• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SafetyRisk.net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE
    • Slogans
      • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
      • When Slogans Don’t Work
      • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
      • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
      • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
      • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
      • Safety Acronyms
      • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
      • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
      • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
      • Safety Slogans List
      • Road Safety Slogans 2023
      • How to write your own safety slogans
      • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
      • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
      • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
      • Safety Slogans for Work
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • Free Hotel and Resort Risk Management Checklist
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • Social Psychology Of Risk
    • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Dr Long Posts
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no Hierarchy of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • THEMES
    • Psychosocial Safety
    • Resiliencing
    • Risk Myths
    • Safety Myths
    • Safety Culture Silences
    • Safety Culture
    • Psychological Health and Safety
    • Zero Harm
    • Due Diligence
  • Free Learning
    • Introduction to SPoR – Free
    • FREE RISK and SAFETY EBOOKS
    • FREE ebook – Guidance for the beginning OHS professional
    • Free EBook – Effective Safety Management Systems
    • Free EBook – Lessons I Have Learnt
  • Psychosocial Safety
    • What is Psychosocial Safety
    • Psychological Safety
      • What is Psychological Health and Safety at Work?
      • Managing psychosocial hazards at work
      • Psychological Safety – has it become the next Maslow’s hammer?
      • What is Psychosocial Safety
      • Psychological Safety Slogans and Quotes
      • What is Psychological Safety?
      • Understanding Psychological Terminology
      • Psycho-Social and Socio-Psychological, What’s the Difference?
      • Build a Psychologically Safe Workplace by Taking Risks and Analysing Failures
      • It’s not weird – it’s a psychological safety initiative!
You are here: Home / Robert Long / Dumbs for Safety

Dumbs for Safety

August 16, 2019 by Dr Rob Long 36 Comments

imageThere’s nothing quite like a safety campaign that doesn’t consider what it communicates unconsciously through semiotics and messaging. This is classically displayed in the Mums for Safety campaign . It doesn’t matter how you ‘spin’ the framing and priming of this campaign its message promotes the opposite of what it seeks to uphold.

Of course in the world of compliance and binary opposition of safety the following criticism will be attributed as toxicity and negativity. The last thing one can do in safety is be critical of the sacred safety cow.

In order to understand critical thinking one needs to know about the nature of power and communication to the unconscious. The real power in communication is never the overt message but the covert message demonstrated in how one organises presentation and in semiotics (The Medium and the Message ).

It is always critical in communications and messaging to pay attention to what is said and NOT said and to focus on symbols and unconscious messaging. All messaging requires consideration of who and what is omitted in messaging and is just as important as what one might consider as ‘obvious’ in a direct message. Is the next campaign Dads for Safety? LGBTQI Safety?

In the Mum’s for Safety campaign it is clear that grown men and women can’t make effective decisions without the presence of their Mum. I can just imagine the steelfixers and formworkers on site giving the men in this video promotion a roasting should they walk on site. The campaign effectively makes these people a laughing stock, including the CEO who stands reprimanded by his mother because he can’t get something right. The hidden message in this campaign is that grown ups can’t make decisions without their mother around! Poor old David needs his mum to grab him by the scruff of the neck like a child and save him from harm. Poor old Tony needs Mum to help him from a falling object.

The whole messaging in this promotion is about childishness and co-dependence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codependency ). Co-dependence is considered a mental health disorder when one person is dependent on another to remain in an immature state.

Even the stereotyping, military music and symbolism in the campaign is against any message of humanising a mature approach to risk and safety, where wisdom in decision making is made by grown adults who don’t need their mum around to tell them how to think.

There is really no surprise in this marketing in safety. It’s pretty much inline with other dumbs for safety campaigns like: Hazardman, the Bloody Idiot Safety Campaign, Zero Suicide, Dumb Ways to Die or the recent Safety Reset in Queensland or the Safety Gimp (https://safetyrisk.net/dumb-ways-to-improve-rail-safety/ ). Unless unconscious messaging is considered in what goes on you end up promoting safety through beasts (https://safetyrisk.net/dont-make-safety-a-habit/) and heroes (https://safetyrisk.net/i-have-the-power-im-a-safety-hero/) and all kinds of mumbo jumbo (https://safetyrisk.net/calculators-matrices-and-mumbo-jumbo-risk-assessment/) that detract from the simple message that risk and safety is an everyday ordinary activity that requires wisdom and maturity to effectively tackle risk.

Of course, when zero doesn’t work and it’s by products create an anti-safety culture one needs some new campaign or blitz to demonstrate just how immature Safety is.

Unfortunately, in the safety world any criticism of safety or deconstruction by critical thinking of safety is deemed an enemy of safety. When compliance is the god then debate is the devil. It seems like it’s easier to spend millions on this non-sense than actually tackling critical issues in risk and safety in the workplace. And, none of these campaigns work, even under consideration of safety data there is no benefit. The real outcome is that Safety once again appears childish and immature not able to grow up into the big broad mature world of being professional.

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • Video Series on Learning with Nippin Anand - June 9, 2023
  • A Conversation About Learning - June 7, 2023
  • Brady Review, Nothing New, No Way Forward – Republished - June 7, 2023
  • Embodied Learning in Risk - June 7, 2023
  • Fake Paperwork Ethics, Spin and The Freedom to Harm - June 3, 2023
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Robert Long, Semiotics, Social Psychology of Risk Tagged With: mums for safety

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Sue Davie says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:58 PM

    Another great deconstruction of the commercial and religious ideals of H&S, and I write not only as a Director of the family construction company, I am the company H&S Officer and also Mum, Aunt, wife and sister-in-law to some of the employees.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      February 13, 2020 at 10:03 PM

      Thanks Sue, great pick up on the religious nature of all this. When the dogma of safety becomes blindly sacred then one’s eyes become closed to criticism and debate and in the end anything in the name of safety becomes sacred.

      Reply
  2. Dyno says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:58 PM

    Very nice post on how power is transferred unconsciously via semiotics. I would feel safe in saying more than half those who would label themselves “Safety Professionals” have either never heard of semiotics or could explain what they are and why understanding how the influence us is a critical part of becoming more mature in how we manage and learn from risk.

    On a side note (and maybe this is a Dave Collins question) I have noticed for the past few months I can no longer link or post these blog posts on my LinkedIn account. I think I posted 85 to 90 percent of your posts in the past and I know several people who would consistently comment to me on LinkedIn (privately of course) that they either agree 100% with the posts OR learned something new. Were we making LinkedIn nervous by providing a lit path to a trajectory of learning and humanity vs the binary, mechanistic way from orthodox safety? Or is it possible I am just missing the LinkedIn button? Either way, I love reading these posts, copying them on my thumb drive and sharing the learning with others.

    Reply
    • Dave Collins says

      February 13, 2020 at 7:58 PM

      Hi Dyno – I am trully amazed by the number of “Safety Professionals” who jump on these initiatives and proclaim them as an “awesome initiative” and wouldnt dare question the real agenda or the byproducts – perhaps a few years ago I would have as well?

      On your other question, I was having problems with the share buttons so removed them ’til I figured it out. They seem to be working again now so they have returned – thanks for the reminder and thanks heaps for sharing

      Reply
      • Rob Long says

        February 13, 2020 at 8:04 PM

        Of course, the constant tirade of these PR campaigns and silly discourse demonstrates that safety is not a profession. In order to be professional one would have to accept and engage in debate outside of one’s own fortress and delusion of zero and there is no evidence of this anywhere.

        Reply
      • bernardcorden says

        February 13, 2020 at 10:03 PM

        CAE used to stand for College of Advanced Education but I only found out quite recently following a visit to a mobile phone store that it actually stands for cool, awesome, excellent.

        Reply
    • Rob Long says

      February 13, 2020 at 10:03 PM

      Dyno, the label of ‘professional’ its well with those who have little idea of what it means. Can you just imagine a profession coming out with a ‘Mums for Social Work’ campaign or ‘Dads for Nursing’. The problem is that any criticism of safety is understood as non-compliant and anti-safety which is driven by the immature and binary unprofessionalism that plagues dumb down safety. This will remain so as long as the curriculum stays in its current state and after every review by a regulator and engineer its culture simply becomes more entrenched and the bureaucracy to cement it in place grows exponentially. The Boland report is a calssic example of more of the same and closing the gates on the fortress.
      I don’t know how you stay on Linkedin, it simply reinforces the point that safety is light years from becoming professional.

      Reply
      • Dyno says

        February 14, 2020 at 12:48 AM

        Rob, LinkedIn is a place where I drop SPoR blog posts and let those who follow me enjoy them AND to occasionally view new job openings that may be to my liking. Other than that, it is a toxic dump. And that probably is more of a dig on toxic dumps than it is orthodox safety.

        Reply
  3. Dyno says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:58 PM

    Thank you Mr. Collins! And the few followers I have who love reading these posts on my LinkedIn page thank you as well. I believe it is a “guilty pleasure” for many of them to see commentary that makes sense vs. the brutal discourse and trajectory of orthodox safety.

    Reply
  4. Jeff says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:54 PM

    Oh no, what am I to do, I’m an orphan . . . does that make me unsafe now?

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      February 13, 2020 at 7:58 PM

      Obviously Dads don’t care about safety but Mums are the voice of reason! Please, what stereotypical simplistic claptrap! Can safety get any more immature and dumb.

      Reply
    • Rob Long says

      February 13, 2020 at 7:58 PM

      We were deconstructing this in the iThink workshop this week and several of the participants stated their Mums were NOT the voice of reason or care. Some suggested their Mums were hyper-emotional and the last sourse to consult.

      Reply
  5. Swirley says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:54 PM

    Thanks Rob I am having to deal with similar thing with one site that I provide WHS advice to, celebrated 2000 days LTI free last week. I was howled down when I suggested that workers will not report injuries as they will not want to be forever known as the person who broke the record. The manager doesn’t see that the message and this record has now become their religion and they idolize the the number above all other things.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      February 13, 2020 at 7:54 PM

      Swirley, pretty hard to be a professional when the manager forces one into DD safety.

      Reply
  6. Mark Wagner says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:54 PM

    What an awesome article Rob – exposing this absurdity – as the (other) great man Lou Reed says…”you can’t always trust your mother” Last great American whale, New York album..some time around the 90’s

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      February 13, 2020 at 7:58 PM

      Thanks Mark, when one is indoctrinated into the dumb down world one doesn’t know one is in it and soon pretty much anything paraded in the name of safety must be validated no matter how absurd.

      Reply
  7. Jason says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:54 PM

    Love this!

    Reply
  8. David Skegg says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:54 PM

    One of your best Rob!

    Reply
  9. Dyno says

    August 18, 2019 at 10:49 PM

    Thank you Mr. Collins! And the few followers I have who love reading these posts on my LinkedIn page thank you as well. I believe it is a “guilty pleasure” for many of them to see commentary that makes sense vs. the brutal discourse and trajectory of orthodox safety.

    Reply
  10. Dyno says

    August 16, 2019 at 9:43 PM

    Very nice post on how power is transferred unconsciously via semiotics. I would feel safe in saying more than half those who would label themselves “Safety Professionals” have either never heard of semiotics or could explain what they are and why understanding how the influence us is a critical part of becoming more mature in how we manage and learn from risk.

    On a side note (and maybe this is a Dave Collins question) I have noticed for the past few months I can no longer link or post these blog posts on my LinkedIn account. I think I posted 85 to 90 percent of your posts in the past and I know several people who would consistently comment to me on LinkedIn (privately of course) that they either agree 100% with the posts OR learned something new. Were we making LinkedIn nervous by providing a lit path to a trajectory of learning and humanity vs the binary, mechanistic way from orthodox safety? Or is it possible I am just missing the LinkedIn button? Either way, I love reading these posts, copying them on my thumb drive and sharing the learning with others.

    Reply
    • Dave Collins says

      August 16, 2019 at 10:10 PM

      Hi Dyno – I am trully amazed by the number of “Safety Professionals” who jump on these initiatives and proclaim them as an “awesome initiative” and wouldnt dare question the real agenda or the byproducts – perhaps a few years ago I would have as well?

      On your other question, I was having problems with the share buttons so removed them ’til I figured it out. They seem to be working again now so they have returned – thanks for the reminder and thanks heaps for sharing

      Reply
      • Rob Long says

        August 17, 2019 at 7:44 AM

        Of course, the constant tirade of these PR campaigns and silly discourse demonstrates that safety is not a profession. In order to be professional one would have to accept and engage in debate outside of one’s own fortress and delusion of zero and there is no evidence of this anywhere.

        Reply
      • bernardcorden says

        August 19, 2019 at 7:28 AM

        CAE used to stand for College of Advanced Education but I only found out quite recently following a visit to a mobile phone store that it actually stands for cool, awesome, excellent.

        Reply
    • Rob Long says

      August 17, 2019 at 7:50 AM

      Dyno, the label of ‘professional’ its well with those who have little idea of what it means. Can you just imagine a profession coming out with a ‘Mums for Social Work’ campaign or ‘Dads for Nursing’. The problem is that any criticism of safety is understood as non-compliant and anti-safety which is driven by the immature and binary unprofessionalism that plagues dumb down safety. This will remain so as long as the curriculum stays in its current state and after every review by a regulator and engineer its culture simply becomes more entrenched and the bureaucracy to cement it in place grows exponentially. The Boland report is a calssic example of more of the same and closing the gates on the fortress.
      I don’t know how you stay on Linkedin, it simply reinforces the point that safety is light years from becoming professional.

      Reply
      • Dyno says

        August 18, 2019 at 10:42 PM

        Rob, LinkedIn is a place where I drop SPoR blog posts and let those who follow me enjoy them AND to occasionally view new job openings that may be to my liking. Other than that, it is a toxic dump. And that probably is more of a dig on toxic dumps than it is orthodox safety.

        Reply
  11. Sue Davie says

    August 16, 2019 at 8:08 PM

    Another great deconstruction of the commercial and religious ideals of H&S, and I write not only as a Director of the family construction company, I am the company H&S Officer and also Mum, Aunt, wife and sister-in-law to some of the employees.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      August 17, 2019 at 7:51 AM

      Thanks Sue, great pick up on the religious nature of all this. When the dogma of safety becomes blindly sacred then one’s eyes become closed to criticism and debate and in the end anything in the name of safety becomes sacred.

      Reply
  12. Mark Wagner says

    August 16, 2019 at 1:52 PM

    What an awesome article Rob – exposing this absurdity – as the (other) great man Lou Reed says…”you can’t always trust your mother” Last great American whale, New York album..some time around the 90’s

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      August 17, 2019 at 7:53 AM

      Thanks Mark, when one is indoctrinated into the dumb down world one doesn’t know one is in it and soon pretty much anything paraded in the name of safety must be validated no matter how absurd.

      Reply
  13. Jason says

    August 16, 2019 at 12:48 PM

    Love this!

    Reply
  14. Swirley says

    August 16, 2019 at 11:36 AM

    Thanks Rob I am having to deal with similar thing with one site that I provide WHS advice to, celebrated 2000 days LTI free last week. I was howled down when I suggested that workers will not report injuries as they will not want to be forever known as the person who broke the record. The manager doesn’t see that the message and this record has now become their religion and they idolize the the number above all other things.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      August 16, 2019 at 2:57 PM

      Swirley, pretty hard to be a professional when the manager forces one into DD safety.

      Reply
  15. Jeff says

    August 16, 2019 at 11:26 AM

    Oh no, what am I to do, I’m an orphan . . . does that make me unsafe now?

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      August 16, 2019 at 3:01 PM

      We were deconstructing this in the iThink workshop this week and several of the participants stated their Mums were NOT the voice of reason or care. Some suggested their Mums were hyper-emotional and the last sourse to consult.

      Reply
    • Rob Long says

      August 17, 2019 at 7:55 AM

      Obviously Dads don’t care about safety but Mums are the voice of reason! Please, what stereotypical simplistic claptrap! Can safety get any more immature and dumb.

      Reply
  16. David Skegg says

    August 16, 2019 at 11:07 AM

    One of your best Rob!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Rob Long Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,526 other subscribers

Recent Comments

  • Rob Long on Proving Safety: Observations on “Worker Insights”
  • Rob Long on It is NOT My Responsibility to Keep You Safe
  • Chris. on It is NOT My Responsibility to Keep You Safe
  • Pierre Joubert on Zero Doesn’t Work, Road Fatalities Increase
  • James on We are all equal
  • Rob Long on We are all equal
  • James Parkinson on We are all equal
  • Brent Charlton on What Does Safety Achieve?
  • Admin on We are all equal
  • James Parkinson on We are all equal
  • Rob Long on What Does Safety Achieve?
  • Brent Charlton on We are all equal
  • Brent Charlton on We are all equal
  • Brent Charlton on We are all equal
  • Brent Charlton on What Does Safety Achieve?
  • Simon Cassin on You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time
  • Simon Cassin on You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time
  • Rob Long on You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time
  • Rob Long on You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time
  • Rob Long on You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time

RECOMMENDED READING

viral post – iso 45003 and what it cannot do

Introduction to SPOR – FREE!!

Psychosocial Safety and Mental Health Series

It is NOT My Responsibility to Keep You Safe

The KISS of Death in Safety

Is Your Safety World Too Small?

You Can Fool Someone Some of the Time but, You Can Fool Safety All of the Time

When Safety (Zero) is Abusive

Hands Up the Best Safety Fraud!

Communicating Professionally in Risk

How NOT to be Professional in Safety

How NOT to do Anything About Culture in Building and Construction

Celebrating 60 Years of Lifeline

More Posts from this Category

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Footer

VIRAL POST – The Risk Matrix Myth

Top Posts & Pages. Sad that most are so dumb but this is what safety luves

  • 500 OF THE BEST AND WORST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2023
  • Free Safety Moments and Toolbox Talk Examples, Tips and Resources
  • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
  • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS, CHECKISTS, REGISTERS, TEMPLATES and APPS
  • Safety Acronyms
  • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
  • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • What Is Safety?
  • Road Safety Slogans 2023
  • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES

Recent Posts

  • Video Series on Learning with Nippin Anand
  • Proving Safety: Observations on “Worker Insights”
  • A Conversation About Learning
  • Brady Review, Nothing New, No Way Forward – Republished
  • Disrupting the Methodology in Safety?
  • Embodied Learning in Risk
  • Fake Paperwork Ethics, Spin and The Freedom to Harm
  • Stop the Job You Haven’t Done Your ‘Tick & Flick’
  • Culture Silences in Safety – Language
  • When Blame Comes Easy, A Lesson From Job
  • Identity, Regulation and Risk, It’s not Just Worksafe NZ
  • AI and Safety, Brutalism on Steroids
  • Beware of Hazardous ‘OINTMENT’
  • Embodied Risk
  • The Convenience of Complacency
  • Asking Better Questions in Risk
  • SPoR – Positive, Constructive, Practical, Rational, Visual, Verbal, Social, Relational, Person-Centric, Respectful, Ethical and Real
  • History and Hindsight in Safety
  • Process driven or People driven? What’s your Focus?
  • Anchoring, Framing and Priming Risk
  • What’s Your Agenda in Safety?
  • What is a Safety Reset?
  • The Myth of Neuroscience Safety
  • When Safety Delights in ‘I Told You So’!
  • Beware the Cult of Denial
  • My Story is Better than Yours
  • Understanding Safety as a Cultural Reproductive Process
  • The Unconscious and the Soap Dispenser
  • Thinking Outside the Safety Bubble
  • Understanding Language Influencing, A Video
  • Safetie
  • You are NOT the Sum of Safety
  • Update on SPoR in India, Brazil and Europe
  • It is NOT My Responsibility to Keep You Safe
  • Safety at the Margins
  • Research Basics for Safety
  • We Need Communities and They Need Us
  • Researching Within The Safety Echo Chamber
  • Confirmation Bias, Risk and Being Offensive
  • Lemmings for Lemmings in Leadership and Risk
  • Expertise by Regurgitation and Re-Badging
  • Zero Doesn’t Work, Road Fatalities Increase
  • Can There Be Other Valid Worldviews Than Safety?
  • Evaluating Value by the Value of What You Don’t Know
  • Reality vs Theory, The Binary Divide
  • No Paradigm Shift with BBS
  • The KISS of Death in Safety
  • Is Your Safety World Too Small?
  • What Does Safety Achieve?
  • In Praise of Balance in Risk and the Threat of Extremism

VIRAL POST!!! HOW TO QUIT THE SAFETY INDUSTRY

FEATURED POSTS

Deconstruction and Reconstruction for Safety

Why Personify Safety?

Learning Styles Matter

Suffering – Sometimes There Is No Reason

What Does Misinformation Do in Safety?

Don’t Dare Speak the ‘f’ Word

I Have the Power, I’m a Safety Hero

Next Free Online Studies Introduction to Social Psychology of Risk

Tentative at Tooleybuc

Trinket Safety

What are Your Secret Messages in Safety?

OnLine Learning Modules with CLLR

Safety and The Sunk Cost Fallacy

The Common Sense Fallacy

All Risk is Subjective

Adversarialism and the Politicisation of Safety

The Social Psychology of Risk Handbook, i-thou

The Challenges for Organisations in Dealing with Mental Health

Paralysis by Precaution

The Psychology of Blaming in Safety

Understanding Safety as an Archetype

Developing Our Inner Introversion

Framing Folly and Fantasy in Safety

CLLR April 2017 Newsletter–Not Your Usual Safety Newsletter!!

SPoR, Ideology and Safety Myth

Selective Harm for Rio Tinto

Wellness, Mindfulness and Resiliencing in Psychological Safety

Safety Holistically a Case for Change

Scenario Learning in Risk and Safety

Anchoring, Framing and Priming Risk

Post Graduate Safety Potato Heads

SPoR Comes to Vienna June 2023

Spin, Nonsense Language and Propaganda in Safety

Safety Career Highlight

Sense-Making and Decision-Making in Risk

It’s a Great Goal, it Just Doesn’t Work

Safety is an Art

Looking for Another Side

Rituals in Risk Management – Podcast

‘False Consciousness’ and Perception in Risk and Safety

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,526 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site

WHAT IS PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY?

What is Psychological Safety at Work?


WHAT IS PSYCHOSOCIAL SAFETY

x
x