Continuing with our series on Psychosocial Safety
Dos and Don’ts
- Don’t ever associate Psychosocial and Mental Health with hazards. Whilst Psychosocial and Mental Health pose many challenges for organisations, these challenges are NOT hazards. Such language can only ever toxify the workplace and create Psychosocial harm.
- Don’t consider for a second that Psychosocial and Mental Health issues can be ‘fixed’ or ‘controlled’.
- Don’t follow any advice given by Safety Codes of Practice or AIHS BoK Chapter on Psychosocial and Mental Health to dictate your response to persons. Psychosocial and Mental Health is about the care of persons NOT the outcomes of Safety Management Systems.
- Similarly, don’t go to any training that describes Psychosocial and Mental Health as a ‘hazard’.
- Don’t attempt to list any Psychosocial and Mental Health issue on any register or documentation. (If any registration of any Psychosocial and Mental Health issues can ever be connected back to any person then, anything from that time forward is worth nothing).
- Don’t use the language of ‘zero’ from your organisation. Intolerance is a recipe for brutalism and toxicity.
- Don’t register any Psychosocial and Mental health issue on a hazard register.
- Don’t support FIFO.
- Don’t speak nonsense to people about the ‘whole person’ when. You know that safety is NOT holistic.
- Don’t insult real professions by using the label ‘profession’ for safety.
- Don’t confess any Psychosocial and Mental Health issue to any organisation that preaches zero or who will record your confession.
- Do promote Psychosocial and Mental Health that requires: tolerance, empathy, care, helping, compassion, confidentiality, understanding, ethical practice, listening.
- Do read books and listen to professional resources on pastoral care, helping, listening, care ethics etc. Start with Gerard Egan The Skilled Helper.
- Do all you can to only take any Psychosocial and Mental Health issues to a professional, educated and experienced in Psychosocial and Mental health. Safety is not a profession. Safety has no ethic of care.
- Do access professional resources and reading on well-being (eg. John Kabbat-Zinn, Julia Cameron).
- Do study Holistic Ergonomics (https://cllr.com.au/product/holistic-ergonomics-unit-6/ ) and Do reject toxic practices like ‘hot desking’ that harm persons.
- Don’t go to any safety source for help in understanding well-being.
- Don’t give advice in Psychosocial and Mental Health.
- Don’t identify Psychosocial and Mental Health as a safety issue.
- Don’t count Psychosocial and Mental health as safety data.
- Don’t use the word ‘consultation’ when its real meaning is code for ‘telling’.
- Don’t ever take advice from engineers, behaviourists of so called ‘safety science’ on Psychosocial and Mental health.
- Don’t give advice on Psychosocial and Mental Health if you are neither qualified or experienced..
- Do learn the names and contacts of all Psychosocial and Mental Health professionals in your area.
- Do know the number and contacts for Lifeline and other associated Psychosocial and Mental health services.
- Do refer any Psychosocial and Mental Health issue to a professional. Safety is not a caring profession.
- Do validate all forms of knowing and belief systems for helping including, religious and spiritual beliefs of persons presenting with a Psychosocial and Mental Health issue.
- Do include Spirituality and Religion in your definition of culture.
- Do use Chaplains and other spiritual resources that many people under trauma and Mental health pressures find helpful.
- Do ensure you are open to unfamiliar ways of knowing and help for First Nations People and those from different cultures. Culture is NOT ‘what we do around here’.
- Do seek knowledge and professional expertise on stress, distress, eustress, destress, trauma and PTSI. (eg. Gabor Mate, Besser Van Der Kolk).
- Do develop an ethic of personhood, the foundation for all care, helping and ethics. The safety industry has nothing on any of this.
I don’t often do this but to simply state that this advice is based on, over 40 year’s experience and research in the area of Psychosocial and Mental Health including: work in Youth Detention Centres across the ACT and NSW, work in ACT and NSW prisons, Manager ACT Youth and Community Services, Work in Child Protection and Foster Care, Founder Galilee School for Youth At-Risk, Work in Not-for-profit and Non-Government sectors in Family Counselling, Mental Health and Well-Being. Manager of ACT Youth Indigenous Services, Representation on National Substance Abuse, Alcohol and Drug Taskforce, ACT Sentencing Review, Member – National Clearinghouse on Early Intervention and Prevention of Drug Abuse, Member – National Youth Affairs Research Scheme, Criminal Justice System Committee. Member – Community Services Ministerial Advisory Council on Gambling. Manager of Crisis Centre Canberra Bushfires. Lecturer in Social Work and Youth Work at ACU. Founder of the ACT Youth Worker in Schools Project through ACU. Academically Rob has majors in in Pastoral Psychology, Education Psychology and Social Psychology.
The ISO 45003:2021 – Occupational health and safety management – Psychological health and safety at work – Guidelines for managing psychosocial risks is dangerous nonsense that will only lead to greater toxicity in workplaces, the further suppression of care and brutalism of the highest order. Well done Safety.
Dr Rob Long
Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)
- Relationships as Therapy for Mental Health, A Note for Safety - September 10, 2024
- Cultivating Resilience - September 8, 2024
- No Place for Military Metaphors in Safety - September 6, 2024
- The Influence of C.G. Jung in SPoR - September 5, 2024
- Sacrificing Truth for No Blame - September 3, 2024
Rob Long says
Rosa, the language of ‘hazard’ is completely inappropriate and pejorative. No professional in work in mental health would ever use such language. It demonstrates how unprofessional safety is.
No mental health issue or psychosocial issue is helped by such language nor should any of this be coupled to the hierarchy of controls. Simply delusional stuff. The use of hazard objectifies persons and should be rejected by any professional.
The language of ‘fixing’ is also inappropriate and demonstrates naivety about mental health.
I think that any involvement of poorly trained and inexperienced safety people in this area is both dangerous and harmful. This doesn’t negate any will to care or help but the complexities of mental health are not helped by the safety worldview.
Similarly, there is no curriculum in safety that supports any involvement in this work.
The other concerning thing is the global mantra of zero. The last thing anyone with mental health concerns needs is intolerance and a fixation on counting injury rates.
Rosa Carrillo says
Excellent and thought provoking article. The list of dos and don’ts is helpful. I do need clarification on a couple of points
-“Similarly, don’t go to any training that describes Psychosocial and Mental Health as a ‘hazard’.” Mental health is not a hazard it is a state of mind. A hazard could be bullying which impacts mental health. We would want to address that hazard.
-“Don’t identify Psychosocial and Mental Health as a safety issue.” I guess this is the central issue. How does mental health even end up on the safety and health advisors area of responsibility? The connection I saw immediately was that poor mental health needs to reduced situation awareness and problem-solving abilities, which intern can contribute to accidents. I do not see it as something that safety and health advisor would be responsible for “fixing.” That would be impossible. However they could notice the signs and offer resources. They can also be a source of early prevention by treating people with respect. The main reason I talk about it this way is that many safety and health advisors care about people and want to reduce the suffering. As human beings we can all contribute to reduce suffering.
Hurak Learning says
Being oriented towards psychosocial and mental health in safety is essential for promoting overall well-being and reducing the risk of negative mental health consequences during emergencies or disasters. This includes recognizing the importance of addressing emotional, psychological, and social needs in addition to physical safety. It is important to provide support and resources for those who may be struggling with mental health issues and to create a supportive and inclusive environment. This includes promoting open and honest communication, providing access to mental health resources, and promoting resilience and stress management techniques. By prioritizing psychosocial and mental health in safety, we can ensure that individuals are better equipped to cope with emergencies and disasters and maintain their overall well-being.
Rob long says
And who in safety is qualified and experienced to do this?
Wynand says
I have a daughter who is studying psychology. Even though I always knew it is a complex field, I got quite a surprise to see what is included in the field of study before they are even allowed to do a single consultation. This is a complex and intricate field of study, and even in this discipline some highly qualified people can get it wrong. To assume that anyone can be “trained” in a short course to understand this is absurd. A short course at best can only provide a grasp of how much Safety is not equipped to enter this field at all. This kind of involvement, as you rightly say at the bottom of the blog, can only lead to unimaginable harm for both workers and the company as a whole. (The more I read on psychology, which is not much at the moment, the more I understand how little I know and how ill equipped I am to be involved in any decision making involving psychological issues.)
Rob Long says
Wynand, this direction into Psychosocial health is a clear demonstration of an industry that is ignorant of the complexities of Psychosocial health and arrogant about what it doesn’t know. I have a daughter in Nursing and you simply cannot compare the professionalism of Nursing with the nonsense of safety. No professional would ever refer to psychosocial need as a ‘hazard’. Ah Safety, the industry that adores zero and harms people under its name.