• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • BIGGEST COLLECTION of WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Psychosocial Safety
    • Resiliencing
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychosocial Safety
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety
      • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
      • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
      • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
      • What is Psychosocial Safety
      • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
      • What is Psychological Safety?
      • Understanding Psychological Terminology
      • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
      • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
      • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / CLLR / Implications of Fatigue and Distraction Monitoring Systems

Implications of Fatigue and Distraction Monitoring Systems

April 16, 2019 by Admin 8 Comments

Implications of Fatigue and Distraction Monitoring Systems

Guest Post by Danny Fay

As part of my Unit 6 studies for the Diploma in Social Psychology of Risk, I am undertaking the subject of Holistic Ergonomics.  For my assignment in this unit, I have chosen to evaluate the introduction of Fatigue and Distraction Monitoring systems into mobile equipment by looking at the implications of the system on the human operators.

imageTechnologies for fatigue detection and monitoring have been increasing, and appear to be focused on a reductionist or mechanistic understanding of human beings, where physiological or performance-related indicators, such as eye and head movements are used for predicting and controlling fatigue. This approach reduces the human to an extension of the equipment they are operating and overlooks any opportunity to understanding personhood and the complex; even “Wicked”, problem that is fatigue. If an ideal solution to fatigue management existed, it must be a holistic balance, considering the person as social and fallible, rather than a collection of body movements. Although monitoring technology may have a role in tackling fatigue, It would be helpful to understand and manage the issue from a social-psychological approach before it manifests itself through impaired performance that requires a monitoring system.

Activity measurement has its roots in Frederick Taylor’s Scientific Management Theory or Taylorism. Taylorism’s main objective was the optimisation of efficiency and productivity. Essentially, the human is to be treated as part of the machine, where all movements are analysed, measured and standardised to best practice. There is no understanding of personhood in Fatigue Monitoring systems, we are the sum of the individual movements our body makes and there is to be only one best way of achieving an outcome based on these measured movements. Fallibility is seen as something that needs to be managed, the human is the biggest threat to absolute efficiency. Every blink, face and head movement is captured and analysed against an algorithm that determines efficiency. The human operator is merged with the machine and is monitored in the same way tyre pressure or engine performance is monitored. The desire for ultimate efficiency remains and this desire has unintended effects on personhood and what it means to be human.

Jacques Ellul a French philosopher and sociologist wrote extensively about the desire for ultimate efficiency or “Technique” and how the relationship between technology and man or “the technological system” isolates man from nature, alienates us, and shapes society. Technique and technology are not the same. The role of Technique is to clarify, arrange, rationalise and create ultimate efficiency. Technology, then, is but an expression and by-product of the underlying reliance on Technique, whereby everything is organised and managed to function most efficiently, and directed toward the most expedient end of the highest productivity. Ellul’s issue was not specifically with technological machines but with a society necessarily caught up in efficient methodological Techniques. Ellul argues that a certain level of autonomy is essential for an ethical employment relationship, where a respect for autonomy implies recognition of employees as people, rather than simply productivity inputs. Technique denies autonomy in humans, as we become subservient to the quest for ultimate efficiency. One of the by-products of a loss of autonomy is the alienation of humans.

Karl Marx’s theory of Alienation has a view that individuals lose the ability to determine their own life and destiny. They are alienated from their true inner self, desires, and the pursuit of happiness by the demands placed on them by the socio-economic structure and by their conversion into an object by the capitalist mode of production, which views and treats them, not as human subjects, but as replaceable elements of a system of production. In applying the theory of alienation, it could be suggested that the use of a technological system takes what Karl Marx called “the commodity of human labour to an extreme”. Without understanding the context by which the system is being introduced, the monitoring of people in the workplace could be viewed as treating humans as machines where performance is being maximised and the by-product is dehumanising the person.

The myth from the implementation of these technologies is that fatigue is solved and incidents are prevented, but the discourse is dehumanising, humans cannot be understood or treated as objects or machines with the trajectory of alienation, cynicism and mistrust. When fatigue is viewed as an objective and purely scientific phenomenon and humans are reduced to body movements and data points, we are trading off our personhood and perceiving the fallible human as the problem, generating a trajectory of punishment. Paradoxically, the by products of a methodology that views humans as the problem can result in increased anxiety and stress, and a decrease in motivation and job satisfaction, potentially increasing the risk of fatigue.

When tackling the issue of fatigue, technology has a part to play. Given the complexity of the by-products of using Fatigue and Distraction Monitoring systems, it is critical that such monitoring is guided by ethical principles to consider the negative social consequences and the limitations of using this kind of technology. A holistic approach goes beyond the reductionist and Taylorist view that efficiency is king and fatigue is an individual’s problem, and would apply social-psychological methodology to the issue; giving a richer and more balanced understanding to the problem of fatigue. A holistic solution would integrate numerous elements and address different facets of the issue beyond the view that fatigue is just an individual’s problem, such as looking at patterns of work, rosters, rest breaks, monotony of work, hydration, education, a just culture and ability to self-report or raise concerns without fear of standing out. Maybe fatigue will start to make sense if we consider a holistic understanding of personhood, decision-making and risk.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: CLLR, Road Safety Tagged With: Distraction, fatigue, holistic ergonomics

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. bernardcorden says

    April 20, 2019 at 3:18 PM

    The lumpenproletariat are glued to smartphones as they negotiate traffic but try calling a number and it invariably diverts to a message bank.

    Reply
  2. Rob Long says

    April 19, 2019 at 7:58 AM

    Narelle, Safety has a long way to go before it even gets close to an holistic mindset. Just loook and listen to the lack of vision and insight at safety conferences and you might wonder why anyone goes. All cognitvist and behaviourist stuff from the dark ages.

    Reply
  3. Narelle Stoll says

    April 18, 2019 at 12:08 PM

    Good article Danny and really highlights why a holistic approach is needed. Particularly how work is arranged and structured to minimize fatigue. Such as allowing for changes in work routine, regular breaks, opportunity for proper rehydration and proper management of health and psychological factors that may contribute to fatigue such as illness, personal stress etc. Which is not solved or addressed in taking a mechanistic approach. .I currently work in the Home and Disability Sector where fatigue is an issue given the nature of work isolation, exposure to occupational violence and the repetitive nature of the work undertaken. Unfortunately very little work has been done in this space in terms of identifying ideal work conditions and structure. it seems that the common approach sadly is to apply technology, which in my view may track fatigue but does very little to prevent it.

    Reply
  4. bernardcorden says

    April 18, 2019 at 9:50 AM

    Often disguised as human factors but scratch the scab and the black box psychology with its festering pus of behaviour based safety and pejorative militaristic descriptors such as line of fire, eyes on path, eyes on task, situational awareness comes oozing out as it blames the victim on the carousel of culpability.

    It was promoted in the oil and gas sector via the Keil Centre and has infiltrated IOSH via Loughborough University as Occidental Petroleum and BP protect their corporate image following the Piper Alpha and Deepwater Horizon disasters.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      April 19, 2019 at 8:02 AM

      Bernard, there’s plenty of branding that masks behaviourism in the sector. Scratch the surface and you’ll find the old culprits of individualist blame and political ignorance. Indeed, any recognition of political/ethical forces at work in safety that legitimizes the ‘Freedom to Harm’ is quickly criticised as being critical of safety people. The personalisation of the occupation of safety is part of the strategy of invoking neutral innocence and therefore in action ethically and politically.

      Reply
  5. Rob long says

    April 18, 2019 at 6:20 AM

    Suzanne, the current approach to ergonomics is mechanistic and reductionist. Humans are understood as objects in a system. What is missing is all we know about humans as embodied and social beings. A long way to go before this industry has any sense of holism in practice.

    Reply
  6. Suzanne Jackson says

    April 18, 2019 at 3:10 AM

    I love this article. As an Ergonomist I can tell you that the focus is on how technology can improve people. Aside from helping those with disabilities and disease, when it is applied in the workplace in a Tayloristic fashion it is dehumanizing. But our Forest industry revels in it. Of course to work in Forestry you have to work 12 hour shifts of monotonous work that starts at 4 am. But we don’t talk about that. I am working right now to prevent telemetry systems from being installed in a small local government fleet. Yet my opponents are preachers of efficiency and claiming it will help employees.

    Reply
  7. Rob Long says

    April 16, 2019 at 7:57 PM

    A good piece Danny, presenting the problems with technique and dehumanising people through naive goals and motives but with destructive outcomes. The reductionist, cognitvist and behaviourist ideologies that dominate safety lead to this destructive mechanistic approach and humans become collateral damage.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Rob LongCancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,512 other subscribers.

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Recent Comments

  • Rob Long on Hopkins-Dekker on Reason and Other Laughs
  • Matt Thorne on Myth Making and Why it Matters to Safety
  • Rob Long on What’s Funny About Safety?
  • Rob Long on Perfection is Safety Child’s Play
  • Rosa Carrillo on Hopkins-Dekker on Reason and Other Laughs
  • Brent Charlton on Perfection is Safety Child’s Play
  • Anonymous on What’s Funny About Safety?
  • Rob Long on Zero Hour part 6 Knowing Yourself
  • Rob Long on Safety Cops and Safety’s Adoration of Power
  • Rob Long on Book Launch – “Zero, The Great Safety Delusion” – Free Download
  • Rob long on Don’t Be Dumb Like Me, the Typical Safety Keynote
  • Anonymous on Don’t Be Dumb Like Me, the Typical Safety Keynote
  • Joseph D Zinobile on Book Launch – “Zero, The Great Safety Delusion” – Free Download
  • Jason Martell on Safety Cops and Safety’s Adoration of Power
  • Rob Long on Safety Cops and Safety’s Adoration of Power
  • Peter Collins on Safety Cops and Safety’s Adoration of Power
  • Rob Long on Zero Hour Part 4 – Zero and the Unconscious
  • Chiara on Zero Hour Part 4 – Zero and the Unconscious
  • Rob Long on Zero Hour Part 4 – Zero and the Unconscious
  • Yasmin Saunders on Zero Hour Part 4 – Zero and the Unconscious

RECOMMENDED READING

viral post – iso 45003 and what it cannot do

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

Psychosocial Safety and Mental Health Series

If You Can’t Manage Fallibility, You’ll Never Tackle Psychosocial Health

Embodiment, Myth and Psychosocial Risk

7 Golden Rules that are NOT Golden

Why Zero Vision Can Never Tackle Mental Health

If Psychosocial Health Matters, Stop Hot Desking

Effective Strategies in Mental Health at Work

CLLR Newsletter July 2023

Playing With Mental Health in Safety is Dangerous

STOP ‘BREAKING’ PEOPLE! The notion of Psychological Safety

Learning to Learn Socially

More Posts from this Category

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Footer

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • BIGGEST COLLECTION of WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • Road Safety Slogans 2023
  • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS, CHECKISTS, REGISTERS, TEMPLATES and APPS
  • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
  • Icebreakers and Games that Safety Trainers Play
  • Safety Acronyms
  • What Is Safety?
  • Embodied Enactivity in Safety

Recent Posts

  • If You Can’t Manage Fallibility, You’ll Never Tackle Psychosocial Health
  • Embodiment, Myth and Psychosocial Risk
  • Embodied Enactivity in Safety
  • The Meaning of Myth in Risk
  • Myth Making and Why it Matters to Safety
  • Icebreakers and Games that Safety Trainers Play
  • The Power of Safety Myths
  • What Do You Mean By Performance?
  • Hopkins-Dekker on Reason and Other Laughs
  • Perfection is Safety Child’s Play
  • Podcast – Dr Rob Long With John Morlan and The Risk Matrix
  • What’s Funny About Safety?
  • Zero Hour part 6 Knowing Yourself
  • Free Videos, Podcasts and Books on Zero
  • Don’t Be Dumb Like Me, the Typical Safety Keynote
  • If You’re Happy in Safety, Clap Your Hands
  • Safety Cops and Safety’s Adoration of Power
  • Zero Hour Part 5 – Surfacing the Unconscious
  • Zero Hour Part 4 – Zero and the Unconscious
  • Auditing the 7 Golden Rules of Zero, A Miserable Fail
  • 7 Golden Rules that are NOT Golden
  • The Non-Golden Rules for Leadership in Zero
  • Seven ‘Golden’ Rules for Zero and Yet No Ethic
  • Why Zero Vision Can Never Tackle Mental Health
  • Is this Your Safety?
  • SPoR Workshops Canberra 18-21 September
  • The Dominance of Zero as the ‘Common Denominator’ of Safety
  • Zero Hour Episode 3
  • Goal Setting and Zero
  • Zero as a Worldview
  • If Psychosocial Health Matters, Stop Hot Desking
  • Book Launch – “Zero, The Great Safety Delusion” – Free Download
  • Breach of Faith and Psycho-Social Risk
  • Zero Harm is Never Zero Harm
  • Why Would You Want to be a Safety “Geek’ or Hero?
  • The Mental Illness of Identifying as Safety
  • Zero Hour – Zero as a place holder
  • Zero Hour – Zero as a Philosophy
  • CARING ABOUT PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY
  • Care is NOT a Factor and Yes, Your Model Matters
  • Care Ethics and the Ethics of Care, in Risk
  • FEAR AND CONTROL – Dialogue in a technological society
  • Of Course, Method Matters in Safety
  • Day 12 SPoR in Europe
  • Free Study Module Following-Leading in Risk August-September
  • Effective Strategies in Mental Health at Work
  • CLLR Newsletter July 2023
  • Playing With Mental Health in Safety is Dangerous
  • The Sacred and Profane, Rituals and Semiotics, A Lesson for Safety
  • Day 11 SPoR in Europe

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

The Seduction to Simplify Safety

The Heart of Wisdom at Covid Time

The Visionary Imagination and Marion Mahoney Griffin

Training Workshops CLLR April to July 2020

The Tension of Opposites and Binaries in Risk

OMG – Big Words and Safety

The Disembodied Human and Persons in Safety

Safety as Avoidance

An Ethical Psychology of Risk

Social Psychology of Risk – Body of Knowledge

Next Free Online Studies Introduction to Social Psychology of Risk

Daydreaming and Safety

Day 9 SPoR in Europe

More Realistic Swiss Cheese Symbol

Ten Secrets to Risk and Safety Motivation and Ownership

Essential Preparation for a Safety Job

Auditing the 7 Golden Rules of Zero, A Miserable Fail

Goals and Vision in Safety

Rhythms, Musicophilia and Safety

What is Critical Listening when Dealing with Risk?

Understanding Safety as an Archetype

Don’t Dare Speak the ‘f’ Word

All You Love is Need

The Rational, aRational and Irrational in Safety

Body Memory and Safety

In Honour of George Robotham and Geoff McDonald

Is Risk and Safety Perfectionism a Disorder?

Reflections of a ‘Doer’

Counter Intuitive Safety

Deepwater Horizon and The Suppression of Risky Conversations

Censorship in Safety

New Video Available – Semiotics Walk Workshop

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF RISK – INTRODUCTION WORKSHOP

Three Cheers for the Safety Literalists

Practical Case Studies in SPoR Presented at Vienna Workshops

A Critique of Pure Reason

Humanising Safety Free Virtual Conference

Safety-as-Persona

Why Would You Talk That Way?

The Mystery and Paradox of Being an Individual in a Social World

More Posts from this Category

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,512 other subscribers.

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?


WHAT IS PSYCHOSOCIAL SAFETY