• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Psychosocial Safety
    • Resiliencing
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychosocial Safety
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety
      • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
      • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
      • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
      • What is Psychosocial Safety
      • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
      • What is Psychological Safety?
      • Understanding Psychological Terminology
      • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
      • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
      • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / Robert Long / The Complacency Delusion

The Complacency Delusion

January 4, 2022 by Dr Rob Long 4 Comments

The Complacency Delusion

imageYou’ve got to hand it to Safety, it loves to talk about things it knows little about. Then it spruiks solutions based on ignorance and droves line up for snake oil and a feeding frenzy on dumb packaged as a solution.

A good example of this is a recent, ASSP endorsed publication on complacency (DOWNLOAD HERE) . Goodness me, if you want to feast your eyes on nonsense, just get your teeth into this. If ever there was an unprofessional publication about complacency and habit, this is it. No wonder Safety flocks to this stuff (https://ncc.assp.org/events/the-biological-basis-of-complacency-2/ ) it’s completely delusional and has no connection to reality.

Let’s look at a few basics:

  • How can you possibly discuss the nature of complacency without defining it properly?
  • How can you discuss complacency without any consideration for the human unconscious?
  • How can you discuss the nature of habit without considering the fundamentals of heuristics?
  • How can you separate off the body-mind problem  using simplistic biological bias as if matter is the only reality?
  • How can you gain a better understanding of complacency by shutting out 95% of research on the nature of complacency and habit?
  • Why would you go to a safety source to seek understanding on the complexities of fallible human personhood?
  • The report starts with the pooling of ignorance by asking 132 safety people what they think complacency is about? And this facile research comes up with classic dumb stuff like:
  • Not paying attention (a favourite of Safety it never defines)
  • Not taking risk seriously (only Safety knows best)
  • Overconfidence (never defined)
  • Habit (never defined)
  • Poor training (the solution, more reprogramming)

What wonderful marketing for all the mythologies that plague safety. More simplistic fodder seeking simplistic answers that don’t work.

Then the ‘report’ states:

‘the strong support for different driving conditions reflects that complacency is not a well-defined, understood, or agreed upon problem in the OSH community.’

And what does it do? It defines safety by its undisclosed ethic founded in behaviourism. The whole report is based on an undeclared assumption of what complacency really is.

This is how Safety likes to tackle problems. Like publishing an unethical chapter on ethics (https://safetyrisk.net/the-aihs-bok-and-ethics-check-your-gut/ ) and then declaring it ethical! Oh good, let’s publish a body of non-knowledge on non-ethics, not declare its worldview and make sure we omit any discussion of power, politics, zero and personhood.

So, let’s start with a non-behaviourist definition. Complacency is: ‘the unconscious confidence humans feel through the amplification of heuristics’. Many definitions also use the pejorative word ‘smug’ but this only helps foster arrogance and blaming, foundational causes of fostering the complacency of safety arrogance.

The report sets out the nature of complacency as a ‘brain problem’ how convenient. Typical simplistic Safety, all we have to do now is reprogram that goddam computer and people will be safe. If you want to know anything about complacency the last place to go is consulting a group of safety non-professionals.

Let’s start with the nature of heuristics (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281232107_Heuristics_and_biases_The_science_of_decision-making ). The purpose of heuristics is to allow fallible persons to undertake rapid unconscious actions without thinking. Heuristics are good for social living because they enable efficient action at speed and most of the time they work. The by-product of the effectiveness of heuristics is a mismatch in heuristics that create mistakes, usually by a disconnect between context and action. Heuristics are the hotbed for complacency and yet this report discusses none of it! Then the report frames its discussion by the use of the word ‘scientific’!

The report defines habit as: ‘a physiological phenomenon that takes place inside the brain’ Nothing could be further from the truth. Habits are: ‘embodied heuristics built into a person’s being to facilitate action without thinking’.

When Safety gets concerned about complacency it needs to investigate the way human persons create ecological efficiency in social order. Unless Safety gets beyond this silly materialist/behaviourist stuff and engages in a sophisticated understanding of human Socialitie, it will never understand complacency.

I know, I’ve got a good idea. Let’s imagine there is no human Mind, there is no ‘mental state’. Let’s make the brain a behaviourist machine and fix the inputs to get the right outputs!

Anyone with an ounce of knowledge in neuroscience knows that the whole body is a neurological system. If you want to know about complacency, start with a few of these:

  • Claxton Intelligence in the Flesh
  • Varela The Embodied Mind
  • Fuchs ecology of the brain
  • Ginot The Neuropsychology of the Unconscious
  • Noe Out of our Heads
  • Robinson Out of Our Mind
  • Panksepp Affective Neuroscience
  • Tversky Mind in Motion
  • Durt Embodiment, Enaction and Culture

Hey, but let’s not research get in the way of a good Safety myth.

Of course, we know that it’s not about the brain. When your world falls apart, when relationships crumble, when things go wrong ‘Your Body Keeps the Score’ (Van Der Kolk). How strange that when you see the doctor under stress they don’t put an instrument on your brain, they want to look at your heart and your diet. The integration of head, heart and gut are essential for understanding human persons, interaffectivity and intercorporeality.

The reason why Safety wants such a myth that complacency is a computer problem, is that it enables easy blaming and easy solutions. It also enables systems that maintain a myth that doesn’t work. Safety never talks about worldviews, ethos or ethic, that’s the last thing that needs questioning.

So, in this report we eventually get to a definition of complacency (p.9) that suits the undisclosed non-ethic of the report: ‘complacency is a state of decreased external awareness and sensitivity to hazards caused by the brain’s ability to activate neural pathways that require less PFC activity and executive function’. Of course, complacency is framed by a lack of perception about hazards. Why didn’t I think of that? The report makes no mention of such critical factors as: perception, vision, motivation, risk, learning, social psychology or fallibility.

Just think for a few seconds about how the politics of workplaces shape social habit and form cultural habit. Please don’t discuss reality, just reprogram that brain.

By the time you get to the end of this report you have entered fairy tale land and it all moves to cognitive engagement (not defined). All of this packed as ‘professional’.

The proposed solutions in this report based on a mis-definition of habit and complacency, lead to the old safety favourites, nothing new, nothing different. Nothing essential to managing the nature of heuristics or the challenge of embodied nature of habit is in this report. In the end, it slips back to the old favourite, behaviourism.

So, if you want to know about the wicked problem of complacency, heuristics and habit, don’t read this report, it offers no help for safety.

Here’s a good idea. Why not stop going to safety to seek thinking about problems it knows little about. The last place you are going to find any help on complacency is by asking a safety engineer. Perhaps start reading and researching those with expertise on complacency, habit and the human unconscious, now there’s a good idea. Why not start with the list above?

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • A Conversation About Learning - June 7, 2023
  • Brady Review, Nothing New, No Way Forward – Republished - June 7, 2023
  • Embodied Learning in Risk - June 7, 2023
  • Fake Paperwork Ethics, Spin and The Freedom to Harm - June 3, 2023
  • Stop the Job You Haven’t Done Your ‘Tick & Flick’ - June 2, 2023
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Robert Long Tagged With: ASSP, complacency, heuristics

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. JoDaHo says

    January 6, 2022 at 6:16 AM

    I’m familiar with the paper that you review here. My take from it and what little I have read about heuristics is that complacency is a completely normal thing. The realization that it is so normal should make it less of a factor for an accident/incident. In stead of blaming a worker for not caring enough to pay attention (essentially how complacency is coded for safety), why not design safeguards, systems and procedures so that if a normal thing like complacency happens there will be no ill effects?

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      January 6, 2022 at 7:47 AM

      Yes, the real problem with all of this is that Safety has no interest in tackling the mysteries of the human unconscious. and you can’t use traditional safety thinking of behaviourism and engineering (or Biology) to develop an understanding of human judgement and decision making. You can’t respond to the mysteries of the human unconscious with design of systems and procedures as if a method or formula will do the trick. Promising Nirvana (zero) through biology, behaviourism etc is simply fraudulent. There is globally no Ethic of Personhood in Safety, says it all really.
      Just do a search for any of the associations or safety organisations and look for a discussion on the human or collective unconscious, its not there. Look at the AIHS BoK, there is simply no interest or discussion of it and so its all mechanical, its all brain-centrism, its all behaviourism, all measurement. The last thing Safety wants to discuss is the uncertainty of risk.

      Reply
  2. Admin says

    January 4, 2022 at 9:05 AM

    Great review Rob – so apparently we must encourage repetition but reduce repetitive tasks??? I love the attribution based on a really bad survey of 500 Safety “Professionionals”

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      January 4, 2022 at 9:31 AM

      Admin, there is no such thing as a safety professional. This stuff is evidence of that as is the nonsense non-ethics of the AIHS and its ideology of zero.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Admin Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,525 other subscribers

Recent Comments

  • Rob Long on It is NOT My Responsibility to Keep You Safe
  • Chris. on It is NOT My Responsibility to Keep You Safe
  • Pierre Joubert on Zero Doesn’t Work, Road Fatalities Increase
  • James on We are all equal
  • Rob Long on We are all equal
  • James Parkinson on We are all equal
  • Brent Charlton on What Does Safety Achieve?
  • Admin on We are all equal
  • James Parkinson on We are all equal
  • Rob Long on What Does Safety Achieve?
  • Brent Charlton on We are all equal
  • Brent Charlton on We are all equal
  • Brent Charlton on We are all equal
  • Brent Charlton on What Does Safety Achieve?
  • Simon Cassin on You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time
  • Simon Cassin on You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time
  • Rob Long on You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time
  • Rob Long on You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time
  • Rob Long on You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time
  • Rob Long on You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time

RECOMMENDED READING

viral post – iso 45003 and what it cannot do

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

Psychosocial Safety and Mental Health Series

It is NOT My Responsibility to Keep You Safe

The KISS of Death in Safety

Is Your Safety World Too Small?

You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time

When Safety (Zero) is Abusive

Hands Up the Best Safety Fraud!

Communicating Professionally in Risk

How NOT to be Professional in Safety

How NOT to do Anything About Culture in Building and Construction

Celebrating 60 Years of Lifeline

More Posts from this Category

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • Safety Acronyms
  • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS, CHECKISTS, REGISTERS, TEMPLATES and APPS
  • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
  • What Is Safety?
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Embodied Learning in Risk
  • Road Safety Slogans 2023

Recent Posts

  • A Conversation About Learning
  • Brady Review, Nothing New, No Way Forward – Republished
  • Disrupting the Methodology in Safety?
  • Embodied Learning in Risk
  • Fake Paperwork Ethics, Spin and The Freedom to Harm
  • Stop the Job You Haven’t Done Your ‘Tick & Flick’
  • Culture Silences in Safety – Language
  • When Blame Comes Easy, A Lesson From Job
  • Identity, Regulation and Risk, It’s not Just Worksafe NZ
  • AI and Safety, Brutalism on Steroids
  • Beware of Hazardous ‘OINTMENT’
  • Embodied Risk
  • The Convenience of Complacency
  • Asking Better Questions in Risk
  • SPoR – Positive, Constructive, Practical, Rational, Visual, Verbal, Social, Relational, Person-Centric, Respectful, Ethical and Real
  • History and Hindsight in Safety
  • Process driven or People driven? What’s your Focus?
  • Anchoring, Framing and Priming Risk
  • What’s Your Agenda in Safety?
  • What is a Safety Reset?
  • The Myth of Neuroscience Safety
  • When Safety Delights in ‘I Told You So’!
  • Beware the Cult of Denial
  • My Story is Better than Yours
  • Understanding Safety as a Cultural Reproductive Process
  • The Unconscious and the Soap Dispenser
  • Thinking Outside the Safety Bubble
  • Understanding Language Influencing, A Video
  • Safetie
  • You are NOT the Sum of Safety
  • Update on SPoR in India, Brazil and Europe
  • It is NOT My Responsibility to Keep You Safe
  • Safety at the Margins
  • Research Basics for Safety
  • We Need Communities and They Need Us
  • Researching Within The Safety Echo Chamber
  • Confirmation Bias, Risk and Being Offensive
  • Lemmings for Lemmings in Leadership and Risk
  • Expertise by Regurgitation and Re-Badging
  • Zero Doesn’t Work, Road Fatalities Increase
  • Can There Be Other Valid Worldviews Than Safety?
  • Evaluating Value by the Value of What You Don’t Know
  • Reality vs Theory, The Binary Divide
  • No Paradigm Shift with BBS
  • The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Is Your Safety World Too Small?
  • What Does Safety Achieve?
  • In Praise of Balance in Risk and the Threat of Extremism
  • We are all equal
  • You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

The Common Sense Fallacy

The 5 Ways We Identify Hazards

Human Dymensions Newsletter–October 2014

The Mystery of the Emotions

Holistic Ergonomics

The Illusion Of Hazard Identification

Workshop – Introduction to the Social Psychology of Risk

Calculators, Matrices and Mumbo Jumbo Risk Assessment

Deconstruction and Reconstruction for Safety

Social Sensemaking–New Book Release

Resilience and Safety

How Effective Are Your Conversations About Risk?

Wellness, Mindfulness and Resiliencing in Psychological Safety

The Emperor has no Clothes – Beyond Behaviour-Based Safety

Safety Can’t Control Nature (or People)

There is Another Ethic than Zero Accidents

iCue Listening Engagement Manual

First in Best Dressed for Indoctrination

Understanding Safety as an Archetype

Safety Justifies Anything and Everything

The Dynamics of Dehumanisation

A Culture of Care (and sackings…)

Shock and Fear in Safety

Why Metaphors Matter in Risk

Mental Health, Risk and Safety

Anchoring Safety to Objects

Safety Should NOT Be About Safety

Embracing Diversity & Critical Thinking to Help us ‘Create’?

Online Inductions and Safety Effectiveness

Free Download – Tackling Risk, A Field Guide to Risk and Learning

Out of your (Unconscious) Mind

Accidents Happen Because You Don’t Put Safety First

The Village Effect

The Problem with Zero Harm

Zero ‘Arm

Push or Pull – It’s Not Your Fault – It’s a Norman Door!

All Risk is Subjective

The Acts of God and Act of Humans

Spin, Nonsense Language and Propaganda in Safety

Daydreaming and Safety

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,525 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?


WHAT IS PSYCHOSOCIAL SAFETY

x
x