinary-safety/ ). If one were to consider anything that is known in the discipline of social psychology and apply that to risk and safety, the whole worldview would change because the frame of understanding humans shifts from a mechanical view to a view that includes social being.
In order to better understand strategies in human social influence I have offered readers of this blog a free A3 poster download of my Mapping of Social Influence Strategies tool. Hopefully this might help readers understand the complexities of social influence and dispel the naïve discourse associated with behaviourist binary ideology that dominates the risk and safety industry. You won’t find anything like this in any risk and safety text, body of knowledge or zero handbook.
Please note: The tool is copyright to Dr Robert Long so cannot be on-sold or used in a commercial setting without permission. Dr Long doesn’t give permission for this tool to be used commercially without prior training in SPoR. Training in SPoR gives context to the tool and allows its proper use.
Those who study with the Social Psychology of Risk (SPoR) in the Centre for Leadership and Learning in Risk (https://cllr.com.au/) normally spend a day working through this mapping tool with either Dr Long or one of the lecturers (https://cllr.com.au/register-to-study/cllr-prospectus/ ). The tool is focused on the eight primary dynamics in social influence, these are:
- Reciprocation
-
Consistency
-
Social Proof
-
Liking
-
Authority
-
Scarcity
-
Landscaping and
-
Altercasting
These dynamics are mapped accordingly:
DOWNLOAD THE A3 VERSION HERE: Mapping-Social-Influence-Strategies-diagram-A3-002.pdf (1350 downloads)
Dr Rob Long
Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)
- Ritual as Embodied Learning in Safety - September 23, 2021
- Who Give’s a Toss About Safety? What About Care Ethics? - September 21, 2021
- What Theory of Learning is Embedded in Your Investigation Methodology? - September 20, 2021
- ‘Ethical Responsibility’ in Safety, You’re on Your Own Baby! - September 18, 2021
- An Ethic for Dobbing In Safety - September 15, 2021
Leave a Reply