• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Safety Risk .net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • PSYCH. OF SAFETY & RISK
    • What is Psychological Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Robert Long
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no HIERARCHY of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • Slogans
    • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
    • When Slogans Don’t Work
    • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
    • BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2022
    • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Safety Acronyms
    • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
    • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
    • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
    • Safety Slogans List
    • Road Safety Slogans 2022
    • How to write your own safety slogans
    • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
    • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
    • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
    • Safety Slogans for Work
  • Safety Culture
    • Safety Culture Silences
  • Psychological Safety
You are here: Home / Psychological Safety / Psychosocial Controls and Measures for Who?

Psychosocial Controls and Measures for Who?

August 2, 2022 by Dr Rob Long Leave a Comment

imageThe fixation and psychosis of the safety industry with ‘controls’ and ‘measures’ creates the delusion that psychosocial issues can be controlled and measured.

When it comes to psychosocial issues, the last thing that helps is quantitative language and simplistic mythology. And the latest Worksafe Code of Practice on Managing Psychosocial Hazards at Work exemplifies the problem.

Download the Code of Practice here: model code of practice – managing psychosocial hazards at work

Let’s start with an easy one, stress (p.6).

‘Stress is the body’s reaction when a worker perceives the demands of their work exceed their ability or resources to cope’.

Just look at the language. Stress is contingent on the perception of the worker who is stressed. Of course, if I ‘feel’ stressed and declare that stress, how will this be measured? How are admissions of stress usually received? When is it ever confessed? Indeed, how will stress be managed to as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). Four subjectivities nicely strung together here: stress, feeling, perception and ALARP. Safety is already out of its depth. There is no discussion on the challenges of subjectivity or bias in this document.

In an industry that adores counting numbers, engineering, blame and bullying, who would ever admit they are suffering from stress? Indeed, with a regulator who adores inquisitions, blitzes and ‘we’ll get you’ rhetoric, who is going to talk to Safety about stress? It’s like R U OK day on steroids. Put out a code without a method and nothing changes.

So, even if a worker approaches management and says they are stressed, are they believed? Not likely, this is Safety. Indeed, with what expertise will a safety person help enact this code of practice with the curriculum and industry infused with Behaviourism? How can the ‘quanta’ of Behaviourism understand the ‘qualia’ of psycho-social need?

I called for curriculum reform in safety 7 year ago (https://safetyrisk.net/isnt-it-time-we-reformed-the-whs-curriculum/ ) and nothing. I guess even if one day there was a review of the WHS curriculum they would get an engineer to do it. Unless Safety moves away from zero ideology, Behaviourism and binary discourse, nothing will improve when it comes to psychological injury.

Indeed, it is well known that BBS and Zero (the love children of Safety) are principle contributors to the dehumanization, brutalism and psychological abuse of persons. Any absolute placed on fallible people can only result in brutalism, such is the vice of zero and an industry with no ethic.

So, whilst it is good to have a code of practice on these matters where is the discussion at the heart of the problem that is: the way the safety industry cultivates psychological and social harm? No mention of such in this document.

When you see humans and speak about people as ‘factors’ or ‘components’ in a system they have already been dehumanized and devalued. When one understands culture as a ‘product’, behaviours or systems, the real underlying problems to do with psychosocial injury will remain untouched.

Naturally, there is no mention of BBS, Zero or dehumanization in this document. This makes it wonderfully aligned with the AIHS BoK Chapter on Ethics that never mentions personhood, power, zero, BBS or a host of unethical things that safety normalizes and adores in its pursuit of counting objects, hazards and controls.

I wonder on what skill base this Code of Practice expects enactment? Into what depths of skill will safety people be able to delve to communicate about mental illness? Considering safety people are given no basic training in communication, listening, engagement, helping or pastoral care, where will a response emerge from?

I was sent this document yesterday from an observer on LinkedIn packaged as a proud descriptor of what safety people do (Figure One. Safety Responsibilities)

Figure One. Safety Responsibilities

clip_image002

Looks very authentic to me and something that could have been taken out of any safety HR document anywhere. Indeed, most in safety would probably agree that this is what Safety does.

The glaring omission is? You guessed it, people. Simple things like care, helping skills (no mention in this document), listening (no mention in this document), understanding, empathy (no mention in this document), counselling etc. all skills necessary in tackling psychological injury, social and mental health issues, crickets! None of this is mentioned across the safety industry, such is its identity and self-understanding.

How is an industry in love with objects ever going to learn how to engage with subjects? How is an industry framed by the love of zero (https://www.humandymensions.com/product/for-the-love-of-zero-free-download/ ), defined by a number, ever going to be able to focus on persons?

There is no compatibility between the ideology of zero and this document on psychosocial issues. Zero begins, ends and is defined by intolerance. The greatest need anyone has with a psychosocial injury is tolerance.

So, put out a Code of Practice but where is the skill development in the WHS curriculum to help safety people enact the demands of this Code?

Where is the understanding of culture needed to enact the concerns of this document?

When Safety is silent (https://safetyrisk.net/category/safety-culture-silences/ ) on so many critical factors in culture, how is it going to evaluate cultural issues that engender psychosocial harm?

What is the point of presenting an industry with a code to be enacted when it has neither the culture, knowledge, curriculum or skills to enact it?

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • How to be a Safety Extremist - August 15, 2022
  • The Safety Spoilsport - August 13, 2022
  • The Safety Worldview and the Worldview of Safety, Testing Due Diligence - August 13, 2022
  • The Enemy of Safety – Humans - August 13, 2022
  • The Sacred Bra Tree - August 7, 2022
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Psychological Safety, Psychosocial Safety, Robert Long Tagged With: AIHS BoK Chapter on Ethics, ALARP, Psychosocial Controls, Stress, worksafe

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,460 other subscribers

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Rob Long on How to be a Safety Extremist
  • Admin on How to be a Safety Extremist
  • Rob Long on How to be a Safety Extremist
  • Rob Long on How to be a Safety Extremist
  • Andrew Floyd on How to be a Safety Extremist
  • grumpy on How to be a Safety Extremist
  • Rob Long on How to be a Safety Extremist
  • Ray on How to be a Safety Extremist
  • Rob Long on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Wynand on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on Culture Silences in Safety – What Culture Isn’t
  • Rob Long on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Rob Long on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Brent Charlton on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Richard Brookes on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Rob Long on The Rhizome as a Learning Model for Risk
  • Ooker on The Rhizome as a Learning Model for Risk
  • Rob Long on Safety Doesn’t Need Military Language
  • Manjit Handa on Safety Doesn’t Need Military Language

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2022
  • Road Safety Slogans 2022
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • 15 Safety Precautions When Working With Electricity
  • What Is Safety?
  • IDEAS FOR SAFETY TOOL BOX TALKS, HARD HAT CHATS and SAFETY MOMENTS
  • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS, CHECKISTS, REGISTERS, TEMPLATES and APPS
  • Free Risk Assessment Template in Excel Format

Recent Posts

  • How to be a Safety Extremist
  • The Safety Spoilsport
  • The Safety Worldview and the Worldview of Safety, Testing Due Diligence
  • The Enemy of Safety – Humans
  • The Sacred Bra Tree
  • Understanding Psychological Terminology
  • Beware False Profits and Messiahs in Safety
  • Risk Boldly
  • Poetics of the Self
  • Culture Silences in Safety – What Culture Isn’t
  • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • When Only More Guilt Will Do
  • How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Keep Counting Every Time You Don’t Achieve Your Goal, That’s Professional
  • Safety and Non-Neuroscience
  • Paperwork and Usability in Tackling Risk
  • Safety as a Masculinist Activity
  • You Don’t Want a Compliance Culture
  • The Soul of Mental Health
  • Identity and Safety
  • Psychosocial Controls and Measures for Who?
  • Linguistics and Safety
  • Not a Profession’s Bootlace
  • Cultural Silences in Safety – Power and Politics
  • History and Safety
  • What is Psychosocial Safety
  • It’s the –ism That Matters
  • A Guide to Psychosocial Safety Skills
  • Doing Away With Health and Safety–Language and People
  • The New Enemy of Safety – The Unconscious
  • Tape Down Those Leads
  • More Safety Code to Disguise Behaviourism
  • Why Safety is Attracted to Behaviourism
  • Safety Culture–Hudson’s Model
  • Understanding Safety as an Archetype
  • The Purpose of Safety
  • Learning Styles Matter
  • Due Diligence and Holistic Ergonomics Workshops
  • Having FUN in Safety FUNdamentalism
  • 80% of Safety Practitioners Are Idiots
  • Risk Homeostasis Theory–Why Safety Initiatives Go Wrong
  • Culture Silences in Safety – Semiotics
  • Flooding is Dangerous, and I don’t Mean the Water….
  • Cultural Silences in Safety – Aesthetics
  • Impacts of Cognitive Dissonance in the Workplace
  • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
  • Risky Conversations, The Law, Social Psychology and Risk
  • Due Diligence Videos – 10000 downloads
  • Release the Safety Monster and Wreck a Good TV Show
  • Paper Safe

FEATURED POSTS

Social Sensemaking–New Book Release

Second Student Group Social Psychology of Risk

No Moral Compass in Zero

Who is the Enemy and What War is Safety Fighting?

Just Tell Your Mind to Stop It

Visual Learning and Envisioning Risk

What Can Halloween tell us About Safety?

Wisdom, Discernment and an Ethic of Safety

The Trajectory of Zero Vision

Like a Collective Brain Snap

Who Gives a Toss?

A Letter To The Editor

Free Two Chapter Download and Book Competition

Acceptable Risk as a Decision Making Process

Incommensurability and Discourse in Risk

Safety is the Wrong Anchor

Turning Neuroscience into Behaviourism

Focus on ‘Meeting’ people, not legislation – a path to risk maturity

Framing Your World

Am I stupid? I didn’t think of that…

The Stanford Experiment and The Social Psychology of Risk

Talking Risk Videos – Humanising Workers Compensation

Risky Conversations, The Law, Social Psychology and Risk

Goals and Vision in Safety

Stop the Train I Want to Get Off

What Can Safety Learn From Desire Paths?

CLLR Christmas 2016 Newsletter and Competition

The Safety Charade as Tokenism in Safety

Why Myths in Safety Work

Don’t Make Safety a Habit

The Convenience of Complacency

What Does Your Risk and Safety Icon Say?

Can There be a Feminist Safety?

Safety Career Highlight

New Social Psychology of Risk Website

The Psychic Effect of Safety

The Human Safety Newsletter is Out

Innocence and Justice in Safety

Free Download – Real Risk – New Book by Dr Robert Long

The Common Sense Fallacy

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,460 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

What is Psychological Safety at Work?