• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Safety Risk .net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE RESOURCES
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • PSYCHOLOGY OF SAFETY & RISK
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Covid-19
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Covid-19 Returning to Work Inductions, Transitioning, Safety Start Up and Re Entry Plans
    • Covid-19 Work from Home Safety Checklists and Risk Assessments
    • The Hierarchy of Control and Covid-19
    • Why Safety Loves Covid-19
    • Covid-19, Cricket and Lessons in Safety
    • The Covid-19 Lesson
    • Safety has this Covid-19 thing sorted
    • The Heart of Wisdom at Covid Time
    • How’s the Hot Desking Going Covid?
    • The Semiotics of COVID-19 and the Social Amplification of Risk
    • Working From Home Health and Safety Tips – Covid-19
    • Covid-19 and the Hierarchy of Control
  • Dr Rob Long Posts
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no HIERARCHY of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • Quotes & Slogans
    • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
    • When Slogans Don’t Work
    • 77 OF THE MOST CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
    • 500 BEST and WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2021
    • 167 CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Safety Acronyms
    • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
    • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
    • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
    • Safety Slogans List
    • Road Safety Slogans
    • How to write your own safety slogans
    • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
    • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
    • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
    • Safety Slogans for Work
You are here: Home / Robert Long / The Delights of the Zero Delusion

The Delights of the Zero Delusion

August 22, 2020 by Dr Rob Long 15 Comments

The Delights of the Zero Delusion

These days it seems one can spread any lie and propaganda and people will be sucked in by it. Why would people rather believe a lie? Because it satisfies their underlying need to be in control (https://psyche.co/ideas/beliefs-have-a-social-purpose-does-this-explain-delusions). All fundamentalisms work this way. The same fear of uncertainty that sweeps dictators to power is the same fear that feeds the zero delusion. And the key to propaganda is the continued repetition of a lie so that it becomes the new truth.

The latest post from the champions of Zero at the ISSA have launched another delusional promo (https://ww1.issa.int/proactive-leading-indicators-launch) and a re-hash of the 7 Golden Rules of zero delusion. Every time the spin and propaganda comes out they just take the industry deeper into the wormhole.

image

Of course you have to package delusion and propaganda in gift wrapping like ‘great success’, ‘remarkable growth’ or ‘everyone is onboard’ but none of this is true. There is no evidence for any ISSA claim. There is no zero, nothing has changed, the emperor has no clothes and the 7 Golden Rules are simply what anyone does in safety (http://visionzero.global/guides ). But hey a golden turd looks good on the outside.

Vision Zero is a propaganda campaign that has been running now for several years hmmm, and has zero been achieved of course not. Vision zero is not a vision. Any mantra that denies the reality of life as fallible can only be a delusion. To be visionary one has to offer something with vision that seeks the best for people and offers hope not wishing, trust not noise and practicality not dreams. There is nothing visionary about setting one’s sights by a number and its outcomes of brutalism and unethical deceit. And of course the AIHS and NSCA are up to their neck in this non-visionary delusion, the binding power of the zero cult.

No-one at a grassroots level believes any of this stuff. Results from the zero survey https://safetyrisk.net/take-the-zero-survey/ demonstrates clearly that no one (97%) in safety believes this zero stuff. Most think that zero is unethical and drives dishonesty, shifting data, underreporting and bullying. There is no more unethical mantra for this industry of policing than zero. But here we are with a few crazies at the top who can’t cope with binary opposition, with no sense of leadership and so the industry ends up with this continued delusion that somehow a number is a vision.

Wouldn’t it be good if the industry has a vision for ‘helping’? Wouldn’t it be great if the industry had a vision for humanizing people? Wouldn’t it be visionary if the industry sought to be caring for people and their wellbeing? Nup, give us propaganda and zero, let’s feed the people golden turds and tell them that it’s good for them.

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • Human Factors is Never About Humans - May 4, 2022
  • Where to Start in Humanising Leadership in Risk - May 4, 2022
  • Safety Silences – Video Series - May 3, 2022
  • What is the Human Body for in Safety? - April 29, 2022
  • You Don’t Fess Up Without Trust - April 27, 2022
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Robert Long, Zero Harm Tagged With: golden rules, zero harm delusion

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Rob long says

    August 30, 2020 at 7:55 AM

    Riskcurious, the idea that the zero ideology might have some rational logical justification doesn’t exist. It’s mostly emotional and doesn’t countenance debate. It’s actually an extremist fundamentalist ideology. So, no granularity. Similarly, there are no publications or research that even try to connect the language of the goal to decisions or behaviours, it’s just an unquestioned ideology and so propagandistic and cultivate. My survey shows clearly that the rank and file of the industry don’t believe it but this is not about evidence or sensemaking. It’s an ideology and needs no evidence and requires no sense making. Just believe!

    Reply
  2. Riskcurious says

    August 29, 2020 at 9:31 PM

    I guess this was why I tried to narrow down to a more specific question. The arguments on both sides often seem often to be unclear about what they are addressing – zero harm as mantra/symbolism, zero harm as a goal/, the existence of stated safety goals/targets at all, the existence of any stated business goals/targets (including safety and other).
    But arguments around “zero” seem to try to be all-encompassing and without some granularity don’t seem to address the problems, dilemmas, tradeoffs associated with each question (nor be explicit around assumptions with respect to wider contexts).
    This more focussed discussion, to me, would be far more interesting and perhaps more insightful. But that’s just me.

    Reply
  3. Rob Long says

    August 29, 2020 at 9:32 AM

    Thanks for the question. I think most people understand the zero discourse as a numeric, a goal or a target but that’s about it. I don’t think many think for a second about zero as a semiotic, semantic or linguistic psychology/discourse. Many don’t even know the difference between discourse and language. Similarly there is little thought for what any of this does to the human unconscious or collective unconscious. and again, I know many in safety don’t believe either, such is the materialist behaviorist ideology of the sector. Somehow people think the language and discourse is neutral and that declaring it an aspiration or something else neutralizes it’s unconscious discourse. Again if you believe in neither, how would you understand my concerns with it.
    One thing is fairly certain whether one agrees with either side, it is the most divisive issue in the sector and those management have no idea how much they alienate the rank and file by their discourse, mythology etc (read Ricoeur/ Foucault).
    I wouldn’t see any difference between the current discourse and zero fatality, it is just the same psychology of goals that is currently being ignored. Once one understands the nature of discourse I would want to know why you have to speak in such a way when we all know how to censor language every day. The industry simply doesn’t know how to be silent about metrics and numerics, objects and behaviorism. At a deeper level the psychosis of perfectionism and the associated discourse of blame can never be avoided if one’s discourse speaks it.
    Not expecting Safety to read Wittgenstein, Lacan, Merleau-Ponty, Derrida, Foucault, Ricoeur, Kristeva, Halliday etc very soon. Even just the slightest examination of the language of safety not even discourse evidences a pretty warped view of what it is to be human.

    Reply
  4. bernardcorden says

    August 29, 2020 at 9:30 AM

    Here is a link to several articles on the Intersafe website, which include some from the late Geoff MacDonald:

    https://www.intersafe.com.au/product-category/papers/

    Reply
  5. Riskcurious says

    August 29, 2020 at 7:41 AM

    I am not familiar with his work but am interested to read – particularly to understand the definitions used and any data on the overlap (or otherwise) between the types of incidents resulting in the two subcategories of Class 1 Damage. Just to clarify, are you referring to articles on here or published? (I am interested in the research bit just did an unsuccessful database search).

    Reply
    • Admin says

      August 29, 2020 at 9:09 AM

      Have a look thru some of the articles here and there may be some links. Unfortunately he passed away before his book was published but there are people trying to get that done

      Reply
  6. Riskcurious says

    August 28, 2020 at 3:39 PM

    I’m possibly not as convinced that the goal is that obvious. Taking COVID 19 as an example, the goal (in terms of deaths) is not obvious without being stated – and it does change the strategy implemented. Most countries have adopted a goal that is not zero fatalities or elimination of the virus (at least for now, with scientific progress or the adaptation of the virus then maybe this will be the aim in the future). There are also plenty of industries/activities where fatalities are accepted (so having a goal of “zero fatalities” would not be obvious).

    And then if the it were obvious that we had a goal of zero fatalities for all pursuits (and all the other obvious goals of making profit etc etc), wouldn’t we just essentially end up with infinite obvious and conflicting goals with no real strategy to put resources into achieving any one of them or any understanding of the goal trade-offs? It would seem weird to keep a goal of (e.g.) x increase in profits (which might also be deemed “obvious”) but then drop other goals for being too obvious.

    This doesn’t mean that I am in a for or against camp, just some of the questions that it brings to mind.

    Reply
    • Admin says

      August 28, 2020 at 4:29 PM

      Did you ever read the work of Geoff McDonald and what he calls “class 1 damage” – engineering focussed but interesting https://safetyrisk.net/safety-myths-and-misconceptions-2/ .

      Perhaps an inconvenient truth but deaths are probably cheaper for governments and underwriters to manage?

      Reply
  7. Riskcurious says

    August 28, 2020 at 11:23 AM

    PS – For the purpose of the question, this is assuming that those creating strategies to achieve goals are not fooled by Heinrich’s Triangle so it doesn’t just turn into a game of suppressing other minor injuries/hazards etc.

    Reply
  8. Riskcurious says

    August 28, 2020 at 11:21 AM

    So I have a genuine question about “zero” goals. I believe that I am pretty across the arguments for and against “zero harm” goals/aspirations etc (and to be honest, with the exception of the discussion on the Safety of Work podcast, I find most rather repetitive and tedious now).

    But through all the debate, I haven’t really come across what proponents from either side think about “zero fatality” goals for very specific events/industries where it may be near to or achievable (e.g. goal of zero fatal regular public transport aircraft crashes for a developed nation airline, goal of zero deaths from starvation in a location in Australia, goal of zero deaths from a specific preventable/treatable disease), or where certain types of deaths may be particularly morally repugnant (e.g. persons murdered by their partners in domestic situations).

    Curious to hear your thoughts.

    Reply
    • Admin says

      August 28, 2020 at 1:27 PM

      I dont get why something so obvious (for many reasons) needs to be even stated formally as a goal – should some things just go without saying? Would our methododolgy be any different if the goal were zero death as opposed to zero harm? Even if we added a more positive and achievable spin like: “provide adequate food supplies and health care to XYZ region”, “identify early signs of domestic violence and implement effective rapid intervention programs”

      Reply
      • Rob Long says

        August 29, 2020 at 9:36 AM

        Dave, the warped sense of goal-mindedness of the industry is an indictment of its self understanding and anthropology. Just do a study of what safety is noisy about and silent about and you will soon realize it’s a sick industry. All LTIs and TRIFR etc and so little goals for wisdom, helping, listening and learning.

        Reply
  9. Rob Long says

    August 24, 2020 at 12:49 PM

    Lindsay what is this propaganda about Covid?

    Reply
  10. Lindsay says

    August 24, 2020 at 6:58 AM

    ‘And the key to propaganda is the continued repetition of a lie so that it becomes the new truth.’ just as governments around the world are feeding us propaganda about covid…

    Reply
  11. bernardcorden says

    August 23, 2020 at 10:26 PM

    “Qu’ils mangent de la brioche” – Marie Antoinette (ChOHSP)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_them_eat_cake

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Visit Count – Started Jan 2015

  • 23,959,606 Visitors

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,416 other subscribers

NEW! Free Download

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Rob Long on Humanising Leadership in Risk, Shifting the Focus from Objects to Persons
  • Owen Hicks on How To Write a Safety Report
  • Rob long on Safety Silences – Video Series
  • Tanha on Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
  • Aneta Parker on Humanising Leadership in Risk, Shifting the Focus from Objects to Persons
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on Safety Silences – Video Series
  • Rob Long on What is the Human Body for in Safety?
  • Baidyanath Bhowmick on Safety Acronyms
  • rlong@internode.on.net on What is the Human Body for in Safety?
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on What is the Human Body for in Safety?

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Featured Downloads

  • WHO Risk Assessment (1020 downloads)
  • Learning-How-to-Facilitate-Learning.docx (3125 downloads)
  • Draft Culture Standard for Construction (249 downloads)
  • Electrical_Equipment_Risk_Assessment_v2.0-1.doc (8888 downloads)
  • OHS-Policies-and-Procedures-Manual.doc (7669 downloads)
  • Coronavirus - Covid 19 Toolbox Talk (6996 downloads)
  • Safety Moment - Bypassing Safety Controls (5106 downloads)
  • Seven-Essential-Safety-Reminders.pdf (1773 downloads)
  • Professional-Challenges-for-the-Safety-Industry (19550 downloads)
  • WHS-Legislation-A-to-Z-2012.doc (58412 downloads)
  • Psychologically Safe and Healthy Workplaces: Risk Management Approach Toolkit (3945 downloads)
  • Due-Diligence-Workshop-Nov-2018.pdf (748 downloads)
  • ABCs Of Heavy Lifting (6498 downloads)
  • Falls-Risk-Assessment-Tool.pdf (3592 downloads)
  • Sample-risk-assessment-form.xls (36160 downloads)

Recent Posts

  • Study Reveals an Unexpected Side Effect of Traffic Safety Messages
  • Human Factors is Never About Humans
  • Where to Start in Humanising Leadership in Risk
  • Humanising Leadership in Risk, Shifting the Focus from Objects to Persons
  • Safety Silences – Video Series
  • What is the Human Body for in Safety?
  • You Don’t Fess Up Without Trust
  • Sense-Making and Decision-Making in Risk
  • Holistic Responses to Mental Health
  • Linguistics, Language and Meaning in Risk

What is Psychological Safety at Work?

Footer

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,416 other subscribers

AUTHORS

  • Alan Quilley
    • Heinrich–Industrial Accident Prevention
    • The Problem With ZERO Goals and Results
  • Bernard Corden
    • After the goldrush
    • The Internationale
  • Bill Sims
    • Employee Engagement: Chocolate, Vanilla, or Strawberry?
    • Injury Hiding-How do you stop it?
  • Craig Clancy
    • Task Based vs Activity Based Safe Work Method Statements
    • Safety And Tender Submissions
  • Daniel Kirk
    • It’s easy being wise after the event.
    • A Positive Safety Story
  • Dave Whitefield
    • Safety is about…
    • Safety and Compliance
  • Dennis Millard
    • Are You Risk Intelligent?
    • Honey they get me! They get me at work!
  • Drewie
    • Downturn Doin’ Your Head In? Let’s Chat….
    • How was your break?
  • Gabrielle Carlton
    • All Care and No Care!
    • You Are Not Alone!
  • George Robotham
    • How to Give an Unforgettable Safety Presentation
    • How To Write a Safety Report
  • Goran Prvulovic
    • Safety Manager – an Ultimate Scapegoat
    • HSE Performance – Back to Basics
  • James Ellis
    • Psychological Core Stability for Wellbeing in Workers Comp
    • In search of plan B in workers’ recovery
  • James Parkinson
    • To laugh or not to laugh
    • People and Safety
  • John Toomey
    • In it for The Long Haul – Making the most of the FIFO Lifestyle
    • Who is Responsible for This?
  • Karl Cameron
    • Abby Normal Safety
    • The Right Thing
  • Ken Roberts
    • Safety Legislation Is Our Biggest Accident?
    • HSE Trip Down Memory Lane
  • Mark Perrett
    • Psychology of Persuasion: Top 5 influencing skills for getting what you want
  • Mark Taylor
    • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
    • Enculturing Safety
  • Max Geyer
    • WHS Legislation is NOT about Safety it’s about Culture
    • Due Diligence Is Not Just Ticking Boxes!
  • Matt Thorne
    • Safety Culture–Hudson’s Model
    • Culture – Edgar Schein
  • Peter Ribbe
    • Is there “Common Sense” in safety?
    • Who wants to be a safety professional?
  • Phil LaDuke
    • Professional Conferences Are A Sleazy Con
    • Hey Idiots, You’re Worried About the Wrong Things
  • Admin
    • Study Reveals an Unexpected Side Effect of Traffic Safety Messages
    • Humanising Leadership in Risk, Shifting the Focus from Objects to Persons
  • Dr Rob Long
    • Human Factors is Never About Humans
    • Where to Start in Humanising Leadership in Risk
  • Rob Sams
    • The Learning (and unlearning) that Revealed my Vocation
    • I’m just not that into safety anymore
  • Barry Spud
    • Things To Consider When Developing And Designing Your Company SWMS
    • Bad Safety Photos
  • Sheri Suckling
    • How Can I Get the Boss to Listen?
  • Simon Cassin
    • Safety values, ideas, behaviours and clothes
  • Safety Nerd
    • The Block isn’t portraying safety as it should be
    • Toolbox Talk Show–PPE
  • Wynand Serfontein
    • Why The Problem With Learning Is Unlearning
    • I DON’T KNOW
  • Zoe Koskinas
    • Why is fallibility so challenging in the workplace?

Most commented on

Forecasting Safety

The Banned Objects Index – A New Development in Safety Culture

The Unconscious and the Soap Dispenser

Dumbs for Safety

The Real Barriers to Safety

Safety as Faith Healing

Who Said We Don’t Need Systems?

Why Safety Controls Don’t Always Work

How to use signs, symbols and text effectively in communicating about risk

Safety Should NOT Be About Safety

FEATURED POSTS

The Emperor has no Clothes – Beyond Behaviour-Based Safety

We need to make sure this can never happen again

The Social Psychology of Risk Event Exploration (Investigation) Knowledge

Anchoring, Framing and Priming Risk

The Illusion Of Hazard Identification

STEM Safety in Drag

How Groupthink Works

The De-Ethicization of the Object in Safety

Blind Faith in Safety

Sensemaking and ‘Hapori’ – Essential for Tackling Risk in New Zealand

A Philosophy of Safety

Perfectionism in Safety and the Denial of Humanity

Free Download – Real Risk – New Book by Dr Robert Long

Paperwork and Usability in Tackling Risk

The Psychology of Blaming in Safety

Centre for Leadership and Learning in Risk (CLLR)–Study Calendar

Investigations and Heuristics

Towards Dumb

Bridging the Disciplines for Better Outcomes

Adverse Events: Eliminate or Anticipate?

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,416 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

 

How To Make Your Own Hand Sanitizer

 

 

How to Make your own Covid-19 Face Mask

 

Covid-19 Returning To Work Safety, Transitioning, Start Up And Re Entry Plans

 

How’s the Hot Desking Going Covid?

imageOne of the benefits of the Covid-19 epidemic is a total rethink about how we live and work (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-28/coronavirus-could-reshape-how-australians-work-forever/12097124 ).

Expertise by Regurgitation and Re-Badging

One of the fascinating things about the Coronavirus pandemic is watching Safety morph into epidemiology expertise. I would like a dollar for every flyer, presentation, podcast, powerpoint, checklist template, toolbox talk and poster set that had jumped into my inbox… Read the rest

The Stress of Stasis

One of the challenging things about the Coronavirus crisis is stasis. For those without work and confined to home, for those in self-isolation, it’s like life is frozen in time. ‘Stay at home’ is the mantra. The trouble is, in… Read the rest

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.