• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Safety Risk .net

Humanising Safety and Embracing Real Risk

  • Home
    • About
      • Privacy Policy
      • Contact
  • FREE RESOURCES
    • FREE SAFETY eBOOKS
    • FREE DOWNLOADS
    • TOP 50
    • FREE RISK ASSESSMENT FORMS
    • Find a Safety Consultant
    • Free Safety Program Documents
    • Psychology Of Safety
    • Safety Ideas That Work
    • HEALTH and SAFETY MANUALS
    • FREE SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT RESOURCES
    • Whats New In Safety
    • FUN SAFETY STUFF
    • Health and Safety Training
    • SAFETY COURSES
    • Safety Training Needs Analysis and Matrix
    • Top 20 Safety Books
    • This Toaster Is Hot
    • Free Covid-19 Toolbox Talks
    • Download Page – Please Be Patient With Larger Files…….
    • SAFETY IMAGES, Photos, Unsafe Pictures and Funny Fails
    • How to Calculate TRIFR, LTIFR and Other Health and Safety Indicators
    • Download Safety Moments from Human Resources Secretariat
  • PSYCH. OF SAFETY & RISK
    • Safety Psychology Terminology
    • Some Basics on Social Psychology & Risk
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk – Prof Karl E. Weick
    • The Psychology of Leadership in Risk
    • Conducting a Psychology and Culture Safety Walk
    • The Psychology of Conversion – 20 Tips to get Started
    • Understanding The Social Psychology of Risk And Safety
    • Psychology and safety
    • The Psychology of Safety
    • Hot Toaster
    • TALKING RISK VIDEOS
    • WHAT IS SAFETY
    • THE HOT TOASTER
    • THE ZERO HARM DEBATE
    • SEMIOTICS
    • LEADERSHIP
  • Robert Long
    • ALL POSTS
    • Learning Styles Matter
    • There is no HIERARCHY of Controls
    • Scaffolding, Readiness and ZPD in Learning
    • What Can Safety Learn From Playschool?
    • Presentation Tips for Safety People
    • Dialogue Do’s and Don’ts
    • It’s Only a Symbol
    • Ten Cautions About Safety Checklists
    • Zero is Unethical
    • First Report on Zero Survey
    • There is No Objectivity, Deal With it!
  • Quotes & Slogans
    • Researchers Reveal the Top 10 Most Effective Safety Slogans Of All Time
    • When Slogans Don’t Work
    • CLASSIC, FAMOUS and INFAMOUS SAFETY QUOTES
    • BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2022
    • CATCHY and FUNNY SAFETY SLOGANS FOR THE WORKPLACE
    • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
    • Safety Acronyms
    • You know Where You Can Stick Your Safety Slogans
    • Sayings, Slogans, Aphorisms and the Discourse of Simple
    • Spanish Safety Slogans – Consignas de seguridad
    • Safety Slogans List
    • Road Safety Slogans 2022
    • How to write your own safety slogans
    • Why Are Safety Slogans Important
    • Safety Slogans Don’t Save Lives
    • 40 Free Safety Slogans For the Workplace
    • Safety Slogans for Work
  • Safety Culture
    • Safety Culture Silences
You are here: Home / Robert Long / Defining Safety

Defining Safety

September 30, 2019 by Dr Rob Long 12 Comments

imageA comment to a blog recently by Kevin Jones stated: ‘……issues that OHS usually does not engage with, such as staff resourcing, production timelines, lack of appropriate training and knowledge and more. How can the OHS profession affect changes in these areas? Should we become social activists on (non-OHS-related) matters?’ What an interesting way to define ‘non-OHS- related matters’. Why is it that Safety has evolved to this state where critical aspects to do with people-at-work are deemed by the industry as ‘non-OHS-related’?

Unfortunately, over the past 30 years the safety industry has come to define itself as the caretaker of WHS Legislation and Regulation. We see this evidenced in the AIHS BoK with a 75% focus on objects, systems and regulation. Similarly, in the curriculum we observe this same 75% focus, a clear legacy from the days when OHS (WHS) was understood as an engineering process. This history is also evidenced in the change of name from American Association of Safety Engineers to American Association of Safety Professionals in 2018. No wonder Safety has evolved to become the industry of counting , metrics, numerics, objects and policing!

However, there is no reason why such an evolution ought not be challenged by ‘social activists’. Why is it that the most critical factor in the safety equation – humans/people are not the focus of the industry? No wonder the ideology of zero has captured the industry and locked it into no vision. There can never be vision from an ideology of stasis and risk aversion. How crazy that the industry has no idea how to accept harm and can only maintain the delusion of infallibility.

It makes no-sense to keeping objects safe especially if humans/people are engaged with that object, objects are easily replaceable.

It is crazy that this industry of objects is so poorly prepared to tackle people-focused challenges at work in ‘helping’ people be safe. Have a look at the current AIHS or NSCA training programs and you will see evidence of this object-focused industry. See how zero shapes these associations and limits a people-focused vision.

Vision is not about objects nor regulation, vision is always about the future of people. I don’t care what the technology of the future is, the real question is how will it affect people? I don’t care what the work-process is either the real question is, how will it affect the social arrangement of people and communities?

Unless Safety moves from this zero-vision object-centred outlook it will never tackle the significant political and ethic issues that plague its telos.

 

  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
  • More about Rob
Dr Rob Long

Dr Rob Long

Expert in Social Psychology, Principal & Trainer at Human Dymensions
Dr Rob Long

Latest posts by Dr Rob Long (see all)

  • Safety Silences in Culture – Personhood - July 3, 2022
  • Face to Face SPoR Workshops 2022 - July 3, 2022
  • No Secrets and the Professionalisation of Safety Knowledge - July 2, 2022
  • Culture Silence in Safety – Cultural Capital - June 30, 2022
  • Olympic Goals and Zero Harm - June 28, 2022
Dr Rob Long
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA Rob is the founder of Human Dymensions and has extensive experience, qualifications and expertise across a range of sectors including government, education, corporate, industry and community sectors over 30 years. Rob has worked at all levels of the education and training sector including serving on various post graduate executive, post graduate supervision, post graduate course design and implementation programs.

Please share our posts

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Robert Long, Social Psychology of Risk, Zero Harm Tagged With: vision, what is safety

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. bernardcorden says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:41 PM

    The following statement comes from the profile for the AIHS Chair of the College of Fellows who recently endorsed the Boland Review………”In addition to the normal workload of the subcommittees of the College, the change from the SIA to the AIHS has involved a lot of backroom governance work as well as liaison with key leaders and submissions to major inquiries.”

    https://www.aihs.org.au/networks/college-fellows

    The AIHS or SIA did not provide any submissions to the federal parliament senate select committee inquiry into health policy, administration and expenditure.

    The AIHS or SIA did not provide any submissions to the Queensland parliamentary inquiry covering black lung or its extended terms of reference for other occupational respirable dusts.

    The AIHS or SIA did not provide any submissions to the CFA parliamentary inquiry in Victoria

    The AIHS or SIA did not provide any submissions to the federal parliamentary inquiry into the framework surrounding the prevention, investigation and prosecution of industrial deaths in Australia.

    Donald Trump could not have written it better.

    Reply
  2. bernardcorden says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:41 PM

    Sous les paves la plage

    Reply
  3. bernardcorden says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:38 PM

    The safety cult or sect, especially the AIHS and NSCA with cohorts of pseudo-academics have no integrity and are like a pack of hyenas stripping a dead carcass.

    Reply
  4. bernardcorden says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:38 PM

    It is somewhat ironic but the AIHS vision mentions productive workplaces and the OHS BOK structure identifies the sociopolitical context yet it operates in a closed system. This is obviously to ensure it reflects and aligns with the Friedman doctrine on corporate social responsibility and free market fundamentalism.

    It is extremely reluctant to challenge the orthodoxy, which is evident via the endorsement of zero harm ideology and the Boland whitewash. Maybe the AIHS and NSCA should amalgamate with the AiG and the ACCI.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      February 13, 2020 at 7:41 PM

      Unfortunately Bernard, the zero hole has been dug so deep they can’t get out.

      Reply
  5. bernardcorden says

    February 13, 2020 at 7:38 PM

    Another sinister feature with the rebranding of the SIA is its encroachment into mental health. Not content with how its scientism, structuralism and objectivism has extirpated occupational health and safety and created increasing psychosocial risks its dabbling in this professional discipline raises significant concerns.

    Much like the big four (PwC, Deloitte, KPMG and EY) with the collapse of Carillion in the UK and the disastrous home insulation program in Australia its charlatans and snake oil salesmen make a fortune providing consultancy services with superficial nostrums and are further rewarded trying to unravel the entrails from the dung heap it created.

    As soon as I see, hear or read anyone with post nominals such as FSIA, COHSProf or ChOHSP I smell bullshit.

    Reply
  6. bernardcorden says

    October 2, 2019 at 4:32 PM

    Another sinister feature with the rebranding of the SIA is its encroachment into mental health. Not content with how its scientism, structuralism and objectivism has extirpated occupational health and safety and created increasing psychosocial risks its dabbling in this professional discipline raises significant concerns.

    Much like the big four (PwC, Deloitte, KPMG and EY) with the collapse of Carillion in the UK and the disastrous home insulation program in Australia its charlatans and snake oil salesmen make a fortune providing consultancy services with superficial nostrums and are further rewarded trying to unravel the entrails from the dung heap it created.

    As soon as I see, hear or read anyone with post nominals such as FSIA, COHSProf or ChOHSP I smell bullshit.

    Reply
  7. bernardcorden says

    October 1, 2019 at 12:08 PM

    The following statement comes from the profile for the AIHS Chair of the College of Fellows who recently endorsed the Boland Review………”In addition to the normal workload of the subcommittees of the College, the change from the SIA to the AIHS has involved a lot of backroom governance work as well as liaison with key leaders and submissions to major inquiries.”

    https://www.aihs.org.au/networks/college-fellows

    The AIHS or SIA did not provide any submissions to the federal parliament senate select committee inquiry into health policy, administration and expenditure.

    The AIHS or SIA did not provide any submissions to the Queensland parliamentary inquiry covering black lung or its extended terms of reference for other occupational respirable dusts.

    The AIHS or SIA did not provide any submissions to the CFA parliamentary inquiry in Victoria

    The AIHS or SIA did not provide any submissions to the federal parliamentary inquiry into the framework surrounding the prevention, investigation and prosecution of industrial deaths in Australia.

    Donald Trump could not have written it better.

    Reply
  8. bernardcorden says

    September 30, 2019 at 7:42 PM

    The safety cult or sect, especially the AIHS and NSCA with cohorts of pseudo-academics have no integrity and are like a pack of hyenas stripping a dead carcass.

    Reply
  9. bernardcorden says

    September 30, 2019 at 12:27 PM

    It is somewhat ironic but the AIHS vision mentions productive workplaces and the OHS BOK structure identifies the sociopolitical context yet it operates in a closed system. This is obviously to ensure it reflects and aligns with the Friedman doctrine on corporate social responsibility and free market fundamentalism.

    It is extremely reluctant to challenge the orthodoxy, which is evident via the endorsement of zero harm ideology and the Boland whitewash. Maybe the AIHS and NSCA should amalgamate with the AiG and the ACCI.

    Reply
    • Rob Long says

      September 30, 2019 at 7:11 PM

      Unfortunately Bernard, the zero hole has been dug so deep they can’t get out.

      Reply
  10. bernardcorden says

    September 30, 2019 at 11:47 AM

    Sous les paves la plage

    Reply

Leave a Reply to bernardcorden Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search and Discover More on this Site

Never miss a post - Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,439 other subscribers

NEW! Free Download

Please take our 2 minute zero survey

Recent Comments

  • Andrew Floyd on Clarity Enabled
  • Rob Long on Clarity Enabled
  • Rob Long on The Benefits of SPOR
  • Matt Thorne on Clarity Enabled
  • Rob Long on WHAT IS SAFETY, REALLY?
  • Mike on WHAT IS SAFETY, REALLY?
  • Rob Long on Ritual Performance and Risk
  • Brent Charlton on Ritual Performance and Risk
  • Rob Long on Culture Silences in Safety – Socialitie
  • Joe Zinobile on Culture Silences in Safety – Socialitie

FREE eBOOK DOWNLOADS

Recent Posts

  • Safety Silences in Culture – Personhood
  • Face to Face SPoR Workshops 2022
  • The Benefits of SPOR
  • No Secrets and the Professionalisation of Safety Knowledge
  • Clarity Enabled
  • Culture Silence in Safety – Cultural Capital
  • I’m just not that into safety anymore
  • Olympic Goals and Zero Harm
  • A Guide to Psychosocial Safety Skills
  • CLLR Quarterly Newsletter–June 2022

What is Psychological Safety at Work?

Footer

Top Posts & Pages

  • BEST WORKPLACE HEALTH and SAFETY SLOGANS 2022
  • COVID-19 (Coronavirus, Omicron) Health and Safety Slogans and Quotes for the Workplace
  • Free Safety Moments Examples, Tips and Resources
  • Road Safety Slogans 2022
  • WHAT IS SAFETY, REALLY?
  • Face to Face SPoR Workshops 2022
  • Safety Silences in Culture – Personhood
  • No Secrets and the Professionalisation of Safety Knowledge
  • 15 Safety Precautions When Working With Electricity
  • Free Risk Assessment Template in Excel Format

FEATURED POSTS

Work-Life and Risk, Feminine Perspectives

The Lexicon of Safety Gibberish

SEEK Investigations Workshop

The Social Psychology of Risk Handbook, i-thou

I DON’T KNOW

The Psychology of Leadership in Risk

Why Have Some Freedom in Safety When a Dose of Fear and Guilt Will Do?

The Fear of Power and the Power of Fear

The Soul of Mental Health

Goals and Vision in Safety

More Posts from this Category

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address and join other discerning risk and safety people who receive notifications of new posts by email

Join 7,439 other subscribers

How we pay for the high cost of running of this site – try it for free on your site