Safety values, ideas, behaviours and clothes
Safety values, thoughts, ideas and behaviours are a bit like clothes; we all have them, but knowing which to wear, recycle, or ditch is often a challenging decision.
After what has been a tough period for many, now might be the perfect time to open your safety values, thoughts, ideas and behaviour wardrobe and have a good old clear-out. Some of us may bulk buy what’s on special offer or worn by influencers or others but beware. You could be replacing something that works with a newer selection of ill-fitting and inappropriate values, thoughts, ideas and behaviours. Some safety approaches may look great in the packet and appear lovely on others, but they’re just not you. They don’t fit and may even result in an unsightly rash or two.
When we approach a new day or new project, we tend to reach for what is most accessible, what comes readily to mind, which for many is located on the top of the pile. Occasionally we have a cursory root around, but generally, it is the most familiar and immediately available that we choose to wear.
If we examine our wardrobe of safety values, thoughts, ideas and behaviours, we might see a wide selection of items, including:
- Undies which have become a sartorial paradigm. Standard wear they are the base layer for every outfit. When we think it’s time for a change, we often add a splash of colour or a logo to what is essentially the same old, same old with a cherry on top.
- There is the stuff we are always going on about. We publicly laud its virtues but choose not to wear or water down those virtues when they are put under pressure, or we are unlikely to be held responsible for our actions by others.
- Most people own the truly beautiful, but sometimes we confuse these items with others which we merely believe to be great.
- Some have splashed out on expensive, brand spanking new clobber that is still in the packet. It could be brilliant but finding the time to unpack it, remove the pins and iron it never seems to materialise.
- We have all got our basics. They do the job, no fuss, no labels; they just work.
- Many may have the kit, which is worn for the crowd. We don it simply to communicate our preferred or socially acceptable persona.
- There’s the cool stuff, which we are determined to wear. No matter how hot and sweaty we might get, taking it off is not an option.
- Most of us own stuff which is designed to protect us from the elements. It may come with a 100% guaranteed waterproof sticker on it, whilst failing to resist even the lightest of showers and a hood that obscures our view.
- There are items that we don’t know how to wear if we are totally honest. Is it a jacket, or a shirt, which button fastens where? We’re not really sure.
- What about the sensitive stuff? It can only be hand washed and dried on the line. Whilst acknowledging it is both delicate and time-consuming to look after, with the right preparation and care, it will probably work a treat and look amazing on most people irrespective of the occasion.
- There’s team wear, uniforms and stuff adorned with badges.
- Threads that are incompatible with others, might be too tight, full of holes, baggy in the wrong places or are covered in patches. No matter how much we try and kid ourselves and others into believing that they are de-rigour, deep down, we know they suck!
- We have all had and even worn items that look totally different or even become invisible in the cold light of day.
- I don’t know about you? But I’ve got some items that I wear as a means of annoying others.
- Over the last few years, many have been attracted to items covered in gaudy writing. These are the perfect representation of the sartorial zeitgeist. They are both highly fashionable and aspirational. They’re in the magazines, online and heavily promoted by fashionistas at conferences, on podcasts and webinars. They are normally very expensive and, in many cases, fail to deliver what’s on the label.
- There are t-shirts made and sold by sock experts and ties which must be worn if we want to enter a club.
- Items which were perfect whilst pogoing the night away at the Brookfield all those years ago but perhaps less appropriate now, (ahh the memories).
- Outfits that looked good at first but after a few washes quickly become threadbare. (Though I’d never admit it in public).
- And finally, Clobber, which was forced upon us by others. We only keep it on the off chance that the giver pops round one day, but otherwise, it’s never worn and commonly resides in a binbag somewhere out of sight and out of mind.
Some values, thoughts, ideas and beliefs have stood the test of time. They may have gone in and out of fashion or never been the flavour of anybody else’s month. But no matter how frustrated we may be by the dissent of others, shouting them down, misrepresenting their opinions, wearing blinkers or just ignoring them should never be an option. Only by examining our values, ideas, beliefs with the help of mirrors and the opinions of others can we truly evaluate how they feel and look in a different light and from the perspective of others.
Anyway, I’ve got to go now. It is time to get to work on my hat selection.
George Stavrou says
Hi Simon,
Clever use of metaphors!!
Indeed, it pays to so often check if the clothes we wear help our cause or they’re just a fashion statement.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
simon cassin says
Hi George,
Loving the fashion statement comment! Very true.
Thanks George
Rob Long says
Then of course there is Zero, that says it’s got you all covered but it’s just the emperors new clothes.
simon cassin says
Hi Rob, I agree, in the post I mentioned items which may appear to look good in the packet but in the cold light of day are invisible.
I’m hoping to consider Zero from additional and possibly complimentary ethical approaches to ones you have posted. The doctrine of doing and allowing harm provides interesting questions for the concept of Zero. Maybe we could consider that in another post?
Thanks Rob
Rob Long says
Hi Simon, I don’t ‘do or allow’ harm and never state so. A sophisticated approach to harm knows when and how to be silent. The trouble with binary safety is that it knows how to be silent on ethics and power and yet doesn’t know how to be silent about zero. The idea that zero is the only ethical outcome/mantra is premised on a binary idea and ignores all the unethical outcomes by adopting such a position. Even more now that zero is clearly an ideological position and progrssed way betong the idea of being about a number.
Professional people know when to be silent about many things, understand complexity and rarely go for simplistic binary approaches.
Any denial of fallibility can only lead to brutalism.
simon cassin says
Hi Rob,
Thanks for your comment, the point about doing or allowing harm was to highlight an ethical perspective of Zero harm.
The ethical case for or against an argument can benefit from consideration of a variety of approaches. I agree the personhood argument you have put forward does provide a strong case against the ethical standing of the Zero mantra.
Thanks Rob
Rob Long says
Simon, unfortunately ethics needs to take into account the whole person not just some agenda with injury and counting injury. Yes, there are a variety of ethical approaches its just you will never see anyone in safety or zero state what that approach is, which is fundamentally dishonest. The deontological ethic of the AIHS BoK and other safety frameworks or any assumption that humans can be objective and infallible fits that deontological ideology.
There can be no discussion of ethics without a discussion of agency, personhood and power otherwise one is not discussing ethics but systems.
The case for deontological ethic is premised on the delusion of a a common natural and knowable good and the binary opposition logic of demonsising injury and harm as polar and bad.
I can think of many instances where harm is good. eg. hormesis
simon cassin says
Hi Rob, thanks for your comment.
I agree some items become invisible when viewed in the cold light of the day.
That is if ones is prepared to admit that the invisibility exists!
thanks Rob
Rob Long says
I had an engineer once argue with me at Griffith UNi Safety Lab that there was no such thing as the human unconscious.
Admin says
Great stuff – thanks Simon and welcome aboard. I’m currently struggling with what to do with all my old leather jackets – It seems that I am the one who thinks they are cool 😀
simon cassin says
Hi Admin
If you think it’s cool who cares what everyone else thinks. Whereas safety ideas etc does matter they almost always affect more than the person who who has them!