• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Safety Risk .net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

Discover More on this Site

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE RESOURCES
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • PSYCHOLOGY OF SAFETY & RISK
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Covid-19
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Covid-19 Returning to Work Inductions, Transitioning, Safety Start Up and Re Entry Plans
    • Covid-19 Work from Home Safety Checklists and Risk Assessments
    • The Hierarchy of Control and Covid-19
    • Why Safety Loves Covid-19
    • Covid-19, Cricket and Lessons in Safety
    • The Covid-19 Lesson
    • Safety has this Covid-19 thing sorted
    • The Heart of Wisdom at Covid Time
    • How’s the Hot Desking Going Covid?
    • The Semiotics of COVID-19 and the Social Amplification of Risk
    • Working From Home Health and Safety Tips – Covid-19
    • Covid-19 and the Hierarchy of Control
  • Dr Rob Long Posts
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no HIERARCHY of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • Quotes & Slogans
    • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
    • When Slogans Don’t Work
    • 77 OF THE MOST CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
    • 500 BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2020
    • 167 CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Safety Acronyms
    • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
    • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
    • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
    • Safety Slogans List
    • Road Safety Slogans
    • How to write your own safety slogans
    • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
    • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
    • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
    • Safety Slogans for Work

The SEEK Investigations Donut

June 29, 2017 by Admin Leave a Comment

The SEEK Investigations Donut

As a part of the SEEK Investigations Workshop (http://cllr.com.au/product/seek-the-social-psyvhology-of-event-investigations-unit-2/ ) we explore what is missing from contemporary and popular investigations methods. We use the idea of a donut to imagine what is missing from the centre, and use the donut metaphor to explain the gap in thinking between common investigations models (See Figure 3. The SEEK Donut) and a model that includes an understanding of the Social Psychology of Risk.

The following is an outline of what is typically missing from popular investigations programs. None of the factors discussed in this blog are a part of any Work Health and Safety Curriculum (https://safetyrisk.net/isnt-it-time-we-reformed-the-whs-curriculum/ ).

  1. The first and most important thing is to realize is the subjectivity of the investigation method designer. Most investigations methods assume a linear and reductionist worldview, that is, they see the world through a model of mechanics, technics and sequential order. This means that the method of investigation doesn’t really look for disorder, emergence, randomness and evolution in incident development but imposes a mechanistic focus and a ‘first cause’ approach on events. Typically investigations models come out of this paradigm which may make engineers and project managers feel comfortable but ends up making events fit a mechanistic worldview rather than a humanist worldview.
  2. The misunderstanding of culture as just behaviours (what we do around here), leadership or systems is a significant problem for investigators. With such definitions one tends to see only those aspects of culture as influential to actions. In reality, all the elements of the culture cloud (See Figure 1. The Culture Cloud) are essential influences of actions.

Figure 1. The Culture Cloud

 

image

  1. Understanding how values compete is essential in understanding the shaping of decisions in event investigation. The Competing Values Framework (CVF) developed by Cameron and Quinn (https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id…assetKey) is helpful in this regard. The nature of the CVF is also a critical part of the MiProfile Culture Survey tool and helps organisations better understand how values compete and influence decision making. This is illustrated in Figure 2. The Competing Values Framework.

Figure 2. The Competing Values Framework.

clip_image004

  1. An understanding of how trade-offs and by-products work is essential for any investigation. There is no decision that doesn’t include unseen and invisible by-products and trade offs. The idea that people make logical and ‘common sense’ decisions is a nonsense. Incidents are most often caused because what is logical didn’t happen nor is sensemaking held in common. A linear model of causality usually attributes cause that is not actually there and there is rarely any evidence of a causal link. It is most imposed by the method itself.
  • The nature of heuristics in decision making is critical in understanding decisions about risk (https://safetyrisk.net/investigations-and-heuristics/ ). We learn about the importance of heuristics in HB327:2010 Communicating and Consulting About Risk, the Handbook to the Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines AS/NZS ISO 31000: 2009. Most of our decisions are based on the need for efficiency, fast and frugal decision making. We develop this kind of thinking through experience and so most often use heuristic decision making in auto-pilot, through routine, habit, experience and ritual. Often it is a failed heuristic in times of work turbulence that results in an event not some intentional choice to be unsafe. Safety is often not a ‘choice’ you make! We learn about this through the fact that humans have One Brain and Three Minds (1B3M) (https://vimeo.com/106770292, https://vimeo.com/156926212 ). A study of cognitive biases and effects is also important (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases ). A beginning is to understand the nature of the individual and collective unconscious.

  • One Brain Three Minds from Human Dymensions on Vimeo.

    1. It is important to be a critical observer and listener in investigations. This requires an alertness to the influence on language and how discourse creates meaning (semiosis) in organisations and procedures. This involves learning how to be semiotically literate as well as visually and spacially literate. In the workshop we provide tools to assist participants become more spacially and visually literate. In addition it is also helpful to have some training in critical and cultural theory, particularly how power shapes decision making. People are not naturally observant, observation is learned in a similar way to what makes and indigenous tracker more effective in the outback than rationalist detective skills. Skills of differentiation are important but so too is discernment, wisdom and knowing iCues ™.
  • Understanding personality and having skills in Pastoral Care are essential when one rolls up for an investigation. This involves emotional intelligence, training in a personality indicator but also knowing the foundational skills of ‘attending’, reflective listening, open questioning, ‘Unconditional Positive Regard’ and suspending agenda. The basic skills of Helping (see gerard Egan or Edgar Schein) are essential. Whilst it is good to bring in aspects of positive psychology and appreciative enquiry into the investigation, specific skills associated with general Rogerian psychology are needed.

  • The study of semiotics is about how signs systems and symbols have significance. Such simple things as mantras and slogans like zero can create an underlying ideology so that at times of crisis, people make decisions under the unconscious influence of that semiotic. For example, if one counts injury rates and publishes them under the rubric of zero harm, then don’t be surprised if under reporting is a contributing factor to the decision making in an event. The ideology of zero is a dynamic that directly opposes learning.

  • Wicked Problems are problems that are beyond complexity, they are intractable, unsolveable and messy. Understanding the nature of wickedity is essential for an investigator as often is the case, risk is proposed as a simple problem and this creates investigation myopia. One tends to only look for what one can see (information) rather than for what one can’t see (exformation). In this regard it is helpful to understand how the pressure of Cognitive Dissonance affects decision making. When faced with massive pressures to conform and comply, most people will not take an alternative approach.

  • It is essential that the investigator understand the various layers of risk, particularly how risk manifests in Workspace, Headspace and Groupspace ™.

  • What happens in most investigations is an emphasis on the physical space over the dynamics of social psychological factors. In the SEEK Investigations Workshops several tools are learned to help bring these factors into perspective in an investigation.

    When one understands the massive gaps in the SEEK Donut and learns skills in the social psychology of investigation, then one can become a better investigator, a more positive investigator and a more holistic (pun intended) investigator.

    Figure 3. The SEEK Investigations Donut

     

    clip_image006

    Please share our posts

    • Click to print (Opens in new window)
    • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

    Related

    Filed Under: CLLR, Investigation, Robert Long, Social Psychology of Risk Tagged With: investigations, SEEK

    Reader Interactions

    Do you have any thoughts? Please share them below Cancel reply

    Primary Sidebar

    How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

    Visit Count – Started Jan 2015

    • 22,047,349 Visitors

    Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

    Enter your email address and join over 30,000 other discerning safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

    Please take our 2 minute zero survey

    Recent Comments

    • Rob Long on Can’t buy me love
    • Rob Long on The Spirit of Zero
    • Rob Long on The Spirit of Zero
    • Peter Collins on The Spirit of Zero
    • Rob long on The Spirit of Zero
    • Bernard Corden on The Spirit of Zero
    • Bernard Corden on The Fields of Athenry
    • Rob Long on The Tyranny of Time in Risk
    • Bernard Corden on The Tyranny of Time in Risk
    • Bernard Corden on Professional Conferences Are A Sleazy Con

    FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

    Featured Downloads

    • Pre-Purchase-Risk-Assessment-Checklist.pdf (924 downloads)
    • Volunteer-Risk-Assessment-checklist.pdf (787 downloads)
    • Falls-Risk-Assessment-Tool.pdf (2028 downloads)
    • Real Risk by Dr Rob Long (892 downloads)
    • Workplace Checklist Covid-19 (6790 downloads)
    • Too-Much-Safety-eBook-Rev-01.pdf (1490 downloads)
    • National-Emergency-Risk-Assessment-Guidelines.pdf (1267 downloads)
    • Covid-19 Work From Home Safety Checklist (4804 downloads)
    • ABCs Of Heavy Lifting (4840 downloads)
    • Safety-Backronym-Poster.pdf (437 downloads)
    • Achieve A Safe Workplace (4213 downloads)
    • Presenting-Dos-and-Donts.pdf (427 downloads)
    • Telecommuting Safety Checklist (9436 downloads)
    • OHS-Policies-and-Procedures-Manual.doc (6127 downloads)
    • Supervising Children Around Water (7401 downloads)

    Recent Posts

    • Learning to Reject Zero
    • The Cult-ure of Zero
    • Videos on Zero, Grab Your Bucket
    • Can’t buy me love
    • The Spirit of Zero
    • The Tyranny of Time in Risk
    • The ‘Feeling’ and ‘Being’ of Safety
    • Please Don’t Use the ‘F’ Word in Safety
    • The Voodoo of The Hoodoo
    • The Heinrich Hoodoo

    Footer

    AUTHORS

    • Alan Quilley
      • Heinrich–Industrial Accident Prevention
      • The Problem With ZERO Goals and Results
    • Bernard Corden
      • Can’t buy me love
      • Blinded by the Light
    • Bill Sims
      • Employee Engagement: Chocolate, Vanilla, or Strawberry?
      • Injury Hiding-How do you stop it?
    • Craig Clancy
      • Task Based vs Activity Based Safe Work Method Statements
      • Safety And Tender Submissions
    • Daniel Kirk
      • It’s easy being wise after the event.
      • A Positive Safety Story
    • Dave Whitefield
      • Safety is about…
      • Safety and Compliance
    • Dennis Millard
      • Are You Risk Intelligent?
      • Honey they get me! They get me at work!
    • Drewie
      • Downturn Doin’ Your Head In? Let’s Chat….
      • How was your break?
    • Gabrielle Carlton
      • All Care and No Care!
      • You Are Not Alone!
    • George Robotham
      • How to Give an Unforgettable Safety Presentation
      • How To Write a Safety Report
    • Goran Prvulovic
      • Safety Manager – an Ultimate Scapegoat
      • HSE Performance – Back to Basics
    • James Ellis
      • In search of plan B in workers’ recovery
      • What and how should we measure to support recovery from injury?
    • James Parkinson
      • To laugh or not to laugh
      • People and Safety
    • John Toomey
      • Who is Responsible for This?
      • Who Are Your People?
    • Karl Cameron
      • Abby Normal Safety
      • The Right Thing
    • Ken Roberts
      • Safety Legislation Is Our Biggest Accident?
      • HSE Trip Down Memory Lane
    • Mark Perrett
      • Psychology of Persuasion: Top 5 influencing skills for getting what you want
    • Mark Taylor
      • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
      • Enculturing Safety
    • Max Geyer
      • WHS Legislation is NOT about Safety it’s about Culture
      • Due Diligence Is Not Just Ticking Boxes!
    • Matt Thorne
      • It was the SIA until someone wanted to swing from the Chandelier
      • Common Sense is Remarkably Uncommon
    • Peter Ribbe
      • Is there “Common Sense” in safety?
      • Who wants to be a safety professional?
    • Phil LaDuke
      • Professional Conferences Are A Sleazy Con
      • Hey Idiots, You’re Worried About the Wrong Things
    • Admin
      • CLLR Newsletter–April 2021
      • Zero is not a Target or Vision, it’s a Language/Discourse
    • Dr Rob Long
      • Learning to Reject Zero
      • The Cult-ure of Zero
    • Rob Sams
      • I’m just not that into safety anymore
      • Social ‘Resiliencing’
    • Barry Spud
      • Barry Spud’s Hazard Control Tips
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
    • Sheri Suckling
      • How Can I Get the Boss to Listen?
    • Safety Nerd
      • The Block isn’t portraying safety as it should be
      • Toolbox Talk Show–PPE
    • Wynand Serfontein
      • Why The Problem With Learning Is Unlearning
      • I DON’T KNOW
    • Zoe Koskinas
      • Why is fallibility so challenging in the workplace?

    FEATURED POSTS

    Second Group Completes Graduate Certificate in Psychology of Risk

    The Fear of Power and the Power of Fear

    Second Student Group Social Psychology of Risk

    An Introduction to Semiotics and Risk

    Beware of Hazardous ‘OINTMENT’

    The Curse of Behaviourism

    We need to make sure this can never happen again

    Investigations and Truth Telling

    Anchoring Safety to Objects

    Is Choice The First Casualty in the Worker’s Compensation War?

    Daydreaming and Safety

    Why Would You Talk That Way?

    Actions in ‘Bad Faith’

    Emotions, Bias and Heuristics in Risk

    Centre for Leadership and Learning in Risk (CLLR)–Study Calendar

    Towards Dumb

    Question for the Safety Thinkers

    Questioning Skills and Investigations

    Dumb Ways to Discourse, a Failed Approach in Safety

    SEEK Investigations Workshop

    More Posts from this Category

    Paperwork

    https://vimeo.com/162034157?loop=0

    Due Diligence

    https://vimeo.com/162493843?loop=0

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.