• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • 500 OF THE BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychological Safety
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
    • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
    • What is Psychological Safety?
    • Understanding Psychological Terminology
    • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
    • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
    • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / Robert Long / The Non-Science of Safety Science

The Non-Science of Safety Science

May 30, 2014 by Dr Rob Long 5 Comments

The Non-Science of Safety Science

By Dr Rob Long

We seem to throw words about in the safety community like hoop-la at a school fete.  This not only applies to the use of the word ‘culture’ but also to destructive terminology that undermines the sensibility of understanding risk.  Expressions like ‘common sense’, ‘can do’, ‘zero harm’, ‘be careful’ and ‘get the job done’ are all laden with ill-defined messages that tend to delude the listener into thinking they understand what the communication is about.  As for the sender of the message, when they speak in such words they believe they have actually said something. For example; suggesting that a person use their ‘common sense’ to assess safety is like asking for directions in the bush without a compass.

I conducted the MiProfile survey (http://vimeo.com/24764673) on October 22 2012 for the MBA ACT at the National Convention Centre in Canberra.  The Safety Culture Leadership Forum was a whole day event that commenced early morning, so as to catch a good number of construction workers in the cohort.  The participants in the MiProfile were a representative group of 125 people from all levels of companies (tier 1 to residential, the demographic is explained at the front of the report).  The report presented to the MBA ACT documents the current level of gut knowledge associated with perceptions of safety in the Building and Construction industry.  Some interesting results include: a high level of naivety about safety, the ineffectiveness of the white card, normalized blaming, ignorance of the effect of language on culture and no time for ‘soft skills’ in the industry.  If you would like a copy of the report it can be downloaded here (http://www.humandymensions.com/publications) it is item number 7 titled ‘Safety Culture Leadership Forum Report MBA ACT 22 October 2012).  Many of the findings from this event are confirmed by previous results (from my database over 16,000 building and construction workers MiProfile survey events conducted in the past 5 years).

The MiProfile report from the Safety Leadership Forum confirms that many in that industry have little idea how their language ‘primes’ thinking and behavior.  This brings me to one of the most annoying uses of language in the safety sector and that is the expression ‘safety science’.

The idea that safety is a ‘science’ baffles the imagination.  The idea of ‘science’ (meaning knowledge) originates back to Aristotle’s use of the term ‘knowledge’. Following advances in the 18th century the idea of science was understood to mean ‘reliable knowledge’.  During the 19th Century the word ‘science’ became more associated with the idea of scientific method and the idea of scientific objectivity was held up as some kind of achievable ideal.  The whole idea of certainty was attached to this idea of science until the work of Thomas Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1962) and then the whole idea of scientific objectivity went out the window.  Further work by Popper and Laktos in the 1970s continued to erode the idea of scientific objectivity.  It was finally made clear that Science and Mathematics are a subjective philosophy as much as any social science.  The work of Paul Feyerbend (Against Method 1975 and Science in a Free Society 1978) totally pulled apart the myth of scientific objectivity.  This revolution then brought about the validation of participant observation and the importance of subjective research.  At the same time the work of postmodernists and poststrucuralists further dispensed with the idea of an objective science or an objective scientific method.

When it comes to the measurement of risk we know that the idea of objective assessment is a nonsense.  The idea that a matrix with three elements can be some kind of scientific assessment of risk is so fanciful that it doesn’t really merit discussion.  With over 250 various human cognitive biases, heuristics and social psychological prejudices, a risk matrix is at best a conversational tool. The various matrices and Heinrich-type pyramids about the industry are at best entertainment in the search for objectivity in safety.  The Work Health and Safety Act uses language like ‘as low as reasonably practicable’ (ALARP), surely a statement of subjectivity.  The AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 standard defines risk as ‘the effect of uncertainty on objectives’, further affirmation that the assessment of risk is about the unpredictable, the gambles and luck of humans engaging with risk in their environment in a subjective way.

Whilst the idea of ‘safety science’ may appeal to some it is delusional to think that some kind of objective measure and machine-like method can be applied to human beings.  The more we deny the reality of human subjectivity in risk assessment the more we will believe that systems are the best way to manage safety.  When we believe that humans conform to some kind of Heinrich formula we simply delude ourselves into thinking we can ‘control’ others.

We are now at a saturation point in safety with so much cognitive overload that the excess of safety systems is now driving safety cultural problems such as ‘tick and flick’ and ‘she’ll be right mate’.  Over the last 6 months there have been a number of fatalities and serious injuries in my home town, Canberra.  This is why the MBA conducted the safety Leadership Forum in response to recent events.  Many of the common factors in the recent tragic events were: working alone, a lack of positive supervision, low levels of ‘walking the job’ and little conversation.  When these tragic events occurred all the paper work was complete but no one had talked to the person about what they were thinking about doing.  Then everyone is amazed after the event by the choices made as if everyone is a mind reader.

Unless we believe that human behavior is both unpredictable and uncertain we will continue to walk the path of excessive safety systems and ‘safety science’.

 

 

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • The KISS of Death in Safety - January 31, 2023
  • SPoR, Metanoia and a Podcast on Change with Nippin Anand - January 31, 2023
  • Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health - January 31, 2023
  • The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’ - January 31, 2023
  • SPoR Comes to Vienna June 2023 - January 31, 2023
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Robert Long, Zero Harm Tagged With: can do, common sense, safety science, Zero Harm

Reader Interactions

Do you have any thoughts? Please share them below Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,498 other subscribers

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

SAFETY MYTHS SERIES

The Mythic Symbology of Safety

Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics

Safety Mythbusters

Don’t Be Emotional! Another Safety Myth

Tackling the Challenge of Heuristics in Safety

The Myth of Normal

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Brian on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Jaise on The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Rob Long on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Linda McKendry on Posture Myths and Holistic Ergonomics
  • Rob long on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Matt Thorne on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Anonymous on Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • Jason on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Rob Long on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Admin on How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Rob Long on 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Gustavo Saralegui on 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Rob long on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Wynand on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Rob Long on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • simon cassin on To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Rob Long on Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?
  • Matt Thorne on Free Online Workshops
  • Rob long on No Good Reason to Follow Reason
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on No Good Reason to Follow Reason

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • 500 OF THE BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • Road Safety Slogans 2023
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • 15 Safety Precautions When Working With Electricity
  • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS, CHECKISTS, REGISTERS, TEMPLATES and APPS
  • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
  • The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • NATIONAL SAFETY DAY/WEEK IN INDIA 2023

Recent Posts

  • The KISS of Death in Safety
  • SPoR, Metanoia and a Podcast on Change with Nippin Anand
  • Behavioural Safety is NOT a Foundation for Tackling Psychosocial and Mental Health
  • The Worst Approach to Psychosocial Problems is an Attitude of ‘Fixing’
  • SPoR Comes to Vienna June 2023
  • The Language of ‘Hazards’ and Psychosocial, Mental Health
  • Welcome to the Nightmare, Safety Creates its Own Minefield (as usual)
  • The Visionary Imagination – Louisa Lawson
  • Heaven ‘n Hell and the Safety Religion
  • Confirmity in Conformity
  • Numerology and Psychic Numbing
  • Thinking of Mortality
  • Safety is the Wrong Anchor
  • Foresight Blindness, Hindsight Bias and Risk
  • Getting the Balance Right in Tackling Risk
  • What is SPoR?
  • How Bias Inhibits Learning in Safety
  • Afraid to Let Go of What Doesn’t Work in Safety
  • When You Don’t Know What to do in Safety, Have Another Blitz!!!
  • Gloves and Glasses Compliance
  • A Case of Desensitisation – What Would You Do?
  • How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • The Mythic Symbology of Safety
  • Dark Waters, The True Story of DuPont and Zero
  • 400,000 Free Downloads
  • Am I stupid? I didn’t think of that…
  • Don’t Look Now Safety, Your Metaphor is Showing
  • Ratio Delusions and Heinrich’s Hoax
  • To Err is Human, You Better Believe It
  • Culture as a Wicked Problem, for Safety
  • Safety Leadership Training
  • Cultural Orientation in Risk
  • The Stanford Experiment and The Social Psychology of Risk
  • Objectivity, Audits and Attribution When Calculating Risk
  • Records of safety activities: evidence of safety or non-compliance?
  • Zero, The Seeking of Infinity
  • Safety Leadership Essentials
  • What Can Indiana Jones Tell Us About Culture
  • Safety as a Worldview
  • The Loathing of Limits
  • Culture Cannot be Framed Through Safety
  • Free Online Workshops
  • Safety Culture–Hudson’s Model
  • Book Launch – For the Love of Zero – in Portuguese
  • Advancing Backwards in Safety
  • The ‘Noise’ of Safety, Silence and Practicing of Mindfulness
  • All Things Must Pass in Risk
  • I’m just not that into safety anymore
  • Sticks and Stones and the Nonsense of Zero Harm
  • Courting Infallibility in Safety

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

Why Would You Talk That Way?

Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick

Question for the Safety Thinkers

Deepwater Horizon and The Suppression of Risky Conversations

The Visionary Imagination and Marion Mahoney Griffin

Be Alert, Safety Needs More Lerts

Selective Harm for Rio Tinto

Independent Thinking in an Uncertain World, A Mind of One’s Own

The Learning (and unlearning) that Revealed my Vocation

Look With Your Heart and Not With Your Eyes

Human Factors is Never About Humans

I DON’T KNOW

You Don’t Want a Compliance Culture

The Trajectory of Zero Vision

The Attraction of Simple and Easy in Safety

The Safety Spoilsport

And the Innovation is? More Controls…..

What Can Safety Learn from Barbie

Safety Leadership Training

Safety-1, Safety-2, Safety-3

Safety as Policing

I Have the Power, I’m a Safety Hero

Making Technicians Not Helpers

By What Method Do You Tackle Risk?

Real Risk for Real Life

A Letter To The Editor

Towards Dumb

How to use signs, symbols and text effectively in communicating about risk

Human Dymensions Newsletter September 2016

Face to Face SPoR Workshops 2022

What Are the Benefits Of Social Psychology of Risk?

Desensitization, Statistics and the Psychic Numbing of Numerics

WHS Legislation is NOT about Safety it’s about Culture

Social Sensemaking – Book Launch Dates & Venues Confirmed

Flooding is Dangerous, and I don’t Mean the Water….

The Certainty of Uncertainty

Face-to-Face Safety

It Works! A New Approach to Risk and Safety

Making Language in Safety Meaningful

Certificate, Diploma and Masters Studies in SPoR

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,498 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?