• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Safety Risk .net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE RESOURCES
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • PSYCH. OF SAFETY & RISK
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Robert Long
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no HIERARCHY of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • Quotes & Slogans
    • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
    • When Slogans Don’t Work
    • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
    • BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2022
    • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Safety Acronyms
    • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
    • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
    • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
    • Safety Slogans List
    • Road Safety Slogans 2022
    • How to write your own safety slogans
    • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
    • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
    • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
    • Safety Slogans for Work
  • Safety Culture
    • Safety Culture Silences
You are here: Home / Robert Long / Embodiment, Risk and Safety

Embodiment, Risk and Safety

February 25, 2019 by Dr Rob Long 5 Comments

Embodiment, Risk and Safety

One of the greatest impediments to an envisioned understanding of risk and safety is how these industries define the human person and culture. The idea that the fallible human is divided between a body and a brain completely distorts all strategy in risk and safety.

The problem of consciousness and of knowing in risk can never be properly tackled as long as the human mind and life, brain and body, environment and inner self, are conceptualized in such a way that they exclude each other. As long as the risk and safety industries remain anchored to behaviourist/cognitivist paradigms all solutions and strategy will fail to respond holistically to humans as socially embodied persons.

The traditional response in the risk and safety industries to the problem of harm and injury has always been focused as a brain-environment problem. Whilst the industry has worked over history in shaping a safer environment, it still doesn’t understand how embodied fallible humans respond to that environment.

The focus on human judgment and decision making in risk and safety training has always found its locus in the brain and systems. Indeed, in the language of the industry ‘the brain’ and ‘mind’ are used interchangeably as if they are the same thing. And so, the language of risk and safety is primarily mechanistic focused on the brain as an interpreter of systems.

If one understands humans as embodied then consciousness doesn’t stop at the skin. Indeed, we all know how tools become part of ‘our’ hand, we can feel things through the tool. Similarly when we drive a car, we feel every bump on the road as if the car is a part of us and we are a part of it. As living bodies we extend into the world and the world affects us. Moreso, the discovery of ‘canonical neurons’ in the premotor cortex in the 1990s helps us understand our own agency in the world and how we ‘feel’ a part of it. Our environment ‘thinks’ and ‘feels’ just as much as we do.

The model of the brain as a computer ‘driving’ the body, is simply not supported by the evidence. The idea of ‘reprogramming’ the brain approach has little chance of making much difference to the practice of risk and safety.

The brain does not create the Mind. If humans are ‘embodied’ then the brain is not the organ of creation or instigation but rather a relational organ that ‘mediates’ our living in the world.  As Claxton (2015, Intelligence in the Flesh) notes: ‘the brain does not issue commands but rather hosts conversations’. Claxton (The Wyaward Mind) ought to be foundational reading for all risk and safety people.

What are the implications of human embodiment for risk and safety?

  1. Risk and safety must be viewed much more as a socially enacted process. Where all factors, not just process, human and technique are viewed as interconnected and ecological.
  2. The idea of complacency (The Wayward Mind) must not be viewed as just a brain problem. If the Mind is an integrated whole then everything should have significance in tackling risk.
  3. If humans are not conscious of many things but ‘repress’ aspects of themselves even to themselves, then social presence much be given much more importance in knowing oneself in context and in tackling risk.
  4. As social and ecological communicators then all symbols and language should be given much more significance in an industry that prides itself on speaking nonsense to people.
  5. Moreso, issues of Mind, psychological health and well-being must be viewed as a social challenge not just an individual challenge. This means then that resilience is not an individual problem but a social problem. We have to stop viewing it as ‘pulling oneself up by the bootlaces’ but resilience as the holistic and ecological challenge that it is.
  6. This means that disciplines that risk and safety reject must find a voice inside the mechanistic monster that has been closed by a history of STEM-only thinking. If risk and safety are to have any vision, it can only come from a transdisciplinary opening up to more imaginative possibilities beyond the confines of behaviorism, scientism and cognitvism. This means that such interests an anthropology, social psychology, education and learning, pastoral care, ethics and semiotics should be included in the curriculum. The current 80% focus in curriculum on regulation and legislation should be cut to 20%.
  7. An awareness of what is unconscious should therefore become of interest to the risk and safety industries. This includes the human and ‘collective unconscious’.
  8. The mechanistic and dehumanizing (https://safetyrisk.net/the-mechanistic-worldview-and-the-dehumanisation-of-risk/) trajectory of excessive systems and excessive objectifying must stop and a new vision for risk and safety should be countenanced as an ecological process.
  9. Training should therefore shift from a training room focus to an embodied process in situ, where implicit knowledge receives greater value and heuristics are taken seriously.
  10. If leadership is about vision then the current approach on meaningless data, language and symbology must be dropped and a new narrative created in how tackling risk and safety is practiced.

To take up any of these challenges would require a real sense of vision and change. We hear all this tokenistic talk about ‘disruption’ in risk and safety whilst at the same time building the fortress for ‘non-change’ and comfort in what we know. The industry asks the question ‘where to next?’ but doesn’t want to engage with little else outside the comforts of its own paradigm. And so, nothing will change.

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • Safety Silences in Culture – Affordances - July 4, 2022
  • Safety Silences in Culture – Personhood - July 3, 2022
  • Face to Face SPoR Workshops 2022 - July 3, 2022
  • No Secrets and the Professionalisation of Safety Knowledge - July 2, 2022
  • Culture Silence in Safety – Cultural Capital - June 30, 2022
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Robert Long, Social Psychology of Risk Tagged With: embodimnet, symbology

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Rob Long says

    March 10, 2019 at 4:27 PM

    Unfortunately Kevin, neither risk nor safety are simple, nor black and white. Hardly overthinking the problem of consciousness at all indeed, perhaps you could describe what consciousness is and how the unconscious functions? Especially, how people make decisions in the face of uncertainty? Perhaps under automaticity? Even more, perhaps an explanation on what shame is or why people blush when embarrassed. All with huge implications for learning and tackling risk.

    Reply
  2. Kevin A. Moore says

    March 10, 2019 at 2:30 PM

    That is a lot of words! Over-thinkin the concept. Risk is simply any thing that may affect or safety and property to any degree of concern. I mean anything external or internal to us.

    Reply
  3. Rob long says

    February 25, 2019 at 8:28 PM

    When you are bogged down in regulation and hold an inquiry, you will always seek a future in more regulation. That’s the Safety way. The best way to ensure that nothing changes and Real Risk is denied is to keep the the same worldview and hope that vision will arrive in the dreaming.

    Reply
  4. Bernard Corden says

    February 25, 2019 at 8:09 PM

    Make that 97 confirmed cases of mine dust lung diseases and given the primary object of the model Act is to secure the health and safety of people at work it can hardly be operating as intended.

    Reply
  5. Bernard Corden says

    February 25, 2019 at 7:36 PM

    This is reflected via the recent report following the review of the Model WHS legislation, which finds the model laws are operating as intended.

    Quite extraordinary given there are currently 92 confirmed cases of mine dust lung diseases in Queensland and almost 100 cases of silicosis with 15 terminally ill victims:

    https://www.business.qld.gov.au/industries/mining-energy-water/resources/safety-health/mining/accidents-incidents/mine-dust-lung-diseases

    https://www.9news.com.au/2019/02/21/07/46/100-qld-workers-have-silicosis

    Almost 800 workers are currently undergoing testing for silicosis at a cost of $1.5 million

    Not much too see here, lets move on – Zero harm indeed, a moment is all it takes.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Bernard Corden Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,439 other subscribers

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Admin on Safety Silences in Culture – Affordances
  • Luke Smith on Importance of Forklift Training
  • Rob Long on Safety Silences in Culture – Affordances
  • Jason on Safety Silences in Culture – Affordances
  • Andrew Floyd on Clarity Enabled
  • Rob Long on Clarity Enabled
  • Rob Long on The Benefits of SPOR
  • Matt Thorne on Clarity Enabled
  • Rob Long on What Is Safety?
  • Mike on What Is Safety?

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Recent Posts

  • Safety Silences in Culture – Affordances
  • Safety Silences in Culture – Personhood
  • Face to Face SPoR Workshops 2022
  • The Benefits of SPOR
  • No Secrets and the Professionalisation of Safety Knowledge
  • Clarity Enabled
  • Culture Silence in Safety – Cultural Capital
  • I’m just not that into safety anymore
  • Olympic Goals and Zero Harm
  • A Guide to Psychosocial Safety Skills

What is Psychological Safety at Work?

Footer

Top Posts & Pages

  • BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2022
  • Free Safety Moments Examples, Tips and Resources
  • Safety Silences in Culture – Affordances
  • Road Safety Slogans 2022
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
  • Free Risk Assessment Template in Excel Format
  • IDEAS FOR SAFETY TOOL BOX TALKS, HARD HAT CHATS and SAFETY MOMENTS
  • What Is Safety?
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE

FEATURED POSTS

Its all About Behaviours

Overcoming Safety Indoctrination

Social Media and Safety

Snap, Crackle, Pop. That’s the Sound we Love to Hear

The Psychology of Blaming in Safety

Speaking a New Language in Safety

The Repression of Uncertainty

Human Dymensions Feb17 Newsletter and Competition

Suggested Safety Reading for 2018

Post Graduate Safety Potato Heads

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,439 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site