• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Safety Risk .net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • PSYCH. OF SAFETY & RISK
    • What is Psychological Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Robert Long
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no HIERARCHY of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • Slogans
    • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
    • When Slogans Don’t Work
    • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
    • BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2022
    • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Safety Acronyms
    • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
    • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
    • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
    • Safety Slogans List
    • Road Safety Slogans 2022
    • How to write your own safety slogans
    • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
    • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
    • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
    • Safety Slogans for Work
  • Safety Culture
    • Safety Culture Silences
  • Psychological Safety
You are here: Home / Robert Long / Nonsense Curves and Pyramids

Nonsense Curves and Pyramids

November 10, 2014 by Dr Rob Long 13 Comments


Nonsense Curves and Pyramids

imageSafety likes nothing more than curves and pyramids, nothing so exciting as parading out the Bradley Curve or Heinrich’s Pyramid to get the troops excited about failure and loss.

The Bradley Curve was created by DuPont in 1995 to try and benchmark notions of culture and performance in relationship to safety. Like all curves, it is a geometric attempt to plot an organisations journey in safety. The Bradley Curve assumes that high injury rates are due to people not taking responsibility. It is a simplistic understanding of causation and totally ignores many social psychological causes for mistakes.  The Bradley Curve also demonizes natural instincts as if intuition, heuristics and unconscious choice is wrong. Natural instincts are associated with high accident and injury rates and, obviously injury rates are the measure of culture? The curve projects on to humans a behaviourist and individualistic anthropology that doesn’t match reality. The whole measure of determining a safe culture is based on an increase or decrease in injury rates.

The Bradley Curve is also premised on the ideology of zero. As one cruises down the curve in binary bliss, the absence of injury demonstrates ownership and responsibility. In the Bradley Curve safety is manufactured as a mechanistic process, luck is evil and the very denial of zero is determined as an attitude that incidents will happen. In most presentations of the Bradley Curve it is also assumed that the presentation of the curve will motivate people to care about safety. Through a process of observing curves and pyramids, somehow people will be motivated to create a safety culture.

imageIf one looks up the Bradley Curve in Google images one can see the influence this curve has had on the way safety interprets culture and performance. The assumption of connection between injury rates and attitudes is assumed not demonstrated. Of course, if one gets to zero one is deemed ‘world class’, a remarkable achievement that can be just as easily achieved through hiding data and under reporting. What is even more remarkable is the lack of definition of harm and what qualifies as injury. I would have thought one was more world class for admitting that mental health was a form of workplace harm than denying it.

One of the things that is convenient about curves and pyramids is that they are neat and tidy, giving a sense of order and control. What Taleb (2010 The Bed of Procrustes. p. x) calls ‘squeezing life and the world into crisp commoditized ideas, reductive categories, specific vocabularies and prepackaged narratives’. Rather than filling safety training with tidy formulas and pyramids of convenience we should be much more in tune with nature of randomness, resilience and risk. Current texts in WHS proudly parade pyramids, swiss cheese and curves as a source of intelligence about incident investigation, causation and understanding safety. I think Taleb is right in associating the commoditization of safety ideas with Procrustes, chopping off and stretching body parts as seen to ‘backward fit’ the mythology. Even to challenge the curve or pyramid evokes all kinds of defense from those with sunk cost in the game. Even their own statistics don’t match the curve or pyramid. Like finding meaning in the entrails of a goat, the curves and pyramids are defended like sacred objects in the religion of safety fundamentalism. My god, they are even sacralised with predictive value.

The pyramid is a much older creation than the curve but is nonetheless as fixed. Despite all the evidence to show Heinrich’s pyramid as the fictional manufacture of an insurance salesman in 1931, safety defends this myth more than a fundamentalist defends the Bible. There is no ratio to risk, this is why risk is about uncertainty. There is no mathematical construct for randomness, the ‘rain falls on the just and unjust’ the same as the dance of death visits without predictability. This is not to endorse fatalism but rather to say that the manufacture of control, the language of absolutes and the commoditization of risk offers no maturity for people in safety.

What I find most troubling about the fixation with curves, cheese and pyramids is the bizarre notion that these in some way inspire safety? Yet, so little is discussed in the safety world about inspiration, motivation and imagination. So whilst safety accepts the imagination of Bradley and Heinrich it can’t imagine that these are just dated constructs. It can’t imagine a safety without such misguided props and their misdirected focus. It can’t imagine what safety might look like without these superstitious trinkets, to ward off the evil of unpredictability and uncertainty.

There is a way ahead without these, a way that values people more than data, that values engagement more than counting and learning more than risk aversion. The way ahead involves letting myths go and un-learning constructs that commoditize. If you want to find out more about a better way to do risk and safety then check out the post graduate program at ACU or email at admin@humandymensions  for more information.

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • The Enemy of Safety – Humans - August 13, 2022
  • The Sacred Bra Tree - August 7, 2022
  • Understanding Psychological Terminology - August 7, 2022
  • Beware False Profits and Messiahs in Safety - August 7, 2022
  • Risk Boldly - August 7, 2022
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Robert Long, Safety Culture, Simplistic Safety Tagged With: Bradley Curve, duPont, Heinrich’s pyramid, heuristics, pyramids, taleb

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Wynand says

    June 26, 2021 at 11:14 PM

    At least admitting to doing “Safety” due to financial reasons is more honest than most of the other motivations.

    Reply
    • Admin says

      June 27, 2021 at 8:31 AM

      I’ve been in quite a few inductions where they stated up front that it was a waste of time but had to cover themselves – little did they realise that they were simply condemning themselves

      Reply
      • Rob Long says

        June 27, 2021 at 6:13 PM

        Most inductions I have seen and been asked to assess are terrible. All have been full of boring safety mythology, excessive and none of it helpful. Greg Smith would tear it to shreds in court too. So much stuff spewed out in safety is simply not legally required nor defendable in court.

        Reply
  2. Jason says

    June 25, 2021 at 1:40 AM

    Seems like a misunderstanding / semantics issue to me.
    Of course no want wants ‘anyone else to get hurt’ and I can see how this curve might be offensive to people in a workplace that still has a reactive culture because it seems to indicate otherwise. But just by having management push the Bradly Curve almost automatically moves you into the dependent stage that the author seems to be complaining most industries do to pretend they are at near 0.

    I worked at DuPont, and they were clear that this was not BS, but rather a legal issue, and that one was expected to even report paper-cuts as they could become infected and be a liability for the company. This admission kept them from the pitfalls of moral-less companies trying to pretend they have morals and doing ‘safety because it’s the right thing to do’ and into the domain that companies actually care about ‘safety because it’s a finical liability’ and thus was a metric they wanted a true handle on / not something to be buried.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      June 25, 2021 at 8:19 AM

      Meanwhile DuPont knowingly hides the toxification of water and harms tens of thousands of people (https://safetyrisk.net/dark-waters-the-true-story-of-dupont-and-zero/). Even so, the opening comment about semantics is a strange one, issues with semantics are no small issue indeed, being naive about semantics starts wars. So not sure if this opening is somehow trying to dismiss the value of semantics, a sub-set of semiotics/linguistics. Obviously DuPont didn’t think what they said needed to match what they practiced and certainly showed they have no moral or ethical compass.
      As for the semiotics of the curve, it has no substance or evidence to support it. It’s just a model and a flawed one at that, all precipitated on the delusions of human perfectionism and infallibility. It is clear now however based on the evidence that DuPont never gave a shit about zero.

      Reply
    • Admin says

      June 26, 2021 at 7:41 PM

      So Dupont’s priority is the safety of the company?

      Reply
  3. Rob Long says

    August 6, 2020 at 12:31 PM

    Rob, I would be most interested in what you mean by ‘works’?

    Reply
  4. Rob G says

    August 2, 2020 at 3:19 PM

    I cannot agree with the premise here. Having been in engineering for 25 years, the last 15 years in engineering management and having been investigated for a serious harm incident for one of my staff, I can faithfully say that the Bradley Curve does work. Attitude does matter and merely palming things off for psychology, culture and a bunch of other things demonstrates one is not at the end point yet – and that’s OK. Eventually one realises these things need to change too. It takes real humility to accept this and move to the next point on the journey. The company I worked at previously for seven years had to have a death to start the change, but we did get there in the end.

    Reply
  5. Chris Jones says

    April 1, 2020 at 7:48 AM

    Hats off to you, fella! I am a safety professional with 25 years standing with a degree in cognitive ergonomics. Very early in my career I became acquainted with the DuPont ‘way’ of doing things and have found it to be fatuous bullshit. End of…

    Reply
  6. ab says

    February 18, 2020 at 9:00 AM

    In the chemical industry its all about bow ties, LOPA studies etc. Its just a way to mask poor process controls & ‘appear’ to be doing something about it. Yes risk assessment is good, but only if conducted by a highly qualified & technically competent group of professionals. Good design, process controls, equipment & procedures will lead to less accidents, but many risk assessments I’ve seen merely justify the reason for making no improvements (cost cutting).

    Reply
    • Admin says

      February 18, 2020 at 3:58 PM

      Dupont must be doing some soul searching after some of their recent incidents – world class safety?

      Reply
  7. Pasquale Bambaci says

    November 30, 2019 at 9:46 PM

    Being in the mining sector for 8 years, previously owning small enterprises i have come to the understanding for all to achieve a better safety culture and increase in productivity and profitability all have to change in the way we approach our work life , caring for our colleagues creating a culture that has respect for one life a happy workforce is more productive and achieves results in all aspects

    Reply
    • Admin says

      December 1, 2019 at 3:43 PM

      Yes – that methodology certainly works when we are with family or friends – people we truly care about! No silly curves and pyramids required there……

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Rob G Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,464 other subscribers

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Rob Long on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Wynand on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Brian Edwin Darlington on Culture Silences in Safety – What Culture Isn’t
  • Rob Long on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Rob Long on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Brent Charlton on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Richard Brookes on How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Rob Long on The Rhizome as a Learning Model for Risk
  • Ooker on The Rhizome as a Learning Model for Risk
  • Rob Long on Safety Doesn’t Need Military Language
  • Manjit Handa on Safety Doesn’t Need Military Language
  • Rob Long on Why Safety is Attracted to Behaviourism
  • Ricardo Montero on Why Safety is Attracted to Behaviourism
  • Admin on Culture Silences in Safety – Ritual
  • Anonymous on Culture Silences in Safety – Ritual
  • Rob Long on Cultural Silences in Safety – Power and Politics
  • Admin on Cultural Silences in Safety – Power and Politics
  • Rob Long on Doing Away With Health and Safety–Language and People
  • Rob Long on Why Safety is Attracted to Behaviourism

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • The Enemy of Safety – Humans
  • BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2022
  • Road Safety Slogans 2022
  • 15 Safety Precautions When Working With Electricity
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • What Is Safety?
  • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS, CHECKISTS, REGISTERS, TEMPLATES and APPS
  • Free Risk Assessment Template in Excel Format
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat

Recent Posts

  • The Enemy of Safety – Humans
  • The Sacred Bra Tree
  • A Small Change and ‘Y’ it Matters?
  • Understanding Psychological Terminology
  • Beware False Profits and Messiahs in Safety
  • Risk Boldly
  • Poetics of the Self
  • Culture Silences in Safety – What Culture Isn’t
  • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • When Only More Guilt Will Do
  • How to Leave the Safety Industry
  • Keep Counting Every Time You Don’t Achieve Your Goal, That’s Professional
  • Safety and Non-Neuroscience
  • Paperwork and Usability in Tackling Risk
  • Safety as a Masculinist Activity
  • You Don’t Want a Compliance Culture
  • The Soul of Mental Health
  • Identity and Safety
  • Psychosocial Controls and Measures for Who?
  • Linguistics and Safety
  • Not a Profession’s Bootlace
  • Cultural Silences in Safety – Power and Politics
  • History and Safety
  • What is Psychosocial Safety
  • It’s the –ism That Matters
  • A Guide to Psychosocial Safety Skills
  • Doing Away With Health and Safety–Language and People
  • The New Enemy of Safety – The Unconscious
  • Tape Down Those Leads
  • More Safety Code to Disguise Behaviourism
  • Why Safety is Attracted to Behaviourism
  • Safety Culture–Hudson’s Model
  • Understanding Safety as an Archetype
  • The Purpose of Safety
  • Learning Styles Matter
  • Due Diligence and Holistic Ergonomics Workshops
  • Having FUN in Safety FUNdamentalism
  • 80% of Safety Practitioners Are Idiots
  • Risk Homeostasis Theory–Why Safety Initiatives Go Wrong
  • Culture Silences in Safety – Semiotics
  • Flooding is Dangerous, and I don’t Mean the Water….
  • Cultural Silences in Safety – Aesthetics
  • Impacts of Cognitive Dissonance in the Workplace
  • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
  • Risky Conversations, The Law, Social Psychology and Risk
  • Due Diligence Videos – 10000 downloads
  • Release the Safety Monster and Wreck a Good TV Show
  • Paper Safe
  • Safety Starts with Us
  • Investigations and Heuristics

FEATURED POSTS

The Colour of Safety

The ‘Noise’ of Safety, Silence and Practicing of Mindfulness

Critical Thinking At Risk

Shopping for Safety

How Groupthink Works

7 Incredible Ways To Diagnose Risk More Effectively

The Disembodied Human and Persons in Safety

The Ethics of Safety

Subjecting and Objecting About Risk

The New Enemy of Safety – The Unconscious

Visualising Risk

The Challenge of the Consciousness Taboo

Off to a Flying Start in Learning with CLLR

Risk vs Hazard vs Safety

Symbols Have Power

Risk and Safety Starts with Being?

Zero Discourse as Gobbledygook

The Intelligence of the Emotions

Acceptable Risk as a Decision Making Process

Understanding Risk

Managing Risk Rather Than Striving for Absolute Safety

Process driven or People driven? What’s your Focus?

Just Hangin’ Out…

Are You a Safety Fool?

Just Tell Your Mind to Stop It

Words Can Change Your Brain

Expecting the Unexpected

Framing Your World

The Idealization of Humans and The Zero Delusion

Looking Forward, Looking Back

A Parallel Universe in Safety

No Gurus, No Stars, No Heroes Needed in Safety

The De-Ethicization of the Object in Safety

Next Free Online Studies Introduction to Social Psychology of Risk

The Tyranny of Absolutes

The Curse of Dataism

The Immediacy of Zero

What or Who Is Safety?

SPoR Quarterly Newsletter September 2021

How Risky is Your Safety Spin?

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,464 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

What is Psychological Safety at Work?